Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Lan due to the votes hopping. Either he and Nachoes are very indecisive or they'e playing silly buggers. Either way it raises my hackles. Heretic behaviour, maybe not. Offputting - yep!

Lol that's it. Bandwagon it up fellas.

They asked me to 'vote'. Do you see any bold in my text?

I have this to say:

DOG PILE ON LANNISTER!

In all seriousness:

he only stated that he was suspicious of you. Not really a bandwagon vote, trying to stick in with the crowd? Maybe.

Crowd-surfing, bandwagoning. Same thing, minus the vote.

Meh, all the same I s'pose.

By the way, I just sent myself a PM... in case anyone wanted to know.

Was the PM about how handsome and manly I am? If so, you should forward that to the rest of dakka.

Inquisitor_Syphonious wrote:

Golly gee, that IGLannister fellow is so manly. I wish I could be more like him, he is my hero!

Lolz. Well said.

halonachos wrote:How can you be bandwagoned by cultists? You're the cultist and I'm sure of it, I'm also sure that you're just trying to get revenge of your loss by saying that we "bandwagoned".

You call this "hounding" are you serious? This was the only reference I had to Scott and the "Bandwagoning Defense". Hardly hounding in my own opinion.

LL wrote:We need to cool it down. Inqusitior, Nachos and those other two guys whos named I've forgotten but can't check cause we're on a new page, can you please explain your actions?

I also wanna add that it's very scummy (scummy = bad heretic like, you get the drift) to vote for people due to "fluff" reasons etc. There's a time and a place for that, it's the RVS, but what happened to Scott went just way to far. I don't think it's good for people to be on multiple votes in the RVS, it can lead to bandwagons like we just saw.

LL wrote:What are your thoughts on the recent bandwagon which developed on Viking Scott the RVS and your thought about the people involved and how suspicous you feel they are?

LL wrote:If anything Halonachos, you have something to prove, after building that ridiclous straw man again Scot and Drk_Oblit, I'm not sure about you. It might just be new player mistakes, I'm keeping my eyes open.

LL wrote:I don't like the way you bandowaged on Scott, that come combinded with the weird logic of yours you used to 'work out' how Scott and Drk_Oblit are inocent/guilty makes me suspicous.

LL wrote:When you jump on them in the RVS while they have two other votes, it's bandwagoning. What seems to single you out was your constant posting of stuff like "Ofcourse you're a heretic, we ain't bandwagoning" I can find thwe quotes later.

I disliked the way you seem to find thisd non existent link betwen Drk_Oblit and Scott, I can't see it.

LL wrote:I' got to admit after that little "episode" I feel a tad more suspicous of Halonachos. He was the main driving force behind that bandwagon.

Even though I argued my side more than several times using logic and defending myself, you still kept using your reason to attack me.

You thought that I was the reason for the bandwagoning, and why? Because I called Scott a heretic because he was doing math? Then Scott writes off his vote for me as a joke because he put a smiley face next to it, and that is acceptable to you?

I again, was the third to vote for Scott and I lack a reason for you to call me the "ringleader". I wish you would explain why I was the ringleader while Syphonius egged us on.

@ferrett,
Indeciveness is the key to flexibility.

@LL, I'm not trying to get you. In fact I don't think I have ever voted for you, nor said that anyone else should vote for you. The only thing I said was that you seem suspicious to me.

Very sorry about not being on, had no internet since friday night, and back. Since I have no idea whats happening, ive randomly generated a player to vote for, so here goes:

VOTE: TherVadem

Ferrett wrote:Bishop..... does that make me your next suspect? I wanna be voted on by you.... I've been a bad boy.

Flirting with me isn't going to help you out I'm actually getting the vibe of the genestealer game from you, when you just frilled around, stayed quiet and eventually voted for yourself out of frustration. Of course I know you're a very clever chap and player and attributed your success in the DE game to never lying, so:

@Ferrett: Are you a Daemon or Cultist? Do you have any intention of night killing pro-town players? Will you be possessing others to further your evil agenda?

Lord-Loss wrote:Your evidence against me is all down to my playstyle, lets be honest thats all you got. It not enough for a vote in my opinion, or a lynch. I havn't done anything suspicous, I'm doing my best to scum hunt but as stated above, I believe we're in a pickle.

I'm sorry, what exactly do we do on Day 1? You harp on at people for votes during the Probing Vote Phase which most often are people letting off steam (as pointed out by Halo, you've gone on and on about him), you make assumptions based on past games and you read between the lines. When I read your posts I see epic stories between the lines. I am often wrong, but I've played beside you in 2 games and in one you screamed guilty, in the other you didn't. So I believe in your guilt.

However, you can't be alone, there's plenty more scum to hunt...

Arheiner wrote:Very sorry about not being on, had no internet since friday night, and back. Since I have no idea whats happening, ive randomly generated a player to vote for, so here goes:

I like it. Strong, authoritative. Lacking in any form of foresight. It's Arheiner play through and through I kid, but bear in mind there are several players now getting growly about the continuation of Random Votes. However in TherVadam... well, you may have found a target. He's continuing to view Drk_O and GND as suspects, but that could just be my own blindness rather than him seeing things that don't exist.

Right now I'm watching LL primarily, Ferrett minorly (as he is far too smart for our own good), VikingScott for being a clumsy crazy so-and-so and Atreides because he's not getting nearly enough spotlight right now.
Not sure about IGLann... an odd one. Hrrrrm.

Only a few days left now.

Is there any form of policy on quoting from other games? Because I think I can get hold of a copy of one of LLs posts from another game that's near enough word for word some of his posts here when faced with votes

Bishop: I'd rather keep some mystery between us. Spoil the mystery and the relationship gets boring. Oh and Bishop - do you have Vassal?

