Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I've been starting 40k and read the codex for IG. The Master of Ordnance has an attack listed as "Ordnance Barrage 1" but doesn't specify a large or small template. It does refer to scattering of -a- template, but I'm not sure what size.

I've seen posts saying the MoO is effectively a Basilisk, which implies it uses a large template, but I don't see the rule anywhere.

I did a google and there was some talk about a "page 58" indicating that any non-specified ordnance is automatically large template.

It's not page 58 in my codex, and the 6th edition page 58 is just pictures, so I'm assuming this is a line from 5th edition.

I know I'll play this as a large template, but I just want some hard line I can show an opposing player if he decides to question it.

Index in 6th edition points me to page 51 for "ordnance weapons", where it describes them as being huge, powerful, mounted on tanks, etc and says I get to roll two dice to penetrate a vehicle's armor and pick the highest result (hey! I didnt' know that!) but does not mention any large or small templates.

I did read elsewhere that a FAQ was posted saying the MoO fires a round similar to the stats of an Eartshaker, but I haven't been able to find this online.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
I also just checked the pages for "Barrage", and the previously mentioned "is a large blast unless specified' line is not there either.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Did some more research, and a supposed link to a GW article stating the Eartshaker round=MoO round is broken. :(