Switch Theme:

Designer mistake on Cadian Models?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Drop Trooper with Demo Charge





Is it just me or is there a glaring fault on the cadians?

If you look at their belts front and behind you notice this:


If you look carefully you will notice at the back, there is a strap coming up from the belt as part of the suspension system, but it does not meet the front half of the belt as it should!
   
Made in au
Anti-Armour Swiss Guard






Newcastle, OZ

Standing model is a single cast figure.
Normal cadian is multipose plastics.

Not surprised there are differences. Some things need to be changed on a multipose otherwise they would look wrong (and that suspension system strapping would look wrong with the torso twisted either way (it wouldn't look the way it was supposed to because plastic mandollies don't behave like real people).

I'm OVER 50 (and so far over everyone's BS, too).
Old enough to know better, young enough to not give a ****.

That is not dead which can eternal lie ...

... and yet, with strange aeons, even death may die.
 
   
Made in gb
Drop Trooper with Demo Charge





Plastics are the same. I just posted that pic because it is unobstructed. If they were doing multipose they could have maybe attached the belt to the top torso. Or they could have omitted the back strap completely as the same thing would apply there.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/05/15 07:37:13


 
   
Made in gb
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander





Ramsden Heath, Essex

The back strap adds texture/variance where there would otherwise be a plain bit of cloth.

This is not needed at the front where there is already quie a bit going on. Besides with the amount of gap at the front would you even notice straps there, probably not. Plus no one would hank you for having to paint something that fiddley x 120 men.

Fluff answer: in 38000 years they managed to find a better way of doing it negating the need for front straps.

How do you promote your Hobby? - Legoburner "I run some crappy wargaming website " 
   
Made in nl
Esteemed Veteran Space Marine





the Netherlands

it might be attached to the armor between his shoulders?

   
Made in gb
Leader of the Sept







Also most moderns soldiers who wear load support straps dont have magical shell armour over their torso. Maybe the flack vest provides enough load support over the shoulders that they don;t need to attach clips back to the belt. All the back strap does is help clip the ammo and water pouches to the torso armour.

Please excuse any spelling errors. I use a tablet frequently and software keyboards are a pain!

Terranwing - w3;d1;l1
51st Dunedinw2;d0;l0
Cadre Coronal Afterglow w1;d0;l0 
   
Made in gb
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General




We'll find out soon enough eh.

On the Hammer Pant'ed, football helmet'ed, gorilla hand'ed Cadian plastics, -this- was the issue that you decided was the glaring flaw?

I need to acquire plastic Skavenslaves, can you help?
I have a blog now, evidently. Featuring the Alternative Mordheim Model Megalist.

"Your society's broken, so who should we blame? Should we blame the rich, powerful people who caused it? No, lets blame the people with no power and no money and those immigrants who don't even have the vote. Yea, it must be their fething fault." - Iain M Banks
-----
"The language of modern British politics is meant to sound benign. But words do not mean what they seem to mean. 'Reform' actually means 'cut' or 'end'. 'Flexibility' really means 'exploit'. 'Prudence' really means 'don't invest'. And 'efficient'? That means whatever you want it to mean, usually 'cut'. All really mean 'keep wages low for the masses, taxes low for the rich, profits high for the corporations, and accept the decline in public services and amenities this will cause'." - Robin McAlpine from Common Weal 
   
 
Forum Index » Painting & Modeling
Go to: