Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 16:47:58
Subject: On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
Units on the roof of a bastion can be fired upon, however, what is their cover save? Is it a fortification cover save of 3+? or something else?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 17:16:16
Subject: On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
|
It counts as a battlement, what is the cover save of that?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 17:25:52
Subject: On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
exactly what I was trying to find. page 95 covers battlements, and page 18 handles cover saves.
The Bastion is a fortification, so I was assuming it would be the same save as a fortification, however, I want to know for sure.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 17:26:23
Subject: Re:On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Battlements don't have a defined cover save (that I can find).
Since Fortifications have a 3+, I'd guess the models in cover on the roof of a Bastion (as well as vehicles obscured by the Bastion) would get a 3+ cover save. But I think this will really have to come down to agreement with your opponent before the beginning of the game.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 17:33:41
Subject: On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
I suppose since battlements are just part of the fortification that makes sense that a fortification save is what what you would get.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 17:40:26
Subject: On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Huge Hierodule
|
3+ for fortifications.
Fortress of redemption gives same 3+ cover save on its battlements as well.
Aegis defense line is a defense line so it gives 4+ with a 2+ if you go to ground.
Skyshield gives a 4+ invulnerable when closed, and no cover save when unfurled.
|
Been out of the game for awhile, trying to find time to get back into it. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 18:05:55
Subject: Re:On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
Long Island, New York, USA
|
From the main rules page 95 under 'Battlements', second paragraph.
"...units on battlements can be shot at, and will have to rely on their armour (and any cover saves from the battlement walls) for protection."
And under 'Barricades and Walls' on page 104, walls give a basic 4+ cover save.
So on a battlement with walls, 4+ and on the roof of a bastion with no walls, no cover save.
|
I have found again and again that in encounter actions, the day goes to the side that is the first to plaster its opponent with fire. The man who lies low and awaits developments usually comes off second best. - Erwin Rommel
"For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged, by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions, even on important subjects, which I once thought right but found to be otherwise." - Benjamin Franklin
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 18:09:40
Subject: Re:On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
p104 are rules for Battlefield Debris. Walls of a fortification or building are not Battlefield Debris, they are part of the building that they are attached to.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/13 20:01:42
Subject: Re:On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
Long Island, New York, USA
|
Buildings, which battlements are, do not have cover saves, they have AVs.
The passage I quoted tells you that in a battlement you get a cover save from the battlement's walls.
The cover saves for a wall is given on page 104.
The aegis defence line is listed on page 114, but that entry doesn't give any cover save for it.
Page 104 definse defence lines and says it follows the same rules for barricades and walls and gives the increase in cover saves.
That's what tells what the cover save for the aegis defence line is.
You need to look in 2 different places in the rules.
|
I have found again and again that in encounter actions, the day goes to the side that is the first to plaster its opponent with fire. The man who lies low and awaits developments usually comes off second best. - Erwin Rommel
"For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged, by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions, even on important subjects, which I once thought right but found to be otherwise." - Benjamin Franklin
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 01:55:53
Subject: On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Huge Hierodule
|
Bastions and fortresses of redemption are fortifications and thus give 3+ cover. Period.
|
Been out of the game for awhile, trying to find time to get back into it. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 02:30:44
Subject: On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
Rule book clearly states 3+ save on battlements
Related question: Comm relay works in unit is within 2". If unit is in Bastion, would you say they are within 2" of relay? I say no, but a friend of mine had a good counter point. If you are occupying a structure, wouldn't another part of that structure have to count as within 2". I'm really not sure on this. Thoughts?
|
DO:70S++G++M+B++I+Pw40k93/f#++D++++A++++/eWD-R++++T(D)DM+
Note: Records since 2010, lists kept current (W-D-L) Blue DP Crusade 126-11-6 Biel-Tan Aspect Waves 2-0-2 Looted Green Horde smash your face in 32-7-8 Broadside/Shield Drone/Kroot blitz goodness 23-3-4 Grey Hunters galore 17-5-5 Khan Bikes Win 63-1-1 Tanith with Pardus Armor 11-0-0 Crimson Tide 59-4-0 Green/Raven/Deathwing 18-0-0 Jumping GK force with Inq. 4-0-0 BTemplars w LRs 7-1-2 IH Legion with Automata 8-0-0 RG Legion w Adepticon medal 6-0-0 Primaris and Little Buddies 7-0-0
QM Templates here, HH army builder app for both v1 and v2
One Page 40k Ruleset for Game Beginners |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 04:42:07
Subject: On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
|
Considering you have to forfeit your entire movement to move to another section of the building, I don't think you are actually as close as you infer. That said, I could be entirely wrong.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 13:32:59
Subject: On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
Long Island, New York, USA
|
Lobukia wrote:Rule book clearly states 3+ save on battlements
Page reference please?
