Switch Theme:

Tournements and OOP Models?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka






Glasgow, Scotland

A guy at my wargaming club has wanted to enter the 40k tournement scene lately. His army of choice is Imperial Guard. However every model in it (bar the Leman Russes and Chimeras) are the classic Aliens Colonial Marines rip offs that GW produced sometime in the eighties as a new line of Guard models that was discontinued. Now would the average tournement allow their use? I mean they are actually GW models, but they're also pretty old and its unlikely that anyone's ever heard of them other than die hard collectors. All the models are WYSIWYG-ie the smart gun is a heavy bolter, the flamer....is well a flamer. Oh and no, he doesn't intend to use the later run of minis that were produced by the designer after he had left GW (though he does use them in regular games).

Thoughts?
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran






The rule is, if GW printed it, he can play it. 40k models, unlike magic cards, do not ever become obsolete. EVER.
(provided there are still rules for the fig, that is.)

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/04/03 11:09:50


a million billion points
prepare to be purged
http://thewarmastersrevenge.blogspot.com  
   
Made in us
[ARTICLE MOD]
Fixture of Dakka






Chicago

Why not?

   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka






Glasgow, Scotland

Its my understanding that they don't allow OOP vehicles like the Land Raider kit, thus it was my thinking that it translated to infantry. He wants to be certain that he can actually play with the army before he finishes it though (like I said his current one is made from two ranges, so if he wants to play one totally from the GW one he'd need to paint up some limited edition figures).
   
Made in us
[ARTICLE MOD]
Fixture of Dakka






Chicago

I haven't played in a tournament that disallowed a GW model.

I think it's really up to your Tournament Organizer - I'd check with him.

   
Made in us
Nigel Stillman





Austin, TX

Wyrmalla wrote:A guy at my wargaming club has wanted to enter the 40k tournement scene lately. His army of choice is Imperial Guard. However every model in it (bar the Leman Russes and Chimeras) are the classic Aliens Colonial Marines rip offs that GW produced sometime in the eighties as a new line of Guard models that was discontinued. Now would the average tournement allow their use? I mean they are actually GW models, but they're also pretty old and its unlikely that anyone's ever heard of them other than die hard collectors. All the models are WYSIWYG-ie the smart gun is a heavy bolter, the flamer....is well a flamer. Oh and no, he doesn't intend to use the later run of minis that were produced by the designer after he had left GW (though he does use them in regular games).

Thoughts?


My thought is that I'm curious as to why this even bothers you. They're GW models, and they're WYSIWYG. They also look a thousand times better than the plastic IG crapadians and crapachans we have today. The only "old" GW model I've have some problem playing is the old Avatar which was the size of a space marine, not a monstrous creature

Obviously you think something is wrong otherwise you wouldn't have bothered to write a paragraph about it, so what's up?

Kind Regards,
Vladsimpaler

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/04/03 14:06:10


 
   
Made in es
Sneaky Striking Scorpion




Madrid

Vladsimpaler wrote:
Wyrmalla wrote:A guy at my wargaming club has wanted to enter the 40k tournement scene lately. His army of choice is Imperial Guard. However every model in it (bar the Leman Russes and Chimeras) are the classic Aliens Colonial Marines rip offs that GW produced sometime in the eighties as a new line of Guard models that was discontinued. Now would the average tournement allow their use? I mean they are actually GW models, but they're also pretty old and its unlikely that anyone's ever heard of them other than die hard collectors. All the models are WYSIWYG-ie the smart gun is a heavy bolter, the flamer....is well a flamer. Oh and no, he doesn't intend to use the later run of minis that were produced by the designer after he had left GW (though he does use them in regular games).

Thoughts?


My thought is that I'm curious as to why this even bothers you. They're GW models, and they're WYSIWYG. They also look a thousand times better than the plastic IG crapadians and crapachans we have today. The only "old" GW model I've have some problem playing is the old Avatar which was the size of a space marine, not a monstrous creature

Obviously you think something is wrong otherwise you wouldn't have bothered to write a paragraph about it, so what's up?

