Switch Theme:

Non Base Touching Template Weapons Should Require Scatter Dice  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




Title says it all. Once you are "shooting" a template weapon out away from your model it should have the posibility of scatter IMO.

Discuss
   
Made in us
Librarian with Freaky Familiar






..u mean like ML will scatter? because that already does scatter

To many unpainted models to count. 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




No like the Baleflamer or the Dreadknight Flamer.
   
Made in us
Librarian with Freaky Familiar






why would a dreadknight flamer scatter? its not like when you spray a garden hose it turns right back around and smacks you in the face?

To many unpainted models to count. 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




 Backspacehacker wrote:
why would a dreadknight flamer scatter? its not like when you spray a garden hose it turns right back around and smacks you in the face?


First off that comparison is aweful considering that yes sometimes that does happen(windy day, leaky nozzle) hehe.

Second, the comparison could be said for all weapons.

Third, template weapons were designed to be from the base out, the logic being that no one could miss the target 7" in front of them with a flame thrower.

Any weapon that shoots away from the model should have a chance of missing.
   
Made in us
Hardened Veteran Guardsman




Pueblo, Colorado

Considering all template weapons shoot away from the model...your idea is that all template weapons should scatter, even flamers?
   
Made in us
Librarian with Freaky Familiar






Flame throwers dont really miss, they are the simplest form of point and shoot, hell its a wall of flame.

Besides how would you scatter it? If you use the current scatter mechanic you have a chance of the flame thrower doing what i said an blowing back at you and hitting models behind you which again makes no sense. or it has a chance to scatter forward, how the hell does that work, the flamer just magically shoots 7 feet then catches fire?

Flamers as they are work fine and have no need to be scattered, because it would not make sense. The only thing that would effect the direction of a flame would be wind which would be another whole mechanic to the game.

To many unpainted models to count. 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




You seem to be missing the point.

In 40k blast and large blast weapons scatter to simulate the firer missing their target. The template weapons were for weapons that had no chance of missing since the distance was so close. Now they are making template weapons that have distance, requireing that they should be aimed, which should make them less acurate IMO.

To the other question, how would you do it. Simple.

1. Place template

2. roll scatter and adjust the small end of the template according to the roll

3. repossition template's larger end however the firer seems fit while leaving the short end alone.

Would still be more random even though you could completely turn the template around, but this is no different than how I have seen the Baleflamer being used.

I do not mean to pick on the Baleflamer but this doesn't effect alot of weapons YET. I just see that a trend might be on it's way. Look out for that new missile launcher with the napalm(sp?) missile that uses the template instead of the blast marker(which is what I think should be used instead of the template anyways).

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/01/17 19:22:39


 
   
Made in us
1st Lieutenant




Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Again, template weapons like that (USUALLY flamethrowers of some kind) don't really miss. If you have ever seen someone shoot a flamethrower in real life, and I have (my friend collects exotic weapons), it's near impossible to miss. Even on an incredibly windy day or in the worse circumstances, the force that it's pushing the gel out (it's not shooting fire, it's shooting flaming gel) is hard to manipulate. Now, the "flame" WILL move against the wind, but it's not significant enough to cause you to miss your target

Now, if it was like a flame thrower ML (like, it shoots a missile and the missile breaks apart to shoot fire just next to it's target), I would like this rule.

Maybe im just not seeing enough weapons that could reasonably use this rule...

DS:90S++G++M--B++I++Pww211++D++A+++/areWD-R+++T(T)DM+

Miniature Projects:
6mm/15mm Cold War

15/20mm World War 2 (using Flames of War or Battlegroup Overlord/Kursk)

6mm Napoleonic's (Prussia, Russia, France, Britain) 
   
Made in us
Plummeting Black Templar Thunderhawk Pilot





Equestria/USA

I always viewed torrent weapons like massive flame throwers. I see it like a garden hose flamer vs a firemans hose hooked up to a pump truck. Same water with a lot more power and distance. I don't believe they should scatter at all

Black Templars 4000 Deathwatch 6000
 
   
Made in us
Librarian with Freaky Familiar






again if you do that then you run into the problem of this.

the dice could scatter away from the model shooting the flame, so i ask how can you shoot a flamer then not have the fuel ignite until it is 10 yards away from the flame source.


on the next problem, with how you said i can adjust the temple, it would be broken

lets say it looks something like this

+++++++
^
x
O
+ are the enamys in a line
x is the small end of the flame template
^ is the direction to the large end of the template
and O is the model shooting the flame

you roll to scatter, and it ends up like this

i can then position my template to hit all the models and the flamer is basically making a right turn in mid air.


X>+++++++

O

on the next problem, with how you said i can adjust the temple, it would be broken

it makes sense that ML need to be aimed but you dont need to aim a flamer its your standard point and click interface.

side question what army do you run?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/01/17 21:46:45


To many unpainted models to count. 
   
Made in us
The Conquerer






Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios

A torrent weapon represents a bigger flamethrower. Its not something that misses. If the target is in range its getting doused.

Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines

Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.

MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! 
   
Made in ca
Grisly Ghost Ark Driver





Yup, it's just a larger flamethrower and therefore pushes the flames further, it's not 'aiming' anything any more or less than template weapons are.

Personally i'd have gone with the apocalypse tear-drop template for larger ones instead of just giving them more range, but that is what they went with instead.

Edit: The 'Hellstorm' one. Also I don't think there is a good reason to make them scatter.

This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2013/01/18 02:20:39


 
   
Made in us
Thrall Wizard of Tzeentch






Well, imagine the baleflamer shooting the 16" flamestorm template. Instead of hitting 3-4 models, it's more like 10.

I, for one, don't mind GW making me buy more stuff to carry around.
   
Made in us
Librarian with Freaky Familiar






I fell like OP is just a butt hurt, horde army player who got wrecked by some one who was rocken a lot of flamers.

/thread

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/01/18 03:22:38


To many unpainted models to count. 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: