Wich codex has the worst fluff?

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**remilia_scarlet**

Kanluwen wrote:Of course I won't back down. They are my views.
It's the same with my stance on the death penalty and homosexual marriages. People can stand against me as much as they want, it doesn't change my stance on them.

Fun fact though: I do have a hat right now.

Whoa, whoa, whoa! calm the feth down, we're talking about plastic, pewter, and resin army guys, not gay marriage.

**remilia_scarlet**

Jackster wrote:BA fluff is not actually that terrible (Getting ready to dodge all the flak that's coming my way)
Well, the part about the Necrons is kind of bewildering and the Sanguinar part is pretty silly, but at least it portrays their struggle against their innate flaws and fighting against extinctions and not being invincible uber dudes all the time.

This, of course, I'm tempted to post the "hitler finds out about the new blood angels codex" video, since most of the people whining about BA are the eldar and tyranid players.

**remilia_scarlet**

H.B.M.C. wrote:But that's more rules than fluff, right?

Yeah, however, I always recommend BA for starting a space marine army, due to having more troop choices, as well as other options, and being more playable. I would say DA isn't my favorite, with only one standard troop choice.