Switch Theme:

40k Casual Campaign  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




Does anyone know of a campaign ruleset that works well for doing a local event? The issue that we have is consistency, so I'm looking to find a campaign that allows players to drop out or jump in on an "as needed" basis.

Any ideas?
   
Made in ca
Yellin' Yoof




Canada

I'd say... Use one of the imperial armor book campaigns for starting ideas. And consistency issue, hm...

How about this crazy idea: Whatever campaign you use, have each player represent a commander, and add a few NPC commanders as well, perhaps as allies of existing factions. Have the NPCs score victories or defeats with a single roll of a D6 if nobody can be bothered to play their battles.
Then If a new player suddenly jump in, have them pick one such NPC commander (keep the exact race of the army a little vague, possibly they're mercenary sorts, so flexible on morals).
And if a player suddenly has to drop out, their commander becomes 'NPC'.

Insert hijinks about the great blood angel company scoring victory after victory, but the incompetent commander on the west flank keeps frakking up and making a mess of things, argh! Maybe giving the angels a reason to attack their command regiment to execute and replace him. Heh.
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




Interesting idea. Might have something there.

Alternatively, the idea had was a "siege" rule. For example, if a player can't play in a given week, his opponent sieges his territory causing him to lose 50 points on his army list. The next week, if he still can't play, he loses another 100 points (for 150 total). If it goes to a further third week, they automatically lose the territory.

   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut





You could have three different factions that each play can play games for, then have each game win worth a set amount of points. Then the faction with the most points at the end would win and maybe the player that got most of those points could be the final winner.

Example being; Imperium ( Space Marine, IG, etc.), Chaos and then xenos. Depending on what armies people play you could follow the allied chart to see what catagory each army would fall under. Maybe a gaurd player is under Chaos for this campaign.

That would allow players to come a go but still play when they can.

More Dakka!  
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: