Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Ryan_A wrote:Alright, so I was wondering if my thought process was correct about anti armor: My options for survivable anti armor were:
1. Devastator Squad 10 man, 3 lascanons, 1 heavy bolter- 290
Pros: Wound allocation
Cons: Expensive, Easily killed, No portability,

Fairly sure wound allocation can only be done with units with multiple wounds per model, such as Nobz and Paladins. I'm guessing you mean abalative wounds? I wouldn't overlook devastators though. They are expensive, but put them in a ruin and suddenly they're a lot more survivable.

I would echo Doomhunter with regards to the Land Raider; easily the most durable choice. Redundancy is the key word though.