Because the rule on page 95 that I referenced above clearly states, "...units on battlements can be shot at, and will have to rely on their armour ( and any cover saves from the battlement walls) for protection." {emphasis mine}
I don't see where it states units on battlements get a 3+ cover save.
|
I have found again and again that in encounter actions, the day goes to the side that is the first to plaster its opponent with fire. The man who lies low and awaits developments usually comes off second best. - Erwin Rommel
"For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged, by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions, even on important subjects, which I once thought right but found to be otherwise." - Benjamin Franklin
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 14:02:18
Subject: On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Huge Hierodule
|
Page 18, BRB, 2nd column, Top of page:
Cover Type
Razor wire 6+
Forests and area terrain 5+
Ruins, ruined fortifications, and trenchs 4+
Fortifications 3+
A bastion and a F. o. R. are both fortifications. They qualify to grant 3+ cover. A ruined fortification (for example, a dilapidated one placed neutrally) would grant the 4+ you're inferring.
|
Been out of the game for awhile, trying to find time to get back into it. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 14:12:27
Subject: Re:On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
Long Island, New York, USA
|
They are not the same.
A fortification grants a 3+ save for being in the fortification.
Look at page 95, the first paragraph on the left hand side under "Battlements".
One unit can be inside a building with a battlement since it is a mulitple part building, "...and a different unit can be 'on top' of it..."
A unit that is on a battlement is not in the building or fortification so therefore cannot benefit from a cover save that being inside grants.
So once again, the relevant rule is, "...units on battlements can be shot at, and will have to rely on their armour (and any cover saves from the battlement walls) for protection." {emphasis mine}
Read it carefully please, "units on battlements". These are not units that are inside buildings. There's a big difference.
|
I have found again and again that in encounter actions, the day goes to the side that is the first to plaster its opponent with fire. The man who lies low and awaits developments usually comes off second best. - Erwin Rommel
"For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged, by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions, even on important subjects, which I once thought right but found to be otherwise." - Benjamin Franklin
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 14:14:45
Subject: On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Huge Hierodule
|
Time wizard, stop being obtuse on purpose.
A unit INSIDE a fortification cannot be shot and cannot take cover saves from grenades or flamers that effect it, nor can take cover saves from wounds inflicted by glancing/penetrating the fortification. The cover save rule is clearly for the piece itself when models are on top of and behind it.
Again, stop trolling and just use common sense.
|
Been out of the game for awhile, trying to find time to get back into it. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 14:45:34
Subject: Re:On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
Long Island, New York, USA
|
Excues me. I am not being obtuse and I am certainly not trolling.
I have pointed out repeatedly that a battlement is not a fortification. A battlement is a part of a building.
Read the Battlement section on page 95, I really think you are misunderstanding the difference between a building and a battlement.
Here's something to hopefully illustrate the difference.
Page 114 starts the pages on fortifications. You'll see the Aegis Devence Lines. They are classed as Fortifications and cost a number of points. So do models behind the Aegis line get a 3+ cover save? No.
Look at the entry. The terain type is Battlefield Debris (Defence lines).
Now go to page 104. Defence lines follow the same rules for barricades and walls. And a model in cover behind a barricade or wall gets a 4+ cover save.
So models in the defence line fortification only get a 4+ cover save.
Units on a battlement are on top of a building, not in a building, and even if they were considered to be in a fortification, they by rule only get the cover save granted by the walls of the battlement, a 4+.
If you place a piece of terrain on the field, like a trench, you could agree that it grants a 4+ cover save as per page 18, or you could agree that it is a fortified trench, in which case it would grant a 3+ cover save for being a fortification.
That would give you the cover save defined in the table on page 18. This is a set of generic saves for cover. You still have to use the relevant rules for a particular piece of terrain.
I hope I have presented my case in a manner consistant with the posting rules of this forum. If you believe I am trolling, please report me to a moderator.
|
I have found again and again that in encounter actions, the day goes to the side that is the first to plaster its opponent with fire. The man who lies low and awaits developments usually comes off second best. - Erwin Rommel
"For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged, by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions, even on important subjects, which I once thought right but found to be otherwise." - Benjamin Franklin
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 14:54:03
Subject: Re:On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Crazed Spirit of the Defiler
|
time wizard wrote:Excues me. I am not being obtuse and I am certainly not trolling.
I have pointed out repeatedly that a battlement is not a fortification. A battlement is a part of a building.
Read the Battlement section on page 95, I really think you are misunderstanding the difference between a building and a battlement.
Here's something to hopefully illustrate the difference.
Page 114 starts the pages on fortifications. You'll see the Aegis Devence Lines. They are classed as Fortifications and cost a number of points. So do models behind the Aegis line get a 3+ cover save? No.
Look at the entry. The terain type is Battlefield Debris (Defence lines).
Now go to page 104. Defence lines follow the same rules for barricades and walls. And a model in cover behind a barricade or wall gets a 4+ cover save.
So models in the defence line fortification only get a 4+ cover save.
Units on a battlement are on top of a building, not in a building, and even if they were considered to be in a fortification, they by rule only get the cover save granted by the walls of the battlement, a 4+.
If you place a piece of terrain on the field, like a trench, you could agree that it grants a 4+ cover save as per page 18, or you could agree that it is a fortified trench, in which case it would grant a 3+ cover save for being a fortification.
That would give you the cover save defined in the table on page 18. This is a set of generic saves for cover. You still have to use the relevant rules for a particular piece of terrain.
I hope I have presented my case in a manner consistant with the posting rules of this forum. If you believe I am trolling, please report me to a moderator.
Alright, then. What would you say IS a fortification?
|
If you see slaanesh, just look away.
"I can't look away!!!"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 15:05:08
Subject: Re:On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
Long Island, New York, USA
|
Wrakkar wrote:Alright, then. What would you say IS a fortification?
A fortified trench, or a fortified bunker, or a fortified waaagh tower. Whatever you and your opponent decide is a fortification that grants the 3+ cover save.
A skyshiled landing pad is in the 'fortification' section. It even says on page 115 that it's a fortification.
So do units on the landing pad get a 3+ cover save? No. The special rule of the 'fortification' says they get a 4++ save.
An imperial bastion is a fortification. Do units inside get a 3+ cover save? No. You cannot directly attack units inside a building, main rules page 93.
Note the entry for the imperial bastion on page 116, its terrain type is medium building. As such, it follows the rules for buildings.
And units in buildings do not get cover saves.
|
I have found again and again that in encounter actions, the day goes to the side that is the first to plaster its opponent with fire. The man who lies low and awaits developments usually comes off second best. - Erwin Rommel
"For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged, by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions, even on important subjects, which I once thought right but found to be otherwise." - Benjamin Franklin
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 15:14:56
Subject: Re:On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Daring Dark Eldar Raider Rider
|
I agree with time wizard on this one. Say I havea home made bastion with me. Now on top of the bastion for battlement walls I have barbed wire. Do the models up there behind it automatically get a 3+ cover save because the bastion is a fortification? No. They get the 6+ for barbed wire.
If the modeled battlements are reinforced steel plates with anti-rocket cages on them, you would be able to argue it is a fortification. It all depends on what it is modelled to look like and what you and your opponent agree to.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/14 15:15:41
Alone in the warp. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 15:18:19
Subject: Re:On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
Long Island, New York, USA
|
Dannyevilguy wrote: If the modeled battlements are reinforced steel plates with anti-rocket cages on them, you would be able to argue it is a fortification. It all depends on what it is modelled to look like and what you and your opponent agree to.
True. You could have a battlement or the roof of a bastion that has no walls whatever. So you might agree with your opponent that models placed up there get no cover save at all.
Or you could put walls up there and agree with your opponent that they are fortified walls and as such grant a 3+ cover save instead of the 4+ for walls.
It just that being on top of the bastion does not automatically grant a 3+ cover save. That part is just wrong.
|
I have found again and again that in encounter actions, the day goes to the side that is the first to plaster its opponent with fire. The man who lies low and awaits developments usually comes off second best. - Erwin Rommel
"For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged, by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions, even on important subjects, which I once thought right but found to be otherwise." - Benjamin Franklin
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 18:55:45
Subject: Re:On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Huge Hierodule
|
time wizard wrote:Dannyevilguy wrote: If the modeled battlements are reinforced steel plates with anti-rocket cages on them, you would be able to argue it is a fortification. It all depends on what it is modelled to look like and what you and your opponent agree to.
True. You could have a battlement or the roof of a bastion that has no walls whatever. So you might agree with your opponent that models placed up there get no cover save at all.
Or you could put walls up there and agree with your opponent that they are fortified walls and as such grant a 3+ cover save instead of the 4+ for walls.
It just that being on top of the bastion does not automatically grant a 3+ cover save. That part is just wrong.
Fair enough.
|
Been out of the game for awhile, trying to find time to get back into it. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 19:23:21
Subject: On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Captain of the Forlorn Hope
|
A bastion and a F. o. R. are both fortifications as per the rules.
the Aegis defense line is a fortifications with special rules making it battlefield debris and only a 4+ cover save.
Any unit obscured by a fortification get a 3+ cover save.
The battlements on the bastion can obscure models. so these models receive a 3+ cover save as they are obscured by a fortification.
|
"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.
I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!
We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 19:46:39
Subject: On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
Long Island, New York, USA
|
DeathReaper wrote: A bastion and a F. o. R. are both fortifications as per the rules.
They are both in the section titled "Fortifications" on pps. 114-117, yes.
