Switch Theme:

Contemptor Questions  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in eu
Executing Exarch






1) If stationary, can they still fire at ground targets even though they have the skyfire rule? I think they can, but I'd like a second opinion.

2)On a mortis, the interceptor rule states ' within range and line of sight'. What is the dreadnoughts firing arc - 360 or front. For normal shooting it's 360 degree's, but I remember the chaos dread having a 45degree arc for shooting your own side purposes.

Thanks

Edit:these were both points that came up in a battle - just couldn't find the right rule at the right time :/

This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2013/02/04 12:05:50


 Blacksails wrote:

Its because ordinance is still a word.
However, firing ordinance at someone isn't nearly as threatening as firing ordnance at someone.
Ordinance is a local law, or bill, or other form of legislation.
Ordnance is high caliber explosives.
No 'I' in ordnance.
Don't drown the enemy in legislation, drown them in explosives.
 
   
Made in dk
Servoarm Flailing Magos






Metalica

Normal dreads don't have a 360 shooting arc. They can pivot without counting as moving in the movement phase, but shoot like a vehicle in the shooting phase.

 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




1) Yes, because you have interceptor as well
2) hull mounted is 45 degrees total horizontal, 45 degrees total vertical
   
Made in eu
Executing Exarch






Thanks

 Blacksails wrote:

Its because ordinance is still a word.
However, firing ordinance at someone isn't nearly as threatening as firing ordnance at someone.
Ordinance is a local law, or bill, or other form of legislation.
Ordnance is high caliber explosives.
No 'I' in ordnance.
Don't drown the enemy in legislation, drown them in explosives.
 
   
Made in gb
Executing Exarch






 Purifier wrote:
Normal dreads don't have a 360 shooting arc. They can pivot without counting as moving in the movement phase, but shoot like a vehicle in the shooting phase.

Not quite correct, Walkers pivot as part of the Shooting phase (unless they are Immobilized), Page 84, bottom left.
   
Made in gb
Executing Exarch






So does that mean it can shoot anything it wants in its own shooting phase, but you can't shoot any thing behind the dread with intercepter in your opponents movement phase?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/02/04 16:35:54


 Blacksails wrote:

Its because ordinance is still a word.
However, firing ordinance at someone isn't nearly as threatening as firing ordnance at someone.
Ordinance is a local law, or bill, or other form of legislation.
Ordnance is high caliber explosives.
No 'I' in ordnance.
Don't drown the enemy in legislation, drown them in explosives.
 
   
Made in be
Khorne Chosen Marine Riding a Juggernaut





Belgium

Yup.

But the cases where you have a ennemy flyer in the back of your dread doesn't come that often, or at least not before turn 3 or 4.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/02/05 01:58:49


   
Made in eu
Executing Exarch






 Slayer le boucher wrote:
Yup.

But the cases where you have a enemy flyer in the back of your dread doesn't come that often, or at least not before turn 3 or 4.


Or you could turn up turn two and deepstike behind them wherever they are.
Or just deepstrike out of range and kill them.

I'm not impressed by contemptors with interceptor - it sounds good, but quickly becomes just another hoop to jump through.

Short of putting 2 down,as far forwards as possible, back to back, I can't see the point of the out of turn shooting interceptor part.

 Blacksails wrote:

Its because ordinance is still a word.
However, firing ordinance at someone isn't nearly as threatening as firing ordnance at someone.
Ordinance is a local law, or bill, or other form of legislation.
Ordnance is high caliber explosives.
No 'I' in ordnance.
Don't drown the enemy in legislation, drown them in explosives.
 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





PredaKhaine wrote:
I can't see the point of the out of turn shooting interceptor part.

You can't see the point in killing something as it arrives from Reserves before it gets to shoot?

"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."

This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.


Freelance Ontologist

When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. 
   
Made in eu
Executing Exarch






Not if every man and his dog get to deep strike behind it and shoot the dreadnought in the back.

So for example - a friend has a contemptor with assault cannons + skyfire + interceptor

With fliers, I either fly on from reserve and stay 24"+ away, or if I need to, deep strike behind him and open fire.
The Dreadnought never actually gets to fire using interceptor. It justs becomes a hoop to leap through before it goes down.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/02/06 08:15:31


 Blacksails wrote:

Its because ordinance is still a word.
However, firing ordinance at someone isn't nearly as threatening as firing ordnance at someone.
Ordinance is a local law, or bill, or other form of legislation.
Ordnance is high caliber explosives.
No 'I' in ordnance.
Don't drown the enemy in legislation, drown them in explosives.
 
