| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/27 02:34:33
Subject: blood angels still viable?
|
 |
Infiltrating Prowler
wocka flocka rocka shocka
|
I was wondering, with the meta heavy in terminator troops, how viable are blood angels?
|
captain fantastic wrote: Seems like this thread is all that's left of Remilia Scarlet (the poster).
wait, what? Σ(・□・;) |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/27 02:35:28
Subject: Re:blood angels still viable?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Feasting on the souls of unworthy opponents
|
*laughing*
Seriously?
Blood Angels are at the top, winning their fair share.
*edit* And the meta isn't heavy into terminator troops. There's one codex heavy into terminators (Dark Angels) which isn't a highly represented army, and the "meta" consists of lots of transports and minimal sized units.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/06/27 02:36:26
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/27 02:58:36
Subject: blood angels still viable?
|
 |
Infiltrating Prowler
wocka flocka rocka shocka
|
Oh, because in my area, it's all GK and DA, so I was wondering, I play a mechanized BA list, which is good, but, I was wanting to know, my w/l/d was 5/7/3 out of 15 games, each loss was against either GK, or terminator heavy dark angels. So, my new question then is, which is more viable:
A) a mechanized list heavy in dedicated transport, a unit of 2 landspeeders with typhoon and melta, a vindicator, attack bike, a baal predator, and whatnot.
Or
B) a list in which all units have jetpacks, no transport, power weapons, lightning claws, sanguinary priest, and a librarian, all troops 10 man, with a melta and infernus pistol in each unit of assault marines.
|
captain fantastic wrote: Seems like this thread is all that's left of Remilia Scarlet (the poster).
wait, what? Σ(・□・;) |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/27 03:10:57
Subject: blood angels still viable?
|
 |
Daemonic Dreadnought
|
Your w/l/d is probably because you are going up against more expierenced players.
Mech ba are very viable against ba or da.
3 fast vindicators with a 5+ cover from shield of sang is a nightmare for deathwing or gk.
Shield of sang is a huge force multiplier. Da have crappy ld 9 psychic hoods. Your librarian is ld10. Many gk don't have a libby, and even if they do their infantry is ld9 on psychic tests so a hood largely shuts them down.
Mech ba is here to stay. All jump ba is in a questionable state; I am not sure how to beat purifier spam with doa.
|
Chaos isn’t a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail, and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some are given a chance to climb, but refuse. They cling to the realm, or love, or the gods…illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is, but they’ll never know this. Not until it’s too late.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/27 03:22:40
Subject: blood angels still viable?
|
 |
Infiltrating Prowler
wocka flocka rocka shocka
|
Thank you, I've only been playing a year now, normally, my w/l/d would be better, but since everyone wants to use GK, iv'e become a bit disheartened. Anyways, I was only kidding about the jump pack list, I tried it, it works well against a lot of armies, but, falls flat on it's *** against anything with 2+ armor saves, I guess it's just me jinxing it. I love the mechanized list, because the assault marines, they give a nice 35 point disount on dedicated transport. The fast rule is very nice too, using it in capture control always puts me ahead.
|
captain fantastic wrote: Seems like this thread is all that's left of Remilia Scarlet (the poster).
wait, what? Σ(・□・;) |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/27 03:26:13
Subject: blood angels still viable?
|
 |
Tzeentch Veteran Marine with Psychic Potential
|
BA are great. They can dish it out and take it, and Blood Lance wrecks mech. Definitely a top tier army.
|
"Forget it, Jake. It's Chinatown." - Lawrence Walsh, Chinatown
"Yeah, f*ck you too!" - R.J. MacReady, The Thing |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/27 03:36:53
Subject: Re:blood angels still viable?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Blood Angels are amazing right now.
|
"AM are bunch of half human-half robot monkeys who keep tech working by punching it with a wrench And their tech is so sophisticated that you could never get it wrapped it out" thing a LITTLE to seriously. It also goes "Tau tech is so awesome I wish I was Tau and not some stupid Human" thing.
-Brother Coa Sig'd For the Greater Good |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/27 07:57:16
Subject: blood angels still viable?
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
Fast vehicle spam is viable these days.
However, as already said by Schadenfreude, DoA struggles vs. several armies,
it not only Purifiers but also MC heavy lists.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|