Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

ok, had a debate last night, that I would love some input on..

a str 5 empire general is attacking a dreadlod with pendant, does the pendant still work

runefang for all those who dont know , basically says if it hits it wounds.

my opponent was saying that there is no str attached to the attack that the pendant would not work vs runefang

my argument was that even though the weapon says if he hits , he still wounds at a str 5, so i would still get a reverse 5 down ward.

please give me some insight on this

Thank guys, i might have been wrong on what his general str was, but that is besides that pooint i was trying to ask, i apprecaite everyone's input on this, My opponent is a good friend of mine and it was not a heated debate, I just wanted some clarification on it