Kind Regards,
Vladsimpaler


Anyway, with GW not supporting the Tournments anymore it wouldn't raise any eyebrows if GW models weren't required.

5.000 2.000

"The stars themselves once lived and died at our command, yet you still dare to oppose our will."

Never Forgive, Never Forget
 
   
Made in us
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge





Boston, MA

GW models are GW models forever. Even if there aren't rules for a particular thing, you can usually find a suitable counts as. My Thudd Gun is a Thunderfire Cannon, my Rapier is a Conversion Beamer, and so on.

Check out my Youtube channel!
 
   
Made in us
Sister Vastly Superior




Colorado

I know a guy who while he no longer plays the hobby still has all his old miniatures including a few models that were literally cardboard cutouts that when you turn them sideways are near impossible to see from certain directions. Made true line of sight a bitch but he only jokingly used them anyways. As far as I am aware they are still tournament legal, so I don't see an issue with actual models on bases.

When in doubt burn it, then burn yourself for doubting. 
   
Made in us
Heroic Senior Officer





Western Kentucky

IcedAnimals wrote:I know a guy who while he no longer plays the hobby still has all his old miniatures including a few models that were literally cardboard cutouts that when you turn them sideways are near impossible to see from certain directions. Made true line of sight a bitch but he only jokingly used them anyways. As far as I am aware they are still tournament legal, so I don't see an issue with actual models on bases.


Isn't there some sort of cardboard Deff Dred that is legal for tourney use that everyone hates? I remember hearing about it and getting a good laugh. I didn't know there were others though.

'I've played Guard for years, and the best piece of advice is to always utilize the Guard's best special rule: "we roll more dice than you" ' - stormleader

"Sector Imperialis: 25mm and 40mm Round Bases (40+20) 26€ (Including 32 skulls for basing) " GW design philosophy in a nutshell  
   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka






Glasgow, Scotland

Vladsimpaler wrote:
Wyrmalla wrote:A guy at my wargaming club has wanted to enter the 40k tournement scene lately. His army of choice is Imperial Guard. However every model in it (bar the Leman Russes and Chimeras) are the classic Aliens Colonial Marines rip offs that GW produced sometime in the eighties as a new line of Guard models that was discontinued. Now would the average tournement allow their use? I mean they are actually GW models, but they're also pretty old and its unlikely that anyone's ever heard of them other than die hard collectors. All the models are WYSIWYG-ie the smart gun is a heavy bolter, the flamer....is well a flamer. Oh and no, he doesn't intend to use the later run of minis that were produced by the designer after he had left GW (though he does use them in regular games).

Thoughts?


My thought is that I'm curious as to why this even bothers you. They're GW models, and they're WYSIWYG. They also look a thousand times better than the plastic IG crapadians and crapachans we have today. The only "old" GW model I've have some problem playing is the old Avatar which was the size of a space marine, not a monstrous creature

Obviously you think something is wrong otherwise you wouldn't have bothered to write a paragraph about it, so what's up?

Kind Regards,
Vladsimpaler


That last bit sounded a little judgemental, but whatever. Like I said, he really wants to be certain that its allowable before he takes the plunge and starts paiting up some old models. He'll be contacting the tournement organisors at some point, but he doesn't know when his army'll be finished so doesn't really want to jump the gun a little. The main issue is that their pretty obscure and I would have imagined that their authentisity would be called into question, as was I confused over the point that the older vehicle kits were no longer allowed.
   
Made in gb
Roaring Reaver Rider






Warwickshire

Someone in my FLGS contantly goes to tournaments and fields several squads of old style termies and a tiny OOP Rhino (a baby Rhino lol )

Nom

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/04/04 08:18:58


 
   
Made in us
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets






GreatGunz wrote:The rule is, if GW printed it, he can play it. 40k models, unlike magic cards, do not ever become obsolete. EVER.
(provided there are still rules for the fig, that is.)


Funny, this was the same argument I used when a Magic player said we were stupid for playing Warhammer...

