Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 10:01:45
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
[DCM]
Et In Arcadia Ego
|
Filename |
m2120187a_Sisters_of_Battle_FAQ_Version_1_0_December_2011.pdf_ |
Download
|
Description |
|
File size |
38 Kbytes
|
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2011/12/12 10:14:29
The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all
We love our superheroes because they refuse to give up on us. We can analyze them out of existence, kill them, ban them, mock them, and still they return, patiently reminding us of who we are and what we wish we could be.
"the play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king, |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 10:12:33
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFN FAQS too.
|
 |
Krazed Killa Kan
|
that took a long time to read... not?
2 unit changes only?? (and clarification on multiple Acts of Faith)..
|
2+2=5 for sufficiently large values of 2.
Order of St Ursula (Sisters of Battle): W-2, L-1, T-1
Get of Freki (Space Wolves): W-3, L-1, T-1
Hive Fleet Portentosa (Nids/Stealers): W-6, L-4, T-0
Omega Marines (vanilla Space Marine): W-1, L-6, T-2
Waagh Magshak (Orks): W-4, L-0, T-1
A.V.P.D.W.: W-0, L-2, T-0
www.40korigins.com
bringing 40k Events to Origins Game Fair in Columbus, Oh. Ask me for more info! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 11:28:52
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Waaagh! Warbiker
|
Well that's interesting last updated Jan_2011 they sat on it for a while
|
Plus it's fairly credible that a GW marketing campaign for their biggest release would fit on one side of A4 - Flashman |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 12:40:08
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Sister Oh-So Repentia
|
Cannot be attempted more than once? Sucks.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 12:43:00
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
FAQ for SoB pretty much says what we expected all along. No great revelations, but at least now I won't have to hear "No, it's totally intentional so we don't suck!" anymore.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 13:06:00
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
[DCM]
Dankhold Troggoth
|
Any thoughts from the fantasy players? I'm running out the door...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 13:14:23
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
RiTides wrote:Any thoughts from the fantasy players? I'm running out the door...
I for one, am finally glad we can put this to rest! Though this was apparently from Nov 30th so guess I'm a bit slow
Q: As Butchers and Slaughtermasters can take an ironfist, does this
mean that they can also wear magical armour? (p32)
A: Yes.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/12/12 13:16:42
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 14:42:51
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Yep, good ruling.
Same for Warpstone Tokens counting as power dice, essentially
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 14:46:21
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
|
Celestine's an IC now? That's good, at least.
|
Check out my Youtube channel!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 14:58:55
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Hmm. Retributors just got worse and St Celestine just got better. Interesting.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 14:59:14
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Auspicious Aspiring Champion of Chaos
|
New to me were Tomb Kings, Skaven, Ogres, and Orcs & Goblins. O&G: A couple questions I'd never thought to ask about. Also some fanatic/mangler movement answers that seem familiar but are still highlighted? Ogres: Kenshin pointed out the big one. Another handy one is ironblasters being more or less defined as war machines (no stand & shoot, ironcurse icon works against them). Skaven: Cracks Call *is* a template! Clarification on some of the goofier bell rules. WLC shots aren't stopped by monstrous infantry/cav/beasts. A weird ruling about how to place & fire the warpfire template. Tomb Kings: Clarifications on how character ridden chariots interact with certain rules. No ironcurse against Light of Death. Chariots break steadfast and disrupt with ranks of three (some of these might be old news- I had 1.0 on my machine, and this TK FAQ is 1.2) I think that's it for notables. There's other bits and pieces, so still worth a browse. Edit: Ah, good point Nos- forgot the warpstone token debate.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/12/12 15:00:15
“It was in lands of the Chi-An where she finally ran him to ground. There she kissed him deeply as he lay dying, and so stole from him his last, agonized breath.
On a delicate chain at her throat, she keeps it with her to this day.”
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 15:04:21
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
And just for all of you that think that I am a complete apologist and have never said anything bad about SoB's new codex, this is a substantial nerf to faith and largely makes faith completely useless.
Now that doesn't really hurt the army since faith has been less and less important since the WD codex came out, but the 'keep rolling until you got it' was a cool mechanic.
I am disappointed.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 15:05:07
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Sister Oh-So Repentia
|
Hmm...so still no clarification on Tomb Princes with Fencers Blades conferring their WS on their unit?
|
Peace through superior firepower. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 15:31:23
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
Alright! Slaughtermaster with armor! I could have seen them ruling the other way, but still, to all those naysayers  : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIA1_I9t4yg
The Greedy fist ruling is a bit unexpected.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 15:31:48
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Stealthy Dark Angels Scout with Shotgun
Staten Island, NY
|
I expected them to nerf the acts of faith, but it's a damn shame they actually made it happen. I know a few people that are going to be extremely frustrated when they hear of this.
|
Deathwing - 2500 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 16:06:25
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
!!Goffik Rocker!!
(THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
|
They made Celestine even better. Was being 100 points under-costed not enough? Could they not admit to the typo? I think I would despise playing against the SoBs because of that one model. Thankfully I've never seen an SoB army before, so my rage is in check.
|
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Do you remember that time that thing happened?
