Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/08 01:17:07
Subject: Quick BA question
|
 |
Annoyed Blood Angel Devastator
|
Can a furioso librarian take rulebook psychic powers? Also can a furioso librarian fire his weapon and use a psychic shooting attack? Why or why not?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/10/08 01:18:21
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/08 01:21:42
Subject: Quick BA question
|
 |
Captain of the Forlorn Hope
|
The FAQ tells you who can and can not exchange their powers for BRB powers. Check there.
|
"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.
I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!
We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/08 01:56:10
Subject: Quick BA question
|
 |
Annoyed Blood Angel Devastator
|
heres the deal that is causing the confusion,
"A Blood Angels Librarian (including Mephiston) may use the
psychic disciplines found in the Warhammer 40,000 rulebook,
instead of those in Codex: Blood Angels. If he does so, generate
two new powers from the Biomancy, Divination, Telepathy or
Telekinesis disciplines (in any combination) before armies are
deployed"
Codex upgrade =
"Upgrade to a furioso librarian.."
Seems like it should right? I just want some reinforcing
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/08 02:00:37
Subject: Quick BA question
|
 |
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
Furioso Librarian =/= Blood Angles Librarian.
It is the same thing with people who argued that Dark Eldar = Eldar.
|
Greebo had spent an irritating two minutes in that box. Technically, a cat locked in a box may be alive or it may be dead. You never know until you look. In fact, the mere act of opening the box will determine the state of the cat, although in this case there were three determinate states the cat could be in: these being Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
Orks always ride in single file to hide their strength and numbers.
Gozer the Gozerian, Gozer the Destructor, Volguus Zildrohar, Gozer the Traveler, and Lord of the Sebouillia |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/08 02:03:09
Subject: Quick BA question
|
 |
Annoyed Blood Angel Devastator
|
its not?!? How so?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/08 08:28:10
Subject: Quick BA question
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Defined noun - BA Librarian is not the same as Furioso Librarian, same as Heavy Flamer is not the same as a Flamer
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/08 13:06:35
Subject: Quick BA question
|
 |
Annoyed Blood Angel Devastator
|
two can play at that game, a Librarian in the Blood angels codex doesn't call itself a "blood angels librarian" Calls it a librarian. Automatically Appended Next Post: Also isn't it common sense to go off the fact that the statement that "a blood angels librarian can choose from the codex/rulebook for powers yada yada.." To assume all librarians in the blood angels codex to be blood angel librarians, at least until its faqd?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/10/08 13:08:31
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/08 14:17:05
Subject: Quick BA question
|
 |
Blood Angel Terminator with Lightning Claws
|
nosferatu1001 wrote:Defined noun - BA Librarian is not the same as Furioso Librarian, same as Heavy Flamer is not the same as a Flamer
If that is the case the Furioso Librarian's Hoods cancels all Powers on a LD roll off as the Furioso's hood was never changed. Also if you upgrade a Librarian to and Eps then he can no longer take Book powers as he is no longer a BA Librarian.
Another change this implies. The HQ Chaplin (Actually called a Recursuionarys sp) allows any unit he is attached to to reroll hits if they charge. The Errata only changes Chaplains, and not Recursionarys.
|
On Dakka he was Eldanar. In our area, he was Lee. R.I.P., Lee Guthrie. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/09 01:51:00
Subject: Quick BA question
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
The Furiso is a Librarian.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/09 02:33:36
Subject: Quick BA question
|
 |
Raging-on-the-Inside Blood Angel Sergeant
Toronto, Ontario
|
nosferatu1001 wrote:Defined noun - BA Librarian is not the same as Furioso Librarian, same as Heavy Flamer is not the same as a Flamer
Wrong, a heavy flamer is a flamer, just an upgraded version. Same way an epistolary is a librarian just an upgraded version. A furioso librarian is a librarian in dreadnought armour, your argument would lead me to believe a terminator librarian isn't a librarian.
|
10000
4000
7000
Dwarves: 4000 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/09 02:44:26
Subject: Quick BA question
|
 |
[DCM]
Tilter at Windmills
|
I think Nos' comment has some validity, though I would say he misphrased it, and it makes more sense pointing out that a Heavy Flamer is not a Heavy weapon.
That said, in the case of the Furioso, I do suspect that it is meant to be considered a "Blood Angels Librarian". Jbunny brought up some good points.
|
Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More 2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++
A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments
The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.
Maelstrom's Edge! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/09 02:52:10
Subject: Quick BA question
|
 |
Raging-on-the-Inside Blood Angel Sergeant
Toronto, Ontario
|
Mannahnin wrote:I think Nos' comment has some validity, though I would say he misphrased it, and it makes more sense pointing out that a Heavy Flamer is not a Heavy weapon.
That said, in the case of the Furioso, I do suspect that it is meant to be considered a "Blood Angels Librarian". Jbunny brought up some good points.
