Switch Theme:

KFF'ed vehicle's cover save. 4+ or not?..  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Poll
Cover save from KFF?
4+ Cover save
Not 4+ Cover save (5+,6+,7+,no cover, all other entries here)

View results
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Black Templar Recruit Undergoing Surgeries






I think that if the codex author and GW publications use it as a 4+ cover save, why argue with that...? Are you seriously going to tell GW they've got their own rules wrong?

EDIT: Kingcracker could please tell me where you got the GW flier, and also the edition of WD that that bit is in, along with page number if possible! That'd be wonderful, thanks.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2011/06/22 18:56:10


 
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: