| Poll |
 |
|
|
 |
| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/12 12:13:32
Subject: Is the Necron Tomb Stalker a little underwhelming? Should it reworked to fit the new codex?
|
 |
Courageous Space Marine Captain
|
I recently had a look at the FW Tomb Stalker and was, well, I said meh. Anyone else find this? Should we remake it to fit into the new codex?
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/05/14 18:32:59
I'm celebrating 8 years on Dakka Dakka!
I started an Instagram! Follow me at Deadshot Miniatures!
DR:90+S++G+++M+B+IPw40k08#-D+++A+++/cwd363R+++T(Ot)DM+
Check out my Deathwatch story, Aftermath in the fiction section!
Credit to Castiel for banner. Thanks Cas!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/12 12:23:07
Subject: Is the Necron Tomb Stalker a little underwhelming? Should it reworked to fit the new codex?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
It's a big fire magnet basically with a high point cost. It does have great toughness and 5 wounds. You already have C'Tan shards that do a very similar thing with a smaller footprint and offer more for your army that the Tomb Stalker does. Shards also take up an Elite slot, which is more forgiving than losing Heavy Support. You have cheaper and more effective options there than a Tomb Stalker is.
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/05/12 12:24:53
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/12 13:46:12
Subject: Is the Necron Tomb Stalker a little underwhelming? Should it reworked to fit the new codex?
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
For one thing, it could use much better guns. 2 Gauss Flayers? How is that intimidating? Maybe give it Gauss Blasters/Tesla Carbines instead
To also show its massive bulk when moving, maybe also give it a similar ability to the Trygon tunneling and allow someone else to use their hole? Be a great scarab delivery system
Still its not like the Stalker isnt all that bad. For one thing its very resistant to poison, a weakness many MC face
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/05/12 13:47:32
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/12 18:38:08
Subject: Is the Necron Tomb Stalker a little underwhelming? Should it reworked to fit the new codex?
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
Remember that this was designed before the new Codex was written, so Tesla weapons are out of the picture, although they may be included in a later version of IA. Yes, it's a pretty hefty point sink but remember this is a T7 5 wound Monstrous Creature (slightly better than a C'tan) which can Deep Strike behind cover, then charge without needing LoS. While it's not highly competitive I'd say it doesn't really need any improvements, maybe except the Tesla upgrade mentioned before.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/14 17:52:38
Subject: Is the Necron Tomb Stalker a little underwhelming? Should it reworked to fit the new codex?
|
 |
Warp-Screaming Noise Marine
Canada!
|
I'm Imagining a hilarious Necron zilla list right now advancing under the cover of wraiths of turbo boosted tomb blades.
I guess you could also have some spyders in there and a squad of scarabs to add another dimension, but boy is this costing an arm and a leg without picking up troops yet.
I wish C'tan were more reasonably costed. None of the upgrades are all that exciting and he is vulnerable to small arms fire without any movement options. I'm sure the tomb stalker will get a revamp in the next imperial armor though.
I feel like giving it a +5 invulnerable save goes a long way to making it more sturdy. To symbolize it's greater initiative, it could have something similar to whip coils. Maybe something that helps with it's deep strike or provides stealth the turn after it arrives?
|
It's just a show, I should really just relax... It's just a show, I should really just relax... It's just a show, I should really just relax... It's just a show, I should really just relax... |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/14 18:26:22
Subject: Is the Necron Tomb Stalker a little underwhelming? Should it reworked to fit the new codex?
|
 |
Sadistic Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
A 5+* would be appreciated. I use one myself. Against Guard, Nids and Dark Eldar its a really pain. Strength 3 is pointless. Fleet is a godsend in a Necron army (lots of Dangerous Terrain test for Jump Infantry). I refuse to buy Wraiths (don't like the models and won't jump on the bandwagon) so I go with a Praetorian heavy list. They tie units up and let the Tomb Stalker advance unmolested. It's only just more expensive than the C'tan but is much better against small arms fire. I feel the Shards aren't fast enough for Necrons and the special rules aren't worth the points.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/14 21:49:43
Subject: Is the Necron Tomb Stalker a little underwhelming? Should it reworked to fit the new codex?
|
 |
Courageous Space Marine Captain
|
Ok, so having looked over your reviews and the current rules I think it should have the following
Ws 4
Bs 4
Str 7(+1)
T 7
W 5
Int 4
A 4
Ld 10
Sv 3+
Wargear
2 Gauss Flayers
Special Rule
Sensory Cluster
Phase Tunneling
(All of normal stuff) In addition, it also counts as having a phase shifter
War Construct
Brutal Assault
(All normal stuff) In addition, because of its aggression and size, a Tomb Stalker counts as having Frag Grenades
Options
May replace Gauss Flayers with
Tesla Carbines for free
Gauss Blasters 15pt
Tesla (second weakness Tesla weapon) 15pts
Gauss Cannons 35pts
Tesla Cannon 35pts
Heavy Gauss Cannon 55pts
Tesla Destructor (the one that Arcs) 55pts
What do you think? And base price of 225 for the Frag Grenades and Phase Shifter, 30pts more than the current one.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/05/14 21:50:49
I'm celebrating 8 years on Dakka Dakka!
I started an Instagram! Follow me at Deadshot Miniatures!
DR:90+S++G+++M+B+IPw40k08#-D+++A+++/cwd363R+++T(Ot)DM+
Check out my Deathwatch story, Aftermath in the fiction section!
Credit to Castiel for banner. Thanks Cas!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/15 09:43:35
Subject: Is the Necron Tomb Stalker a little underwhelming? Should it reworked to fit the new codex?
|
 |
Daemonic Dreadnought
|
I have a kit for the Stalker that i havn'tr built yet. i'm tempted to wait until the next IA book to see what happens.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/15 14:50:15
Subject: Is the Necron Tomb Stalker a little underwhelming? Should it reworked to fit the new codex?
|
 |
Proud Triarch Praetorian
|
Every time I see the Forgeworld Tomb Stalker I can't help but think,
"Aww, that's not the titan the described from the Medusa V incident..."
(here's hoping IA12 fixes that?)
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/15 14:52:42
Subject: Is the Necron Tomb Stalker a little underwhelming? Should it reworked to fit the new codex?
|
 |
Daemonic Dreadnought
|
I want to think they will make a new funky Necron titan. but i am worried they will default to the "MegaLith" which woudl be
a) a shame
b) HUGE
c) Exorbitantly expensive
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|