This is a bad thread and you should all feel bad |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 16:16:31
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
ShumaGorath wrote:They made Celestine even better. Was being 100 points under-costed not enough? Could they not admit to the typo? I think I would despise playing against the SoBs because of that one model. Thankfully I've never seen an SoB army before, so my rage is in check.
What typo? They did admit to the typo for StC. Unless you're trying to say the points cost is the typo... If that one model is really going to ruin the game for you, you might have larger problems.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 16:32:38
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
!!Goffik Rocker!!
(THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
|
pretre wrote:ShumaGorath wrote:They made Celestine even better. Was being 100 points under-costed not enough? Could they not admit to the typo? I think I would despise playing against the SoBs because of that one model. Thankfully I've never seen an SoB army before, so my rage is in check. What typo? They did admit to the typo for StC. Unless you're trying to say the points cost is the typo... If that one model is really going to ruin the game for you, you might have larger problems.  At 1500 or below Celestine is an unstoppable wrecking ball and is likely the most undercosted unit games workshop has produced in the last several additions. I don't play gray knights. I can't just whisk all my problems away with magic bs. She'd wreck my standard codex marines like theres no tomorrow. And yes, I believe that her cost is a typo. A 1 should be a two.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/12/12 16:35:31
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Do you remember that time that thing happened?
This is a bad thread and you should all feel bad |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 16:37:16
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
ShumaGorath wrote:At 1500 or below Celestine is an unstoppable wrecking ball and is likely the most undercosted unit games workshop has produced in the last several additions. I don't play gray knights. I can't just whisk all my problems away with magic bs. She'd wreck my standard codex marines like theres no tomorrow.
I think you misunderstand how Celestine actually functions in a real game.
She charges a marine unit. 6 Attacks, 4 Hit against WS 4. She kills 2 guys. You make your morale and she chills. She does this round after round, potentially getting lucky, or potentially taking a PF to the face. If she wins (or dies) she gets back up and charges something else. She is not a wrecking ball. She is an annoying scalpel that keeps jabbing into you and cannot be removed. Most importantly, she makes you irrational and distracts you from the rest of my army which is wrecking your standard codex marines like theres no tomorrow.
She is much more hilarious against GK or other high cost armies since she swings before them, kills a couple of their expensive minis and then dies, only to get up the following turn and do the same thing again and again. It costs them much more every time she kills a couple guys. Automatically Appended Next Post: Oh, and if she was 215, she wouldn't be taken. Although if you give her Eternal Warrior, I'd let you go to 215.
I think right now she is at a pretty good place points wise. She helps balance the rest of the codex.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/12/12 16:38:34
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 16:42:20
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Hooded Inquisitorial Interrogator
|
Yay on the Ogre Kingdoms stuff!!!
But I'm horribly disappointed in the Sister of Battle faith nerf...
So other armies get massive army wide rules (ATSKNF, stubborn/combat tactics/etc) and sisters get a 6+ invul save...and a faith system that was almost useless before this... yay.
*sigh* And I'll still play the army... but now I will field St Celestine to make up for the other deficiencies in the army...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 16:42:58
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Short read on SoB FAQ. I was hoping at least for a couple amendments that would make them suck less. Glad they cleared up Saint Celestine's status.
Noticed they haven't changed WD August 2011 mislabled image of "Retributor with Heavy Bolter" when in fact she's holding a Multimelta. Perhaps it will confuse the heck out opponents with WYSIWYG.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 16:46:43
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
!!Goffik Rocker!!
(THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
|
I think you misunderstand how Celestine actually functions in a real game.
No. Not really.
She charges a marine unit. 6 Attacks, 4 Hit against WS 4. She kills 2 guys.
Heavy flamer hits 5-6 and kills 2 before that. She charges, kills 2 with average rolls, PF likely fails its 33% chance to down her. Next round she kills two more. She either gets splatted or uses hit and run. Next round she uses the flamer and charges again, the squad has two models left and shes payed for herself 50% over.
She has on average two more chances to 2-round kill full squads.
She is not a wrecking ball. She is an annoying scalpel that keeps jabbing into you and cannot be removed.
Thats... Wrong. A character with a heavy flamer and that many poisoned power weapon attacks is a killing machine. She does more damage on average per turn than lysander.
Most importantly, she makes you irrational and distracts you from the rest of my army which is wrecking your standard codex marines like theres no tomorrow.
Imagine if Kayvan shrike costed less then a marine captain with nothing but a power weapon. Imagine that he couldn't die. Give him a heavy flamer. You now have celestine. You can't possibly tell me that's not broken.
She is much more hilarious against GK or other high cost armies since she swings before them, kills a couple of their expensive minis and then dies, only to get up the following turn and do the same thing again and again. It costs them much more every time she kills a couple guys.
Then why isn't she severely undercosted?
Oh, and if she was 215, she wouldn't be taken. Although if you give her Eternal Warrior, I'd let you go to 215.
I don't think you understand the dynamics of this game very well.
|
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Do you remember that time that thing happened?