True a heavy flamer isn't a heavy weapon, but by that phrase it shows you don't set the tone for a unit by the first word.
|
10000
4000
7000
Dwarves: 4000 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/09 03:05:44
Subject: Quick BA question
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
Rythem wrote:True a heavy flamer isn't a heavy weapon, but by that phrase it shows you don't set the tone for a unit by the first word
Nor the last word necessarily, or else a Necron Eldritch Lance would have the Lance special rule.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/09 03:10:54
Subject: Quick BA question
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
Oceanside, CA
|
The entry for Librarian in the Blood Angels book has a special rule called "Psyker". In that special rule, the model is called a Blood Angels Librarian.
The dreadnought also has a special rule called "Psyker", but in the dreadnought listing, it is spelled out as Furioso Librarian.
So, if you look at the two units Psyker rule, the BA book does define them in terms that match the FAQ on who can take new powers. Obviously, the dreadnoughts are so ancient that they were entombed before the new powers came out.
No BRB powers for dreadnoughts. Why would you want them? I'll take the jump pack and shield all day long.
-Matt
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/09 03:35:29
Subject: Quick BA question
|
 |
Raging-on-the-Inside Blood Angel Sergeant
Toronto, Ontario
|
HawaiiMatt wrote:The entry for Librarian in the Blood Angels book has a special rule called "Psyker". In that special rule, the model is called a Blood Angels Librarian.
The dreadnought also has a special rule called "Psyker", but in the dreadnought listing, it is spelled out as Furioso Librarian.
So, if you look at the two units Psyker rule, the BA book does define them in terms that match the FAQ on who can take new powers. Obviously, the dreadnoughts are so ancient that they were entombed before the new powers came out.
No BRB powers for dreadnoughts. Why would you want them? I'll take the jump pack and shield all day long.
-Matt
So by your own words the furioso librarian is a psyker same as a reg librarian according to the BA faq and codex. Saying they are too ancient to know the new powers is just fluff and has no basis here. It doesn't matter if the new powers are good or bad for them, that's not being discussed, what matters is whether they can take them or not.
|
10000
4000
7000
Dwarves: 4000 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/09 03:49:13
Subject: Quick BA question
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
Oceanside, CA
|
Rythem wrote:
So by your own words the furioso librarian is a psyker same as a reg librarian according to the BA faq and codex. Saying they are too ancient to know the new powers is just fluff and has no basis here. It doesn't matter if the new powers are good or bad for them, that's not being discussed, what matters is whether they can take them or not.
The bit about them being too old is meant as humor.
It's not my own words, it's the words printed in the codex.
Page 46 Calls Librarians (the HQ choice) Blood Angel Librarian.
Page 47 Calls Mephesto, Mephesto.
Page 29 Calls the Dreadnought a Furioso Librarian.
All three of these are under a section titled "psyker". That section is telling you that they are a psyker and how many powers they get and can use. They don't have the same rule.
The dreadnought's rule for it's psychic hood just says see page 46.
The FAQ says ignore page 46 and use the rule in the BRB. So, the dreadnought has a current psychic hood, not the old style one.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/09 05:55:15
Subject: Quick BA question
|
 |
Annoyed Blood Angel Devastator
|
Quoting the faq: "A Blood Angels Librarian (including Mephiston) may use the psychic disciplines found in the Warhammer 40,000 rulebook, instead of those in Codex: Blood Angels. If he does so, generate two new powers from the Biomancy, Divination, Telepathy or Telekinesis disciplines (in any combination) before armies are deployed." It just seems blanket as referring to any blood angels librarian, does it not? also : pg. 29 blood angels codex "Some extremely rare Furioso Dreadnaughts are even guided by a crippled and ancient body of a Blood Angels Librarian." (referring to a furioso librarian) That sells it for me. Also some of the powers from the rulebook have existed long before 6th edition. What do you think now?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/10/09 05:56:07
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/09 05:56:53
Subject: Quick BA question
|
 |
Raging-on-the-Inside Blood Angel Sergeant
Toronto, Ontario
|
HawaiiMatt wrote:Rythem wrote:
So by your own words the furioso librarian is a psyker same as a reg librarian according to the BA faq and codex. Saying they are too ancient to know the new powers is just fluff and has no basis here. It doesn't matter if the new powers are good or bad for them, that's not being discussed, what matters is whether they can take them or not.
The bit about them being too old is meant as humor.
It's not my own words, it's the words printed in the codex.
Page 46 Calls Librarians (the HQ choice) Blood Angel Librarian.
Page 47 Calls Mephesto, Mephesto.
Page 29 Calls the Dreadnought a Furioso Librarian.
All three of these are under a section titled "psyker". That section is telling you that they are a psyker and how many powers they get and can use. They don't have the same rule.
The dreadnought's rule for it's psychic hood just says see page 46.
The FAQ says ignore page 46 and use the rule in the BRB. So, the dreadnought has a current psychic hood, not the old style one.
Lol ahh sometimes hard to tell jokes/sarcasm in a forum. I agree that they have the new psychic hood, what I was trying to get at was that the furioso librarian was still a librarian for power selection, whether it be from the old powers or the new ones.
|
10000
4000
7000
Dwarves: 4000 |
|
 |
 |
|