Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/19 19:50:27
Subject: What do you think influenced the choice of armies for the 2 player starters?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
As much as I love Khador, they seem like an odd choice for the army to go up against Menoth for the Warmachine 2 player boxed set. I would have thought Cygnar would have been a better choice to go up against Menoth. To me Cygnar seems more of the poster child for Warmachine and Menoth a more balanced pairing against them. Cygnar vs. Khador would have probably worked too.
For the Hordes 2 player boxed set, the pairing also doesn't seem right to me. I would have thought that Everblight should be put up against Trollbloods. Or Skorne vs. Everblight. Or Skorne vs. Circle. I don't think Circle vs. Everblight gives you a sense of what's available playstyle wise.
Then again I'm not that experienced with MKII... mechanics or fluff...
What do you think influenced the pairings that they have? At first I thought they were using armies that aren't as popular; that maybe putting them in the starter would help market them better.... but we have like 3 or 4 Menoth players where I'm at plus 4 hours north, where I game sometimes, there's 2 or 3 Menoth players there. Khador also seems to have a good following too from what I've experienced. These players played their armies prior to the 2 player starter. For Hordes it might make a little more sense. I normally see either Skorne or Trollbloods being played alot. Then again maybe its just the areas that I frequent that are influencing my opinion.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/19 21:12:15
Subject: What do you think influenced the choice of armies for the 2 player starters?
|
 |
Soul Token
West Yorkshire, England
|
I think giving a good gameplay matchup was the priority. For the Warmachine box, Kreoss & Sorscha are pretty good mirrors, who have a simple feat, and some depth in the movement tricks or anti-magic tricks they can do. I think the reason Cygnar didn't feature was that they don't have heavy infantry, and for Cryx, the debuff game can maybe be frustrating for rookie players. The Hordes one is a bit more puzzling. Lylith makes sense as the Legion warlock, since she's fairly simple to use with a straightforward feat, but the Circle force is going to be harder to figure out for rookies, and also based around hit & run. We'll see how it works out.
|
"The 75mm gun is firing. The 37mm gun is firing, but is traversed round the wrong way. The Browning is jammed. I am saying "Driver, advance." and the driver, who can't hear me, is reversing. And as I look over the top of the turret and see twelve enemy tanks fifty yards away, someone hands me a cheese sandwich." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/19 21:17:26
Subject: Re:What do you think influenced the choice of armies for the 2 player starters?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
When you factor in the Warcasters and the actual models involved, the Warmachine starter does seem to make sense. I had never thought of that. I was generalizing the factions.
I agree about the Circle possibly being a little tricky to play. I've played them since Mk I and have yet to be successful with them. Then again my lists kind of suck.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/20 00:48:02
Subject: What do you think influenced the choice of armies for the 2 player starters?
|
 |
Longrifle
PEI Canada
|
Isn't Menoth pushing north into Khador land right now fluffwise? that might have something to do with it, Cygnar isnt doing anything except getting beat up on every line  and Cryx are difficult to learn
|
I am the king of Rome and above grammar. Emperor Sigismund |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/20 00:51:04
Subject: Re:What do you think influenced the choice of armies for the 2 player starters?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I'm way behind on my fluff. I didn't realize Menoth were making their way into Khador areas. I've got a lot to catch up on. Cryx are tricky. They're who I'm going to try next.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/20 04:38:16
Subject: What do you think influenced the choice of armies for the 2 player starters?
|
 |
Paingiver
|
The 2 player starters seem to be comprised of a normal or altered battlegroup with no arc nodes, and a plastic, 5 man, medium based, multiwound unit. this virtually set the warmachine factions in stone. The hordes box could've been legion vs. any other faction and I'm not really sure why circle got the push. If I were to guess, the tooling and design for skinwalkers was made for plastic, but they came out in a time PP was having bad trouble with their plastic production.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/20 04:58:35
Subject: What do you think influenced the choice of armies for the 2 player starters?
|
 |
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide
|
Plastic infantry.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/20 09:12:44
Subject: What do you think influenced the choice of armies for the 2 player starters?
|
 |
Nihilistic Necron Lord
|
Plastic Medium Based Infantry. Khador and Menoth have it, Cygnar, Cryx and Retribution don't.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/20 10:36:17
Subject: What do you think influenced the choice of armies for the 2 player starters?
|
 |
Boosting Black Templar Biker
Cincinnati
|
AduroT wrote:
Plastic Medium Based Infantry. Khador and Menoth have it, Cygnar, Cryx and Retribution don't.
Cygnar doesn't have any medium-based infantry, do they? Plastic-wise, they're getting plastic stormblade/stormguard troops later this year from what I had seen on another thread
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/20 14:59:34
Subject: What do you think influenced the choice of armies for the 2 player starters?
|
 |
Wraith
|
Cygnar has no in-faction medium infantry at all. They can get it from Mercs but that's it.
Retribution likewise has the same limitation and I don't think they have access through Mercs but I may be wrong there.
Fluff wise, Circle seems to be doing the most of the Hordes factions to contain and control Legion and it's doings.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/08/20 15:06:24
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/20 18:50:35
Subject: What do you think influenced the choice of armies for the 2 player starters?
|
 |
Ghastly Grave Guard
|
Circle are tricky to use but to be fair 5 PLASTIC skinwalkers. Nuff said
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/23 02:54:17
Subject: What do you think influenced the choice of armies for the 2 player starters?
|
 |
Satyxis Raider
|
Really? for battleboxes I always thought cryx was dead simple. put crippling grasp on the opponents big heavy and then pummel the caster with everything else.
Don't get me wrong, I love my Cryx and maybe it is just because they work with my personal playstyle really well, but I think they are one of the easier forces to use. I have had a much harder time getting results from my Cygnar.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/23 13:19:20
Subject: What do you think influenced the choice of armies for the 2 player starters?
|
 |
Sickening Carrion
|
AduroT wrote:
Plastic Medium Based Infantry. Khador and Menoth have it, Cygnar, Cryx and Retribution don't.
Actually, just to make a point, Cryx does. Two separate units in-fact.
http://battlecollege.wikispaces.com/mkiiBloodgorgers
http://battlecollege.wikispaces.com/mkiiBlackOgrun
Point stands about Cygnar and Ret though.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/23 15:39:39
Subject: What do you think influenced the choice of armies for the 2 player starters?
|
 |
Battlefield Professional
|
Isnt Keross from Khador lands ? or am i confused with Cygnar.. thought it was Khador though.
Also Lylith nearly killed Balduor or however its spelled in the fuff.
http://privateerpressforums.com/showthread.php?46788-Hordes-vs-Hordes-Visual-thread
pics of it
|
-Warmahordes-
Mercenaries
Menoth |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/24 03:29:48
Subject: What do you think influenced the choice of armies for the 2 player starters?
|
 |
Nihilistic Necron Lord
|
Yeah, thought about the Black Ogrun later though, but the Bloodgorgers are the wrong type. I should have qualified my statement with medium based multi-wound infantry. The 3/5 units. Eitherway neither of those two units are plastic.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/08/24 03:30:30
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/24 04:18:25
Subject: What do you think influenced the choice of armies for the 2 player starters?
|
 |
Hangin' with Gork & Mork
|
I almost got the two-player army deal they had at GenCon, but it didn't have Cygnar in it (I didn't really care what the other army would be) so I didn't buy it. I keep thinking about starting up but they keep making me stop. I blame PP, of course, for my clay feet.
|
Amidst the mists and coldest frosts he thrusts his fists against the posts and still insists he sees the ghosts.
|
|
 |
 |
|