Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

*Ukulele

Deliverance style.

Just don't ask anyone to squeal like a pig.

Lord-Loss wrote:I think you can usually get some quote evidence in Day 1. I don't think I would vote for someone without them actually doing something suspicous. There hasn't been any major suspicous stuff happen in the game so far. So I guess you're going for me cause even thought I've been acting pro-town (Scum hunting, not bandwagoning, not doing anything suspicous really) You're going off my playstyle and think that makes it ok to vote for me?

The tone of something typed is pretty hard to read sometimes. None of my posts should come across as 'angry' 'annoyed' at all. So I don't see how you draw the comparesent to the DE game.

Fifty, I'm not usualy this argumentive cause i'm not used to be attacked while I do nothing suspicous.

Once again you're getting horribly wound up just because someone is voting for you. I know you have something to hide because of this. Tone in these posts can be hard to read, but yours really isn't.

I don't have my .txt file with me right now, but I will get it and put together a full case against you. There's plenty of stuff so far I can pull out and show the people.

I know it might look like I'm hounding LL for no good reason at this point, but I know that he's invested in this game more than he gets when he's just town. He might be an inquisitor for the side of good, in which case killing him would be a bad thing, but it's far more likely he's a daemon or a cultist by the numbers.

Bishop, you have either screwed up my grouping of you two or confirmed it with that post. You're either not in agroup with him, or you're trying to distance yourself from him.

Actually that post was meant to be slightly aqnnoyed. I'm coing t include little tone boxes at the bottom of my posts now!


(Happy)

╔════════╗
║Yay Boxes!!!!║
╚════════╝

Maybe votes should be in them...
Also I think it would be better if votes were now posted in colours rather than just bold. This way you can keep them within block of text for dramatic effect like some of you do. So from now, hopefully not being annoying to everyone, Unvotes are blue, Votes in red and votes for No Lynch in green. Of course still in bold as normal, but depending on how it goes I'll probably end up removing the bold requirement as it'll most likely become a waste of time. This way everyone can simply skim accross and find relevent posts that they may wish to quote.

Current votes

the_ferrett -0
ginger_nid_dude -3
VikingScott -0
Scarper -0
Lord-Loss -1
Drk_0blitr8r -1
Inquisitor_Syphonious -1
Paul Atreides -0
BishopGore -0
Arheiner -0
Karon -1
Fifty -1
Halonachos -1
Steempunk -0
BrotherStynier -0
IGLannister -3
TherVadam -1
No Lynch -0

With 17 alive 9 are required to lynch. Yet if this day phase were to run out of time the target with the most votes would go. That would be Lan/Nid at the moment to be decided randomly. Colour simply there to point out who would be lynched if the day phase ended at this point.

It's Thursday now leaving 5 days including today.

Vote log
Sorted like this voter (target)
Also split up into the colours for voting and unvoting so you can see a general ratio as well as spot any bandwagoning or such.
Also Votes for No Lynch will be in green.
Drk_0 (Ferret)
Halo (Drk_0)
Scott (Halo)
Nid (Scott)
50 (Nid)
Halo (Unvote Drk_0)
LL (50)
Syph (Drk_0)
Halo (Scott)
Lan (Scott)
Nid (unvote Scott)
Lan (unvote Scott)
Lan (No Lynch)
Scott (Unvote Halo)
Bishop (Ferret)
Bishop (unvote Ferret)
Scarper (Bishop)
Halo (unvote Scott)
Halo (No Lynch)
Drk_0 (unvote Ferret)
Drk_0 (Bishop)
Arhiener (Syph)
Paul (No Lynch)
Stynier (Karon)
Scarp (Unvote Bishop)
Halo (Unvote No Lynch)
Halo (Stynier)
Bishop (Halo)
Halo (Unvote Stynier)
Bishop's joke votes (not sure if he's still voting for halo, but I'm going to say he isn't until he does again )
Drk_0 (Unvote Bishop)
TherVadem (Lan)
Nid (Lan)
Lan (Unvote No Lynch)
Paul (Unvote No Lynch)
Scott (Stynier)
Scott (Unvote Stynier)
Halo (Lan)
LL (Nid)
Bishop (LL)
Drk_O (Lan)*
Vadem (Unvote Lan)*
Vadem (Vote Drk_O)*
NEW
Scott (Halo)
Vadem (Unvote Drk_O)
Vadem (Vote Nid)
Arheiner (Vote Vadem)
*Were missed so are not in the correct place

Also Lan 123 posts at the time of writing this (saw the complaining about the 100 posts)

Arheiner wrote:After seeing the list in the signup and noticing Inquisitor_Syphonious was on it twice, he's obviously mutating clones of himself.

