Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

CthuluIsSpy wrote:

-Really, really bad at CC, with one or two possible exceptions

I've played a couple of games against new Necrons with Eldar, and warriors/immortals turned out to be surprisingly durable in cc. Certainly not good, but can tie units (even cc specialists like Striking Scorpions) up in combat for a while. Same for scarabs, which are also cheap and ES makes them one of best value options.

Flayed ones, on the other hand, are absolutely dreadful - I love the old models but they're not going to see much action now...

Lychguard and Triarchs are just too expensive for what they bring - 5 poor cc models for the price of a monolith? No thanks!

Otherwise what's been said is pretty much bang on - more choice, some good options and more a force to be wielded with skill rather than just marching warriors behind monoliths. Should make games against and with Necrons more fun, which is the point, yes?