DeathReaper wrote:the Aegis defense line is a fortifications with special rules making it battlefield debris and only a 4+ cover save.
No, it's terrain type is "Battlefield Debris (Defence lines)" which is detailed on page 104 (q.v.).
DeathReaper wrote:Any unit obscured by a fortification get a 3+ cover save.
So a unit on top of a shielded Skyshield Landing Pad does not get a 4+ invulnerable save, they only get a regular 3+ cover save?
DeathReaper wrote:The battlements on the bastion can obscure models. so these models receive a 3+ cover save as they are obscured by a fortification.
Units on battlements get their armour saves, because unlike units in a building that cannot be fired at, units on battlements can be fired at.
And again, the rule on page 95 says they can also get a cover save from the battlement walls, not the fortification, from the walls.
Walls as per page 104 give a 4+ cover save unless, as I said above, you and your opponent decide pre-game that the walls are fortified or fortifications, in which case your unit would then get a 3+ cover save.
|
I have found again and again that in encounter actions, the day goes to the side that is the first to plaster its opponent with fire. The man who lies low and awaits developments usually comes off second best. - Erwin Rommel
"For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged, by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions, even on important subjects, which I once thought right but found to be otherwise." - Benjamin Franklin
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 19:49:39
Subject: On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Captain of the Forlorn Hope
|
The battlement is a part of the fortification, thus it grants whatever cover the fortification grants.
The Skyshield landing pad has its own rules stating they get a 4+ invuln.
|
"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.
I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!
We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 19:56:25
Subject: Re:On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
The Skyshield will give both a 3+ cover and a 4+ invuln when the shields are up. The 3+ cover of course assuming that the models in question are being obscured by the Skyshield platform. If not then they don't get it.
Models on battlements get a 3+ cover save too, because Battlements are Fortifications.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 19:58:38
Subject: On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Freaky Flayed One
|
I would also believe it is a 3+ cover save as its all part of the same fortifcation and the rulebook doesnt give any different cover save for the battlement part, naturally make sure you and your opponent agree the cover saves beforehand but it should be a 3+ cover save for a none ruined fortification/battlement and a 4+ for a ruined fortification/battlement as per pg 18 under the cover chart.
|
Somewhere close to 25'000pts
I lost count a few years back. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 20:03:04
Subject: On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
Long Island, New York, USA
|
DeathReaper wrote:The battlement is a part of the fortification, thus it grants whatever cover the fortification grants.
Page 95, look at the battlement section, "Many buildings have flat roofs that can accomodate units - we refer to these as battlements."
So take a wooden outpost (page 92 (q.v.)). It has an AV of 10. It also has a flat roof. That roof is referred to as a battlement.
What cover save do your models on the roof get?
There is no cover classification of wooden outposts on page 18, so I guess they get none. But if they're obscured, they get the cover save of the building (according to you) but the building gives none. See the problem?
The battlement does not give the same cover save as the building, be it a wooden outpost, a bastion, a brick house or a bunker.
Page 95 clearly states that models on the battlement "...have to rely on their armour (and any cover save from the battlement walls) for protection."
Nowhere does it state that models on a battlement get any cover save contingent on the type of building the battlement is on.
Automatically Appended Next Post: Grey Templar wrote:Models on battlements get a 3+ cover save too, because Battlements are Fortifications.
Battlements are not fortifications, they are flat roofs! The distinction is made in the rules and is very important.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/14 20:05:06
I have found again and again that in encounter actions, the day goes to the side that is the first to plaster its opponent with fire. The man who lies low and awaits developments usually comes off second best. - Erwin Rommel
"For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged, by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions, even on important subjects, which I once thought right but found to be otherwise." - Benjamin Franklin
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 20:35:07
Subject: Re:On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Daring Dark Eldar Raider Rider
|
Keep in mind that the battlements CAN provide a 3+ cover save, it is just dependent on what kind of cover is up there. If it is the walls of the fortification extending, then yes, arguably it is a fortification. Or it could be an eldar rooftop with some lovely gardens up there that provide a 6+ cover save. A battlement is just normal terrain that happens to be elevated on top of a building. The cover is entirely dependent on what is up there.
|
Alone in the warp. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/14 20:38:59
Subject: On the roof of a Bastion
|
 |
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
Our gardens are a little bit more sturdier then your silly things. Even our Wraithlords are grown in them.
|
Greebo had spent an irritating two minutes in that box. Technically, a cat locked in a box may be alive or it may be dead. You never know until you look. In fact, the mere act of opening the box will determine the state of the cat, although in this case there were three determinate states the cat could be in: these being Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
Orks always ride in single file to hide their strength and numbers.
Gozer the Gozerian, Gozer the Destructor, Volguus Zildrohar, Gozer the Traveler, and Lord of the Sebouillia |
|
 |
 |
|