In short, yes, as long as it fairly represents what you are claiming it os, no TO who doesn't have some stupid axe to grind will turn you away. I have seen lots of old rhinos where I play, and no one gets bent out of shape about them. Haven't heard a cross word about ky old hive tyrant or carnifexes, either.
   
Made in us
Legendary Dogfighter




Garden Grove, CA

In the tourney I'm going to, it's fine as long as he's not doing it to model for advantage, like the tiny Avatar.

"Do not practice until you get it right, practice until you can not get it wrong." In other words, stop effing up.
 
   
Made in gb
Joined the Military for Authentic Experience





On an Express Elevator to Hell!!

Wyrmalla wrote:Like I said, he really wants to be certain that its allowable before he takes the plunge and starts paiting up some old models. He'll be contacting the tournement organisors at some point, but he doesn't know when his army'll be finished so doesn't really want to jump the gun a little. The main issue is that their pretty obscure and I would have imagined that their authentisity would be called into question, as was I confused over the point that the older vehicle kits were no longer allowed.


Are there even any more GW supported tournaments that dictate that all GW models are required?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/04/04 09:04:55


Epic 30K&40K! A new players guide, contributors welcome https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/751316.page
 
   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka






Glasgow, Scotland

Pacific wrote:
Wyrmalla wrote:Like I said, he really wants to be certain that its allowable before he takes the plunge and starts paiting up some old models. He'll be contacting the tournement organisors at some point, but he doesn't know when his army'll be finished so doesn't really want to jump the gun a little. The main issue is that their pretty obscure and I would have imagined that their authentisity would be called into question, as was I confused over the point that the older vehicle kits were no longer allowed.


Are there even any more GW supported tournaments that dictate that all GW models are required?


Not a clue, he just seems to think it would be required at most. I'm not really the one that wants to know, just querying for a guy without any forums. =P
   
Made in us
Martial Arts Fiday






Nashville, TN

I'd like to see these models. hey don't sound like anything I've ever seen by GW.

"Holy Sh*&, you've opened my eyes and changed my mind about this topic, thanks Dakka OT!"

-Nobody Ever

Proverbs 18:2

"CHEESE!" is the battlecry of the ill-prepared.

 warboss wrote:

GW didn't mean to hit your wallet and I know they love you, baby. I'm sure they won't do it again so it's ok to purchase and make up.


Albatross wrote:I think SlaveToDorkness just became my new hero.

EmilCrane wrote:Finecast is the new Matt Ward.

Don't mess with the Blade and Bolter! 
   
Made in us
Nurgle Predator Driver with an Infestation





Lawrence Ks

All the IG models are about the same size. The older models are just a little smaller, Like plague marines and the new plastic kits. Like its been said, there should be much reason as to why they can't be used. But its really up to the TO in this case. Personally i would play against some one using the older models. That includes the old land raider or rhino. I have played against ork players who have small tanks then the old land raider. And there hasn't been an issue.

Pigs is beautiful

"People Judge you on how your labels smell"

"Some times I just like to use my fingers" Bob Ross
2000 pts 2000 pts
Check out da Blog http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/435282.page

For gaming in KS/MO check out www.Frostreaver.net 
   
Made in gb
Blood Angel Neophyte Undergoing Surgeries







Wyrmalla wrote:A guy at my wargaming club has wanted to enter the 40k tournement scene lately. His army of choice is Imperial Guard. However every model in it (bar the Leman Russes and Chimeras) are the classic Aliens Colonial Marines rip offs that GW produced sometime in the eighties as a new line of Guard models that was discontinued. Now would the average tournement allow their use? I mean they are actually GW models, but they're also pretty old and its unlikely that anyone's ever heard of them other than die hard collectors. All the models are WYSIWYG-ie the smart gun is a heavy bolter, the flamer....is well a flamer. Oh and no, he doesn't intend to use the later run of minis that were produced by the designer after he had left GW (though he does use them in regular games).

Thoughts?


Ask on Warhammer Worlds facebook wall, they're pretty clue'd up (and rightly so) or run it by the organiser =)

6k of flesh tearers and counting.... 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: