| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/25 18:39:08
Subject: Lash of Submission vs. Ever-Living
|
 |
Tail-spinning Tomb Blade Pilot
All kinds of places at once
|
If a necron unit is affected by lash of submission and is killed by the shooting attacks from the rest of the unit the lashing psyker is attached to, where do they make their ever-living rolls from?
This came up in a game at adepticon, and I talked to the judge and my opponent and brainstormed how it should be resolved. We decided that the models should be moved before they die. The reason we did this is because lash has three parts (to hit, 2d6 movement, and the pinning test) and normal shooting has 3 parts (to hit, to wound, and armor saves). For simplicity's sake, we assumed that the three different parts each happen at the same time as their parallel. That is to say both rolls to hit are simultaneous, rolls to wound and the 2d6 movement for lash are simultaneous, and the armor saves for the affected unit, as well as their pinning test, is last.
I believe that the RaW might say something else, but I can't be sure. If they don't, does Dakka think that the way we chose to resolve it is the best way?
Thanks,
Kitzz
|
Check out my project, 41.0, which aims to completely rewrite 40k!
Yngir theme song:
I get knocked down, but I get up again, you're never gonna keep me down; I get knocked down...
Lordhat wrote:Just because the codexes are the exactly the same, does not mean that that they're the same codex. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/25 18:42:32
Subject: Lash of Submission vs. Ever-Living
|
 |
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre
|
Well damn.
Techincally, the movement part of lash is the result of the power, and since it happens at the same time yet you take a pinning test at the end of the I'll say you die after the move. Just guessing here.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/25 18:44:41
Subject: Lash of Submission vs. Ever-Living
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
You die after the move. The move is a PSA so happens simultaneously with the shooting.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/25 18:51:26
Subject: Lash of Submission vs. Ever-Living
|
 |
The Hive Mind
|
Agreed with above.
|
My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/25 18:54:55
Subject: Lash of Submission vs. Ever-Living
|
 |
Troubled By Non-Compliant Worlds
|
Because they died from the same unit that the lash came from those are considered to have happened at the same time. he comes back from the point he died.
I think in the We'll Be back, or ever living or whatever its called now they have some wiggle room to the tune of 3 or so inches that they can come back from.
|
Space marines
:tyranid: Tyranid
and a smattering of chaos |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/25 19:04:02
Subject: Lash of Submission vs. Ever-Living
|
 |
Tail-spinning Tomb Blade Pilot
New York, USA
|
I agree that your model dies where the lash brought him, but remember that EL allows you to ressurect 3" away from where you dies(but must be 1" away from an enemy model)
|
"Surrender and Die."
"To an Immortal, to one among a legion, honor and your word are all that matter" - Phaeron Orionis of the Brotherhood
W-L-D
6-1-3 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|