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut





Interceptor units are best used in a staggered formantion imo, so one is covering the other one. How many flyers can deepstrike now?, you will still mishap if your base is over another unit or go off the table and if you are moving so you are outside of his range then depending what flyer you are using, he is creating a denial area, one of the main points of using interceptor

40kGlobal AOA member, regular of Overlords podcast club and 4tk gaming store. Blogger @ http://sanguinesons.blogspot.co.uk/
06/2013: 1st at War of the Roses ETC warm up.
08/213: 3rd place double teams at 4tk
09/2013: 7th place, best daemon and non eldar/tau army at Northern Warlords GT
10/2013: 3rd/4th at Battlefield Birmingham
11/2013: 5th at GT heat 3
11/2013: 5th COG 2k at 4tk
01/2014: 34th at Caledonian
03/2014: 3rd GT Final 
   
Made in eu
Executing Exarch






I agree on the formation point - my choice would be two back to back

Off the top of my head for deep striking fliers that I regularly see
Storm Raven
Night wing
Phoenix

But with a 24" denial area - all those fliers have 24"+ plus guns, so they would be able to shoot anything the dreadnought can cover. And as the contemptor has skyfire, he'd be one of the first targets anyway.
I agree with you for longer range weapons, but the assualt cannons just seem a bit too short range to be a good interceptor weapon.

Can the aegis defence line pivot 360 to intercept, or is that los only too?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/02/06 09:07:23


 Blacksails wrote:

Its because ordinance is still a word.
However, firing ordinance at someone isn't nearly as threatening as firing ordnance at someone.
Ordinance is a local law, or bill, or other form of legislation.
Ordnance is high caliber explosives.
No 'I' in ordnance.
Don't drown the enemy in legislation, drown them in explosives.
 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




An Aegis gun is fired by the model in base with it; you do not trace LOS from the barrels.
   
Made in eu
Executing Exarch






Thanks again

 Blacksails wrote:

Its because ordinance is still a word.
However, firing ordinance at someone isn't nearly as threatening as firing ordnance at someone.
Ordinance is a local law, or bill, or other form of legislation.
Ordnance is high caliber explosives.
No 'I' in ordnance.
Don't drown the enemy in legislation, drown them in explosives.
 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





PredaKhaine wrote:

So for example - a friend has a contemptor with assault cannons + skyfire + interceptor

With fliers, I either fly on from reserve and stay 24"+ away, or if I need to, deep strike behind him and open fire.

What about the Comtempor Mortis with twin-linked Lascannons and Cyclone with his back to the edge of the table?

Saying something is bad because someone is using it in the worst way possible doesn't actually make it bad.

"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."

This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.


Freelance Ontologist

When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. 
   
Made in eu
Executing Exarch






PredaKhaine wrote:
I agree on the formation point - my choice would be two back to back

I agree with you for longer range weapons, but the assualt cannons just seem a bit too short range to be a good interceptor weapon.


I was specifically talking about the assualt cannon variant.




Automatically Appended Next Post:
 DarknessEternal wrote:
PredaKhaine wrote:

So for example - a friend has a contemptor with assault cannons + skyfire + interceptor

With fliers, I either fly on from reserve and stay 24"+ away, or if I need to, deep strike behind him and open fire.

What about the Comtempor Mortis with twin-linked Lascannons and Cyclone with his back to the edge of the table?

Saying something is bad because someone is using it in the worst way possible doesn't actually make it bad.


I see the aegis as better as the aegis with a lascannon has a threat of 96"

Lascannons with 48" work well for area denial, but with it's back to the board edge, that means it has to sit still for 2-3 turns in order to avoid fliers deep striking behind it. In the meantime if fliers arrive from reserve or by deep strike, they'll just come on out of 48" range. Fliers like the storm raven (soon to be rolled out for all marines if the rumours are true) get missiles with a 72" range, so marines could still shoot anywhere, with no area denail, with no response.

"Saying something is bad because someone is using it in the worst way possible doesn't actually make it bad."

I didn't say it was bad - I said I'm not sold on it. As in its a nice unit but I wouldn't buy one.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/02/07 10:22:05


 Blacksails wrote:

Its because ordinance is still a word.
However, firing ordinance at someone isn't nearly as threatening as firing ordnance at someone.
Ordinance is a local law, or bill, or other form of legislation.
Ordnance is high caliber explosives.
No 'I' in ordnance.
Don't drown the enemy in legislation, drown them in explosives.
 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




Terrain also works nicely for denying rear shots. Sticking it up against a ruin works wonders
   
Made in eu
Executing Exarch






That'd work too I suppose

Thanks

 Blacksails wrote:

Its because ordinance is still a word.
However, firing ordinance at someone isn't nearly as threatening as firing ordnance at someone.
Ordinance is a local law, or bill, or other form of legislation.
Ordnance is high caliber explosives.
No 'I' in ordnance.
Don't drown the enemy in legislation, drown them in explosives.
 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: