| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2012/11/13 10:47:32
Subject: Drop Pod Assault, doubles
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Right with drop pod assault and playing with a partner what would be the logical rules for drop pod assault, would all the drop pods count towards one drop pod assault list or would you treat them seperate
i,e if the first player has 3 drop pods normally 2 would come in first turn the rest after
and the second play has 1 drop pod, normally would come in first turn.
But overall there is 4 drop pods so would you follow the above or add them together for 4 drop pods so 2 come in first turn and the rest after?
Got a doubles apoc game this weekend and a doubles tourny week after
|
40kGlobal AOA member, regular of Overlords podcast club and 4tk gaming store. Blogger @ http://sanguinesons.blogspot.co.uk/
06/2013: 1st at War of the Roses ETC warm up.
08/213: 3rd place double teams at 4tk
09/2013: 7th place, best daemon and non eldar/tau army at Northern Warlords GT
10/2013: 3rd/4th at Battlefield Birmingham
11/2013: 5th at GT heat 3
11/2013: 5th COG 2k at 4tk
01/2014: 34th at Caledonian
03/2014: 3rd GT Final |
|
|
 |
|
2012/11/13 11:18:06
Subject: Drop Pod Assault, doubles
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Play it as one army, so one total
|
|
|
|
|
2012/11/13 13:40:30
Subject: Re:Drop Pod Assault, doubles
|
|
Bounding Ultramarine Assault Trooper
Montreal, Quebec
|
I play almost exclusivelly this mode with my friends and we play it as 2 armies vs 2 armies. So, everyone play, rules wise, as if alone.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/11/13 13:40:47
* I have to say that NewGW impresses me a lot... |
|
|
|
|
2012/11/13 15:20:08
Subject: Drop Pod Assault, doubles
|
|
Sergeant First Class
|
^ this
|
W40k, FoW, Bolt Action |
|
|
|
|
2012/11/13 16:20:45
Subject: Drop Pod Assault, doubles
|
|
Leader of the Sept
|
Ask the TO
|
Please excuse any spelling errors. I use a tablet frequently and software keyboards are a pain!
 Terranwing - w3;d1;l1
 51st Dunedinw2;d0;l0
 Cadre Coronal Afterglow w1;d0;l0 |
|
|
|
|
2012/11/13 16:22:06
Subject: Drop Pod Assault, doubles
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
For the tourny of course, for the apoc game on sat, there is none. just wondered if there was something in the rules that i have missed
|
40kGlobal AOA member, regular of Overlords podcast club and 4tk gaming store. Blogger @ http://sanguinesons.blogspot.co.uk/
06/2013: 1st at War of the Roses ETC warm up.
08/213: 3rd place double teams at 4tk
09/2013: 7th place, best daemon and non eldar/tau army at Northern Warlords GT
10/2013: 3rd/4th at Battlefield Birmingham
11/2013: 5th at GT heat 3
11/2013: 5th COG 2k at 4tk
01/2014: 34th at Caledonian
03/2014: 3rd GT Final |
|
|
|
|
2012/11/16 01:03:35
Subject: Drop Pod Assault, doubles
|
|
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
MarkyMark wrote:For the tourny of course, for the apoc game on sat, there is none. just wondered if there was something in the rules that i have missed
This is why the Apoc book strongly suggests an organizer; Someone impartial to make rulings, and keep track of things in general.
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
