Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/30 05:38:27
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Road-Raging Blood Angel Biker
|
Okay, so it mentions in C:BA that some blood angels believe that the Sanguinor is the 'coalition of the Primarch's nobler side, the part that kept Sanguinius' dark side in check, and that was lost to the Blood Angels upon his death.'
I read this to mean that part of Sanguinius' soul still survives, probably in the warp. I'd like the idea of Sanguinius being restored to a permemant corporal form and freeing his sons from the black rage and red thirst. It doesn't seem to far fetched that if some part of the primarch lives on that he could be restored to full form.
I would like to see this happen at the same time or near the same time that the other lost primarchs are regrouping. Russ and Corax returning from the warp, khan from the webway, etc. Of coarse, flip side to this should be the traitor primarchs all being marshalled and their legions being gathered back together in a massive Black Crusade that smashes head on with the reinstituted loyal legions (mr smurph primarch will just have to deal with it).
Anyways, I'd want Sanguinius to be brought back for such a confrontation. Complete heresy? Or a viable DIY plot line?
|
The Emperor Protects
_______________________________________
Inquisitorial lesson #298: Why to Hate Choas Gods, cont'd-
With Chaos, Tzeench would probably turn your hands, feet and face into
scrotums, complete with appropriate nerve endings. Then Khorne would
force you and all your friends to fight to the death using your new
scrotal appendages. Once they get tired of that, you get tossed to
Slaanesh who <censored by order of the Inquisition>, until you finally
end up in Nurgle's clutches and he uses you as a loofah. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/30 07:57:44
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
He's dead.
So I'd rather he didn't come back...
|
Enlist as a virtual Ultramarine! Click here for my Chaos Gate (PC) thread.
"It is the great irony of the Legiones Astartes: engineered to kill to achieve a victory of peace that they can then be no part of."
- Roboute Guilliman
"As I recall, your face was tortured. Imagine that - the Master of the Wolves, his ferocity twisted into grief. And yet you still carried out your duty. You always did what was asked of you. So loyal. So tenacious. Truly you were the attack dog of the Emperor. You took no pleasure in what you did. I knew that then, and I know it now. But all things change, my brother. I'm not the same as I was, and you're... well, let us not mention where you are now."
- Magnus the Red, to a statue of Leman Russ
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/30 07:59:44
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
Just Dave wrote:He's dead.
So I'd rather he didn't come back...
This. None of the primarchs should return, least among them the ones that have been confirmed as dead.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/30 08:20:08
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
Moreover, what would it actually achieve? You don't expect to be able actually to field him, I take it?
|
Red Hunters: 2000 points Grey Knights: 2000 points Black Legion: 600 points and counting |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/30 09:43:48
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Mutated Chosen Chaos Marine
|
The return of a loyalist primarch, particularly one that is dead would probably destroy the Imperium. It's unstable already, and the High Lords probably wouldn't appreciate such a threat to the power that has been in their hands for ten thousand years. Even if the primarch said he didn't want to become the new Emperor, it would be too much of a risk to leave him alive and too much of a risk to kill them. The Lords would be split, though considering that they chose to leave the Emperor dead according to the Inquisitor rulebook, it seems likely they'd choose for the primarch to have an unfortunate accident.
|
Arguing with some people is like playing chess with a pigeon. You can play the best chess in the world, but at the end of the day the pigeon will still knock all the pieces off the board and then gak all over it. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/30 15:39:03
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Sneaky Sniper Drone
|
yes Sangunigous is dead.if he comes back he may cause civil war
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/30 17:58:43
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Hurr! Ogryn Bone 'Ead!
Some Throne-Forsaken Battlefield on the other side of the Galaxy
|
Sanguinius wasn't a psyker, so I don't know if he could have become a warp entity.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/07/30 18:01:41
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/30 18:29:55
Subject: Re:Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Mutating Changebringer
|
Keep him dead. Like Bucky, Blink and Gwen Stacy.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/30 18:59:30
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Sneaky Sniper Drone
|
DOOMBREAD wrote:Sanguinius wasn't a psyker, so I don't know if he could have become a warp entity.
he was. remeber that he could see the future
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/30 19:30:54
Subject: Re:Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Homicidal Veteran Blood Angel Assault Marine
Massachusetts
|
Sanguinius was a powerful psyker, he just never bothered to pursue that particular aspect. And it would take quite the unfortunate accident to knock off the guy that single-handedly held the Eternity gate against waves of traitor marines, hordes of daemons, and Ka'Bandha.