VOTE: Inquisitor_Syphonious

Did you unvote me? Make sure you do!

Unless I am missing something, halonacho's votes are the least firm. He has a whopping seven votes/unvotes/no lynches... Heretical.

BishopGore wrote:
...and Atreides because he's not getting nearly enough spotlight right now...

Only a few days left now.

I know, I'm scared too. Scared and strangely insulted.

I think the cultists have stopped mentioning me in an effort to make me look suspicious, just by not bringing me up. I feel used and threatened.

In all seriousness, I had a weak suspicion that maybe lord-loss is bad, and the reason he didn't protect halonachos as he did with others a bit earlier was because he knows he is not on his side, and was trying to frame him. And now you seem to sense something fishy too. Maybe it was more than a hunch. Or maybe we are just stupid together.

Ah, the warming glow of recognition...I'm going to bask for a little bit, if that's ok.

Good idea n0t_u

It definately stands out more

I dislike this game, it's going to be AGES before we finally fully vote to lynch.

Inquisitor_Syphonious wrote:Unless I am missing something, halonacho's votes are the least firm. He has a whopping seven votes/unvotes/no lynches... Heretical.

Eight actually, and I am proud of it. I am not too stubborn that I will make a vote that lasts for more than several IRL days unless there is a fantastic amount of evidence.

I also thought that dark had laid a trap by voting for IG, I will guess that it is failed as nobody has acted funny since he did that, nobody attacked Drk even. I don't know so I'll keep it on IG until it gets close to deadline.

Inquisitor_Syphonious wrote:

Arheiner wrote:After seeing the list in the signup and noticing Inquisitor_Syphonious was on it twice, he's obviously mutating clones of himself.

VOTE: Inquisitor_Syphonious

Did you unvote me? Make sure you do!

I already voted for someone else, mainly because by now I thought we'd completed day 1.

Nope, we still have about 3 days till day one is over.

Speaking of days, boy did I have a day today. I'm taking a sailing class and today we practiced recovery after capsizing. Well, I mean the whole class didn't, just me and the guy piloting the boat with me. We were tipping and he slipped while changing position and pushed the boat back into the water.

We got it up right and I got stung by a friendly little jelly fish who proved the existance of God to me. It didn't use philosophy, instead it used examples, the example being it missed by boys by about 4 inches(I was wearing loose shorts that's how that happened).

The very thought of being stung by a jellyfish makes my penis shrivel.

But the lakers just won the finals, so I think that'll change here soon enough.

IGLannister wrote:The very thought of being stung by a jellyfish makes my penis shrivel.

But the lakers just won the finals, so I think that'll change here soon enough.

So, you're telling me that a championship win for the Lakers makes your penis immune to damage?

No. A Super Bowl win by the Cowboys would make it immune. Lakers winning gives it accelerated healing.

So do we know for certain that we want Nid or Lan yet?

Frankly I don't care who we get today as long as we get someone. Hopefully not one of our helpful power roles.

I actually have an interesting penis injury story if you guys are interested.

Awww, don't act like you're not interested.

This is entirely taking away from the thread and is not helping.

Don't make me go after you like I've gone after Drk_O in the past. Just ask him about how that goes.

So you're saying that if I don't stop discussing funny things in the room you're gonna try to vote me off?

Well, consider me dissappointed.

Yes I am going to try and vote you off because this thread is for playing Genestealer, not jerking off.

Then go ahead. Do your worst man. I've cast my vote, and been voted against. Go nuts.

VOTE: IGLANNISTER

Regardless, even if you roll up as an ally this is how it needs to be, you're clouding up the thread and making it hard to hunt.

No, actually I'm not. I was having a delightful conversation about sports, jellyfish, and penises, until you rushed in with a hardline stance on "discussing the game or Ima get you" tactics. So vote your little head off, my friend.

Your delightful conversation about sports, jellyfish and penises have nothing to do with the game. All they do is fill the thread with clutter they don't help out one bit. This isn't even like the Drk_O thing, at least he tried to keep it having something to do with the game.

You want to discuss that other stuff take it to OT that's what that hole is there for.

Hey there's downtime. For awhile it was only me and so e other dude on. He brought up jellyfish, I brought up the Lakers and genitals. Seeing as you were off doing something else at the time, I at least thought it would be okay to chat about interesting things like sailing and jellyfish and yada yada.

If you wanna try and persecute for people talking about anything unrelated to the game, then happy hunting my friend. But the fact is you have zero control over what the topic of conversation is.