| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/04 15:07:34
Subject: Loyalist Traitors
|
 |
Troubled By Non-Compliant Worlds
Eschara
|
From what i've read from the HH series, there were a few people from the traitor legions that were good, but what are the names?
I know:
DG- Garro
EC- Saul Tarvitz
WE- Varren
LW- Loken and Whatshisname 'The Half-Heard'
TS- pretty much their whole legion was loyal
WB- Sol Targon
But did most of them either die, or become the future inquisition?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/01/04 15:31:43
In dedicato imperatum ultra articulo mortis |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/04 15:29:00
Subject: Loyalist Traitors
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
There are a fair amount of them. The principle ones are: Garviel Loken, Tarik Torgaddon, Nathaniel Garro, and Saul Tarvitz. If you want to know more about them, try Lexicanum.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/01/04 15:29:17
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/04 15:33:18
Subject: Loyalist Traitors
|
 |
Troubled By Non-Compliant Worlds
Eschara
|
But then....there were heretics in the loyalist legion- such as the DA on Caliban...
|
In dedicato imperatum ultra articulo mortis |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/04 15:42:11
Subject: Loyalist Traitors
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
That is a special case.
Among the other loyalist legions, if there were traitors in the ranks we don't yet know much about them.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/04 23:37:56
Subject: Loyalist Traitors
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
The first legion is the MOST LOYAL OF ALL LEGIONS, and anyone who says otherwise is a filthy liar!
|
Spehss Mahrens, todeh the enemeh is at oua doar. We know oua duteh and we will do eet. We fight for our honor as Blod Rehvens, as SPESS MAHRENS, and we fight in the nehme of the Emprah! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/05 00:02:24
Subject: Loyalist Traitors
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
Why would you even say that?
*wipes mind*
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/07 16:38:40
Subject: Loyalist Traitors
|
 |
Lesser Daemon of Chaos
|
Alpharius.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/07 17:33:38
Subject: Loyalist Traitors
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I'm not sure what kind of kool-aid you're drinking if you think that's accurate.
The Thousand Sons, all of them, were cavorting with daemons for centuries before the Heresy. You really can't be much more a traitor than that.
|
"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."
This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.
Freelance Ontologist
When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/07 17:56:59
Subject: Loyalist Traitors
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
Manchu wrote:
Among the other loyalist legions, if there were traitors in the ranks we don't yet know much about them.
Right.
We only get rare examples like the White Scars in Garro:Sword of Truth.
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/07 19:35:38
Subject: Loyalist Traitors
|
 |
Junior Officer with Laspistol
Perth/Glasgow
|
DarknessEternal wrote:
I'm not sure what kind of kool-aid you're drinking if you think that's accurate.
The Thousand Sons, all of them, were cavorting with daemons for centuries before the Heresy. You really can't be much more a traitor than that.
not knowingly, in that they though what they were doing was for the greater good and saw them as "primordial predators" in the warp, not actual daemons,
They were forced onto the path of the traitor by Horus and Leman Russ,
Word Bearers on the other hand actually created possessed marines
|
Currently debating whether to study for my exams or paint some Deathwing |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/07 20:08:13
Subject: Loyalist Traitors
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote: DarknessEternal wrote:
I'm not sure what kind of kool-aid you're drinking if you think that's accurate.
The Thousand Sons, all of them, were cavorting with daemons for centuries before the Heresy. You really can't be much more a traitor than that.
not knowingly,
It's pretty irrelevant whether you're subservient to daemons because you knew what they were, or that they lied to you. Either way, you're damned.
|
"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."
This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.
Freelance Ontologist
When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|