| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/01 01:22:58
Subject: What is a reasonable amount of points to spend on 'fluff' for a casual game?
|
 |
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
By fluff I mean non-optimized wargear or equipment taken for the sole purpose of mixing it up between units. For example, taking a plasma pistol or single lightening claw on a SM Squad Leader, purity seals even if don't care for them, terminator honors on Squad Leaders without power weapons, banners, switching one missile launcher in a Dev squad to a HB, etc.
Note that this would be used for pickup games, where I would use the same list each time and I don't really expect my opponent to be a great sport. This is aimed at placating cries of cheese and other whining.
Is 10% too much if I am for some synergy, or 5% for totally useless crud?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/01 02:09:06
Subject: Re:What is a reasonable amount of points to spend on 'fluff' for a casual game?
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
Long as its fun..... 100 percent. No one will ever care about your win/loss ratio
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/01 02:50:49
Subject: What is a reasonable amount of points to spend on 'fluff' for a casual game?
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
Is any of that stuff listed even in armies anymore?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/01 02:53:16
Subject: Re:What is a reasonable amount of points to spend on 'fluff' for a casual game?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
sirlotsofpain wrote:Long as its fun..... 100 percent. No one will ever care about your win/loss ratio
This. So long as you obey basic force org restrictions, it doesn't matter what you take. If you have opponent's permission, then you don't even need force org.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/01 03:15:41
Subject: What is a reasonable amount of points to spend on 'fluff' for a casual game?
|
 |
Tzeentch Aspiring Sorcerer Riding a Disc
Battle Barge Impossible Fortress
|
Black Templars have it, right?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/01 03:27:46
Subject: Re:What is a reasonable amount of points to spend on 'fluff' for a casual game?
|
 |
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
Ailaros wrote:This. So long as you obey basic force org restrictions, it doesn't matter what you take. If you have opponent's permission, then you don't even need force org.
As noted in the first post, I'm not expecting the opponent to be a good sport.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/01 03:30:01
Subject: Re:What is a reasonable amount of points to spend on 'fluff' for a casual game?
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
Ailaros wrote:sirlotsofpain wrote:Long as its fun..... 100 percent. No one will ever care about your win/loss ratio
This. So long as you obey basic force org restrictions, it doesn't matter what you take. If you have opponent's permission, then you don't even need force org.
Yep, for my lists I often waste points on storm troopers, vanquishers, and carapace armour. Not exactly bad, but far from the most efficient choices.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|