As much as I love the character, I think Sanguinius serves the fluff better in death. Just keep it that way.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/07/30 21:23:45
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/30 20:13:23
Subject: Re:Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Kinebrach-Knobbling Xeno Interrogator
|
Idd I agree with the comments saying that he should stay dead, he haves a far better "fluff place" (whatever that means lol) dead.
IF we should get new fluff about the primarchs, it should be about the two that are missing from records. BUUUUUT that won't happen... EVER.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/31 01:55:30
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
Croatia
|
Just Dave wrote:He's dead.
So I'd rather he didn't come back...
Totaly - agree -and loyal primarch's shoud never return....good story thing should stay good
|
ADB: I showed the Wolves revealing the key weakness at the heart of the World Eaters; showing Angron that his Legion was broken and worthless compared to the others; that he was the one primarch who couldn't trust his own warriors, and that they didn't care if he lived or died; showing that loyalty to brothers and sons is the heart of success for the Legiones Astartes, to the point even Lorgar makes a big deal out of saying the World Eaters and their primarch were massively outclassed by Russ, and Angron was too stupid to see the lesson Russ had sacrificed time, sweat, and blood, to teach. We're talking about a battle the Wolves won, by isolating the enemy general through pack tactics, and threatening to kill him, without a hope of defending himself. It was a balance, 50/50 - Angron overpowered Russ, and the Wolves were losing ground to the World Eaters; but Russ and his warriors had Angron by the balls, and barely broke a sweat. They won, no question. Lorgar even says: "The Wolves won, meathead."
Dorn wonāt help you either. Heās too busy being the Emperorās groundskeeper, hiding behind the palace walls. The Wolf is too busy cutting off heads as our fatherās executioner, while the Lion holds on to his secrets, and has no special fondness for you. Who else will come? Not Ferrus, certainly. Nor Corax either. Even as we speak, I suspect he flees for Deliverance. Sanguinius?ā Curze laughed cruelly. āThe angel is more cursed than I. The Khan? He does not wish to be found. So who is left? No one, Vulkan. None of them will come. You are simply not that important. You are alone.ā Konrad Curze to Vulkan
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/31 05:19:13
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Road-Raging Blood Angel Biker
|
Here's the thing: isn't it a staple of western storytelling that when things are at their darkest is when the hero arises/returns and a last hope presents itself?
Anyways, when that time comes, probably never knowing GW, I'd like that last hope to be the return of the primarchs. The lords of terra have run the imperium into the ground. The loyal legions 'taking back' the imperium, if necessary, would still be a general improvement.
Lastly, yes Sanguinius is dead. However, if the sanguinor is really some part of him that continues to exist, then there really is no reason why he couldn't come back. Whether or not he should is matter of opinion, and I think I would be pretty cool.
|
The Emperor Protects
_______________________________________
Inquisitorial lesson #298: Why to Hate Choas Gods, cont'd-
With Chaos, Tzeench would probably turn your hands, feet and face into
scrotums, complete with appropriate nerve endings. Then Khorne would
force you and all your friends to fight to the death using your new
scrotal appendages. Once they get tired of that, you get tossed to
Slaanesh who <censored by order of the Inquisition>, until you finally
end up in Nurgle's clutches and he uses you as a loofah. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/31 07:08:41
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
Phiasco II wrote:Here's the thing: isn't it a staple of western storytelling that when things are at their darkest is when the hero arises/returns and a last hope presents itself?
Anyways, when that time comes, probably never knowing GW, I'd like that last hope to be the return of the primarchs. The lords of terra have run the imperium into the ground. The loyal legions 'taking back' the imperium, if necessary, would still be a general improvement.
Lastly, yes Sanguinius is dead. However, if the sanguinor is really some part of him that continues to exist, then there really is no reason why he couldn't come back. Whether or not he should is matter of opinion, and I think I would be pretty cool.
Except Sanguinius is 100% dead, him coming back would be like Alexander Hamilton returning to save the US in its time of need, or King Edward I to come and save England. Even then Warhammer 40K isn't a story, it is a setting, if the primarchs returns and the Imperium improves the whole setting is changed, it is no longer the grimdark of the 41st Millenium, it is the noblebright of the 42nd Millenium. Also, I hate the idea of portraying the return of the primarchs as good. Look at it like this, you have this God like being return and attempt to claim control of the Imperium. Do you think the High Lords of Terra will just walk away and say "Okay, you the boss."? What happens when the primarch(s) inevitably say(s) that the Emperor wasn't a God. Suddenly their rule has zero justification beyond "I am better than you, so I should be in charge."