I think some of those quotes were from me trying to get other people to talk in the game. It was pretty early and that Bandwagon was the main thing going on earlier

Seems I have been pretty hounding. I don't know why I saw you as the ing Leader, you did seem the most agressive out of the bandwagoning people.

I'm going to put thatn down to you all being new players for now.

Halo was only the suspicous person I could see. We don't have any really suspicous people which there are quote evidence for etc.

Is it bad that I'm happy that people are finally suspicious of me?

To Arheiner: BishopGore is right, Random Votes are somewhat looked down upon, but if you genuinely have reason to suspect me, then I have no issue with your vote.

To BishopGore: What do you mean? It seems at first that you suspect me a little bit "You may have found a target", but then you attribute yourself not seeing what I pointed out to yourself.

In all honesty, I can only suspect, and I try somewhat to drive forward what I suspect, but it's weak enough that it's hard to wow the masses with. On the other hand, Drk_O seems to have stopped scumhunting, and stopped genuinely contributing since just a little bit after the posts. Then again, I have the naivety of a teen, and the ramblings of an old man

BishopGore wrote:, VikingScott for being a clumsy crazy so-and-so
Only a few days left now.

I am both of these things, I'd like to thiink crazy moreso though.

the_ferrett wrote:Bishop: I'd rather keep some mystery between us. Spoil the mystery and the relationship gets boring. Oh and Bishop - do you have Vassal?

I claim sidestepping of the question your honour. I request that the witness get a good scragging.
And no, I don't have Vassal. I think you've asked me before, I keep meaning to look into it, but life tends to get in the way. I'm fairly proud of myself for finding time to post on here at all!

Lord-Loss wrote:Halo was only the suspicous person I could see. We don't have any really suspicous people which there are quote evidence for etc

I'm sure you'll claim it's not pro-town of me, but I don't see quote evidence as very useful at this stage of the game.

TherVadam wrote:To BishopGore: What do you mean? It seems at first that you suspect me a little bit "You may have found a target", but then you attribute yourself not seeing what I pointed out to yourself.

I know that Arheiner can be perceptive at times, and I was hoping to get him a little more involved so we could hear more of his wisdom. Plus he's a total scatterbrain, if he's scum then the more he talks the more likely he is to say something daft that will help us spot him With regards to my quote, I was encouraging Arheiner and saying that maybe he's seeing something which I am not. You're scum hunting and keeping the town informed, but I don't see this link between GND and Drk_O which you do. Scum like to make incorrect pairings to throw off pro-towners.

Well, I had better post as I worry I might start getting prodded if I don't.

Firstly, an OOCish post - We are all here to have fun. Let's please stop some of the negativity this thread has already seen.

Next - I have to admit to a certain tendency to side with some of the older players who I know better. So far, if I have not already played with you in other games, the only people who have stood out here are IGLannister, Halonachos and some Inquisitor_Syphonius(?)

Ferret seems as quiet as he has done in some other games.

Lord Loss, you seem slightly more defensive and argumentative, but nothing major.

Bishop Gore, you seem more chatty than the previous game.

Drk_O, you seem far more rational and sensible.

IGLannister, you seem very prickly and prone to see the worst in things.

Halonachos, you seem as if you post a bit too quickly sometimes, without thinking through what to say.

Inquisitor_Syphonious, you seem likea regular guy... so far.

I think you can usually get some quote evidence in Day 1. I don't think I would vote for someone without them actually doing something suspicous. There hasn't been any major suspicous stuff happen in the game so far. So I guess you're going for me cause even thought I've been acting pro-town (Scum hunting, not bandwagoning, not doing anything suspicous really) You're going off my playstyle and think that makes it ok to vote for me?

The tone of something typed is pretty hard to read sometimes. None of my posts should come across as 'angry' 'annoyed' at all. So I don't see how you draw the comparesent to the DE game.

Fifty, I'm not usualy this argumentive cause i'm not used to be attacked while I do nothing suspicous.

@Ferrett, I don't really know what you're trying to do, you arn't scum hunting, you havn't voiced any of your suspicons (Well not really) and you current behaviour isn't pro-town. Stop talking in riddles too.

Yeah, but please note that my slight leaning towards a--holish behavior, when called upon, is always reviewed. And when necessary, I do apologize for said behavior.

Do we even have any really good Day 1 quotes? I mean besides this:

IGLannister wrote:So just a quick thing. I have this infected ingrown hair, and in order to treat it, a doc has to jam a needle right through the top, numb it, then slice it open with a scalpel.

But after 3 days of hotpacking, I popped it, and I'm in high spirits. So I'm stoked.

I doubt we can get anything off of posts like that. This is still the day we use random votes I guess, except that everyone's being too cautious in their voting.

I agree. That was a good quote.

Inquisitor_Syphonious wrote:

Inquisitor_Syphonious wrote:

Golly gee, that IGLannister fellow is so manly. I wish I could be more like him, he is my hero!

Even better quote!

Agreed. That quote is astonishing in it's truth and accuracy.

TherVadam wrote:On the other hand, Drk_O seems to have stopped scumhunting, and stopped genuinely contributing since just a little bit after the posts.

There's not really much more I can do for now. Something needs to jump out at me again.

Wow, people are taking my vote seriously, suprising. However the comment from Ther about having genuine reason to suspect him making the vote OK in his eyes is suspicious to me, you're either saying prove it or vote me off, and you know that I cannot prove it.

@Lord - EXCLUDING voting, what else am I meant to do? Jump on the person while playing the Ucaylali?