This is a bad thread and you should all feel bad |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 16:54:56
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
ShumaGorath wrote:I don't think you understand the dynamics of this game very well.
Woah, slow down killer! No need to jump to personal attacks, we're having a difference of opinion on toy soldiers.
You have your opinion about the model, so go ahead and keep it. I will just say that my opinion is based on empirical facts gained from playing games for and against her. It is apparent that yours is based on theorycrafting. Take that as you will.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 16:56:48
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Hooded Inquisitorial Interrogator
|
ShumaGorath wrote: *snippet from previous post*
Personally, even as a sister of battle player, I think she is underpointed. I think she should be in the 185 range, personally... But that is if we look at a single model in the vacuum of model vs. point cost.
Now if you toss her in with the rest of my army and compare it to the horrible horrible train wreck my SoB codex is, I think we're allowed 1 item to ATTEMPT to make up for the stupidity that was thrust upon us... as a whole, this codex sucks, but the one bright gleaming hope it has, is named St. Celestine, and my opponents will at least respect HER if they can't respect my Sisters of Battle.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 16:59:12
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Revarien wrote:Personally, even as a sister of battle player, I think she is underpointed. I think she should be in the 185 range, personally... But that is if we look at a single model in the vacuum of model vs. point cost.
Which, as we know, models in armies are not generally costed in a vacuum. One of the many reasons I think she is at the right points cost.
I also disagree that the codex is a trainwreck, but oh well. I think we're still in a good place, even post FAQ.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 17:07:44
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
!!Goffik Rocker!!
(THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
|
Revarien wrote:ShumaGorath wrote: *snippet from previous post*
Personally, even as a sister of battle player, I think she is underpointed. I think she should be in the 185 range, personally... But that is if we look at a single model in the vacuum of model vs. point cost.
Now if you toss her in with the rest of my army and compare it to the horrible horrible train wreck my SoB codex is, I think we're allowed 1 item to ATTEMPT to make up for the stupidity that was thrust upon us... as a whole, this codex sucks, but the one bright gleaming hope it has, is named St. Celestine, and my opponents will at least respect HER if they can't respect my Sisters of Battle.
I don't think one awful design decision really makes up for the other, especially considering how much of the HQ slot is invalidated by celestines existence.
|
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Do you remember that time that thing happened?
This is a bad thread and you should all feel bad |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 17:13:25
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Auspicious Aspiring Champion of Chaos
|
On the Fantasy side: Also notable that the Greedy Fist apparently works at range. So the first time a boosted Caress of Laniph pops off, you're probably stripping all the magic levels off your target.
|
“It was in lands of the Chi-An where she finally ran him to ground. There she kissed him deeply as he lay dying, and so stole from him his last, agonized breath.
On a delicate chain at her throat, she keeps it with her to this day.”
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 17:15:15
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
!!Goffik Rocker!!
(THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
|
pretre wrote:ShumaGorath wrote:I don't think you understand the dynamics of this game very well.
Woah, slow down killer! No need to jump to personal attacks, we're having a difference of opinion on toy soldiers. You have your opinion about the model, so go ahead and keep it. I will just say that my opinion is based on empirical facts gained from playing games for and against her. It is apparent that yours is based on theorycrafting. Take that as you will. You directly described a situation wherein she pays for herself consistently and well without the use of clever tactics or skill. A unit should not be a no brainer breadwinner with no realistic counters, thats flawed design. Something that book/pages possessed a lot of.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/12/12 17:20:37
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Do you remember that time that thing happened?
This is a bad thread and you should all feel bad |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 17:25:10
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
ShumaGorath wrote:You directly described a situation wherein she pays for herself consistently and well without the use of clever tactics or skill. A unit should not be a no brainer breadwinner with no realistic counters, thats flawed design. Something that book possessed a lot of.
Chuckle @ 'well without the use of clever tactics or skill. '
Charge her with a large stubborn, fearless or resilient unit. I.e. a squad of gaunts, ork boys or IG blob. Laugh as she is stuck in combat for the next 3 hours.
Again, play some games with her and see how it actually works. Much like the rest of the codex, it behaves differently than the interwebs thinks it does.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/12/12 17:28:22
Subject: Sisters of Battle FAQ is up/ + new WFB FAQS too.
|
 |
!!Goffik Rocker!!
(THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
|
pretre wrote:ShumaGorath wrote:You directly described a situation wherein she pays for herself consistently and well without the use of clever tactics or skill. A unit should not be a no brainer breadwinner with no realistic counters, thats flawed design. Something that book possessed a lot of.
Chuckle @ 'well without the use of clever tactics or skill. ' Charge her with a large stubborn, fearless or resilient unit. I.e. a squad of gaunts, ork boys or IG blob. Laugh as she is stuck in combat for the next 3 hours. Again, play some games with her and see how it actually works. Much like the rest of the codex, it behaves differently than the interwebs thinks it does. You are aware of the fact that she has I7 and hit and run correct? She can't be tarpitted.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2011/12/12 17:29:50
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Do you remember that time that thing happened?
This is a bad thread and you should all feel bad |
|
 |
 |
|