Honestly I like the stories of regular humans bringing success and change. Lord Commander Solar Macharius was just a normal human, and in about 20 years he conquered a thousand worlds, a faster rate than probably any of the primarchs. Despite being a regular human, Sebastian Thor was able to return stability to the Imperium and weaken the hold of the ecclesiarchy despite the fact that it weakened his own power. Even if warhammer 40K had an advancing plot, if a primarch returned and was made the new emperor or some crap I would flat out abandon the Imperium. Screw that, my entire Imperial Guard Army goes renegade, intent on watching the Imperium burn.
Besides having a primarch return and the marines take control is the most marine-centric crap ever. Oh hey IG, Imperial Navy, Adeptus Ministorum, Adeptus Mechanicus, Adeptus Terra, and Inquisition, we appreciate all you do, but you are useless so we are putting our guy in control. On a final note Sanguinius is annoying. Oh yeah, he is perfect, he is a blonde haired angel and was the best at everything, Horus thought he should have been warmaster, he managed to put a chink in Horus' armour that allowed the Emperor to kill him, he is the most revered primarch and no one hates him. People think Guilleman is bad? At least Guilleman was flawed enough to have grudges and be hypocritical.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/31 15:28:49
Subject: Re:Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
Croatia
|
Everything you said stands -as for Sanguinius,we will find out if he was perfect as you say in a next book
|
ADB: I showed the Wolves revealing the key weakness at the heart of the World Eaters; showing Angron that his Legion was broken and worthless compared to the others; that he was the one primarch who couldn't trust his own warriors, and that they didn't care if he lived or died; showing that loyalty to brothers and sons is the heart of success for the Legiones Astartes, to the point even Lorgar makes a big deal out of saying the World Eaters and their primarch were massively outclassed by Russ, and Angron was too stupid to see the lesson Russ had sacrificed time, sweat, and blood, to teach. We're talking about a battle the Wolves won, by isolating the enemy general through pack tactics, and threatening to kill him, without a hope of defending himself. It was a balance, 50/50 - Angron overpowered Russ, and the Wolves were losing ground to the World Eaters; but Russ and his warriors had Angron by the balls, and barely broke a sweat. They won, no question. Lorgar even says: "The Wolves won, meathead."
Dorn wonāt help you either. Heās too busy being the Emperorās groundskeeper, hiding behind the palace walls. The Wolf is too busy cutting off heads as our fatherās executioner, while the Lion holds on to his secrets, and has no special fondness for you. Who else will come? Not Ferrus, certainly. Nor Corax either. Even as we speak, I suspect he flees for Deliverance. Sanguinius?ā Curze laughed cruelly. āThe angel is more cursed than I. The Khan? He does not wish to be found. So who is left? No one, Vulkan. None of them will come. You are simply not that important. You are alone.ā Konrad Curze to Vulkan
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/31 15:56:39
Subject: Re:Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
I prefer the other interpertation. The Sanguinor is actually Askellon, the only surviving member of the original Sanguinary Guard that Snaguinious left behind so the order would survive.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 11:17:11
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Trigger-Happy Baal Predator Pilot
|
I like the idea of the sanguinor being half of sanguinius's soul, he was killed, only two characters have died and came back.
(mephiston and thawn) and they'er both op, so a resd primarch, that would ruin the suspense of the blood angels possible impending doom.
Keep him dead!
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/08/08 11:18:03
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 11:33:37
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Sadistic Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
He already came back. Many bad things happened...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 11:35:36
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
I wouldn't mind if some of the lost primarchs reapeared, but not the dead ones. It kind of defeats the point of them being dead.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 11:42:21
Subject: Re:Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Hulking Hunter-class Warmech
|
The Primarchs that are confirmed dead (Sanguinius, Ferrus Manus, Dorn, Horus, Curze etc.) should remain dead.
If they're going to bring back a Primarch, it should at least be one that could feasibly be alive. (Gulliman for example, or Khan, Russ, Vulkan or Corax that simply disappeared.)
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 11:43:58
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Trigger-Happy Baal Predator Pilot
|
How did dorn die again?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 12:05:07
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
Killed offstage by traitor marines after boarding a renegade battleship.
|
Red Hunters: 2000 points Grey Knights: 2000 points Black Legion: 600 points and counting |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 12:16:43
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Trigger-Happy Baal Predator Pilot
|
Huh, pity.
