Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Better as two models or one? I've seen tut somewhere that showed how you could get both using just one set of models but I'm not too model savvy. I'm going to commit to either them being one form or separate forms. I'm just wondering which one seems like the better choice.

They have rules to split apart into two models or combine into one in game.

You really need both.

But if you had to choose one, put them both separately, because you can't actually take them as a single model at the start of the game. You have to buy them as two individual models and then they combine in game.

Get some rare earth magnets, then magnetise the bases. Hopefully this will mean you can swap the models between individual and grouped.

With Coryphee you are better off using pins and holes.
There isn't enough surface area to attach magnets to.
One is on its tiptoes, the other in a stretched low pose, with the legs along the ground.

I've never used rare earth magnets but you'd totally be able to use them with the Coryphee. You'd just need to pin each model to a removable scenic element on the base that was large enough to house the magnet and do it that way, rather than housing the magnet in the model itself...

...if that makes sense...

Frank, look up Igor at GT, he was there with Malifaux last friday and he plays Colette (and has them as a combinable so you can see how they work with his).