Switch Theme:

Should the Dawn of War series be considered canon?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Depraved Slaanesh Chaos Lord




Inside Yvraine

Some of the things you mentioned aren't really "violations" so much as they're improbable.

Most specifically all the things involving the Guard's competence.

Gaunt and his Ghosts have out-badass'd Space Marines, outwitted Inquisitors and single-handily broken the backs of an army billions strong (Necropolis).

Are we to assume that the Gaunt's Ghosts series isn't "canon" based upon those things, or should we just assume that the Tanith First and Only is exceptionally good at what they do?

Anyway, inB4"hurreverythingiscanonnothingiscanonhurr".
Made in us
Depraved Slaanesh Chaos Lord




Inside Yvraine

BlaxicanX wrote:

Anyway, inB4"hurreverythingiscanonnothingiscanonhurr".
Lynata wrote:*bust out ye olde tome o' quotes*

"With Warhammer and Warhammer 40,000, the notion of canon is a fallacy. [...] Warhammer and Warhammer 40,000 exist as tens of thousands of overlapping realities in the imaginations of games developers, writers, readers and gamers. None of those interpretations is wrong."
-- Gav Thorpe

"It all stems from the assumption that there's a binding contract between author and reader to adhere to some nonexistent subjective construct or 'true' representation of the setting. There is no such contract, and no such objective truth."
-- Andy Hoare

"There is no canon. There's a variety of sources, many of which conflict, but every single one is a lens through which we can see the 40K setting."
-- Aaron Dembski-Bowden


Ahhha. :p

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/07/14 07:49:28


 
Made in us
Depraved Slaanesh Chaos Lord




Inside Yvraine

It's a testament to how boring the Sororitas are, that every discussion about them inevitably just turns into a debate about the nature of their miracles, imo.
 
Forum Index » 40K Background
Go to: