Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Not sure if this is a news/rumors post or if general discussion would be better, apologies if so.

While reading the codex updates, what I am surprised no one is talking about, is what wasn't in the update.

The necrons, sisters and black templars were not mentioned. The necrons and sisters make sense, if the rules were in development at the same time as sisters/necrons, they wouldn't want to compound a problem of new rules and new codex, but why not templars?

Unless they are next??

Just pontificating, what do you all think?

I wrote some more detailed thoughts about it on my vanity, wait I mean hobby blog at http://armyundecided.blogspot.com/2012/01/what-we-can-infer-from-what-wasnt-in.html

Actually it is better posted in the Black Templar news&rumour thread, where this is already discussed.

Kroothawk wrote:Actually it is better posted in the Black Templar news&rumour thread, where this is already discussed.

Makes sense now. Where were you ten minutes ago when I was posting? Sheesh.