A badass character like dorn would expect a fiery, epic, novel death.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 12:40:53
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Pete Haines
Nottingham
|
phantommaster wrote:He already came back. Many bad things happened...
Many bad things being an understatement.
http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Blood_Angels_(Novel_Series)
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 12:41:52
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Road-Raging Blood Angel Biker
|
phantommaster wrote:He already came back. Many bad things happened...
If your talking about the two Blood Angels novels when a Marine Grows a pair of wings and calls himself the new Bloody Handed (Sanguinius), then thats bollocks, it was that Inquisitor that was a Chaos agent, who mutated him.
If your not, then please do share, im keen to hear what happened
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/08/08 12:43:11
in Inquisitor, a Space Marine can take a krak grenade, pull out the pin, eat the grenade, throw the pin, and the thrown pin will actually kill a normal man, whereas the Space Marine won't even have indigestion. This has actually happened in a game. Hell, a marine can throw his bolt shells and do more damage than by shooting his boltgun |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 12:48:05
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Sadistic Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
redkommando wrote:phantommaster wrote:He already came back. Many bad things happened...
If your talking about the two Blood Angels novels when a Marine Grows a pair of wings and calls himself the new Bloody Handed (Sanguinius), then thats bollocks, it was that Inquisitor that was a Chaos agent, who mutated him.
If your not, then please do share, im keen to hear what happened 
I was talking about that. It wasn't Sanguinius but it shows that very few people would believe him if he really did come back.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 12:52:13
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Road-Raging Blood Angel Biker
|
phantommaster wrote:redkommando wrote:phantommaster wrote:He already came back. Many bad things happened...
If your talking about the two Blood Angels novels when a Marine Grows a pair of wings and calls himself the new Bloody Handed (Sanguinius), then thats bollocks, it was that Inquisitor that was a Chaos agent, who mutated him.
If your not, then please do share, im keen to hear what happened 
I was talking about that. It wasn't Sanguinius but it shows that very few people would believe him if he really did come back.
True, but i'm pretty sure if he did come back, he would come from a standard marine, he would just. . . . appear?? maybe??
|
in Inquisitor, a Space Marine can take a krak grenade, pull out the pin, eat the grenade, throw the pin, and the thrown pin will actually kill a normal man, whereas the Space Marine won't even have indigestion. This has actually happened in a game. Hell, a marine can throw his bolt shells and do more damage than by shooting his boltgun |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 13:18:11
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
redkommando wrote:phantommaster wrote:redkommando wrote:phantommaster wrote:He already came back. Many bad things happened...
If your talking about the two Blood Angels novels when a Marine Grows a pair of wings and calls himself the new Bloody Handed (Sanguinius), then thats bollocks, it was that Inquisitor that was a Chaos agent, who mutated him.
If your not, then please do share, im keen to hear what happened 
I was talking about that. It wasn't Sanguinius but it shows that very few people would believe him if he really did come back.
True, but i'm pretty sure if he did come back, he would come from a standard marine, he would just. . . . appear?? maybe??
Fairly certain there was some story about that. Brother Blood Angels, one starts to morph into Sanguinius and it turns out
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/08/08 13:28:21
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 13:19:34
Subject: Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Spoiler Tags people.
|
Enlist as a virtual Ultramarine! Click here for my Chaos Gate (PC) thread.
"It is the great irony of the Legiones Astartes: engineered to kill to achieve a victory of peace that they can then be no part of."
- Roboute Guilliman
"As I recall, your face was tortured. Imagine that - the Master of the Wolves, his ferocity twisted into grief. And yet you still carried out your duty. You always did what was asked of you. So loyal. So tenacious. Truly you were the attack dog of the Emperor. You took no pleasure in what you did. I knew that then, and I know it now. But all things change, my brother. I'm not the same as I was, and you're... well, let us not mention where you are now."
- Magnus the Red, to a statue of Leman Russ
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 13:19:52
Subject: Re:Return of Sanguinius. Good plot line or pure heresy?
|
 |
Wight Lord with the Sword of Kings
|
Grey Templar wrote:I prefer the other interpertation. The Sanguinor is actually Askellon, the only surviving member of the original Sanguinary Guard that Sanguinious left behind so the order would survive.
You should write it right.
Its something like Azkaellon
|
|
|
 |
 |
|