Switch Theme:

What late war book should I be using to build my forces?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Tail-spinning Tomb Blade Pilot






So I will be playing Germans and I was wondering what book I should be using to create my forces from. I will be fighting Britains finest.

I have:

7 Tiger 1e

7 sd kfz 251 half tracks, the troop carrier with mg on it

1 sd kfz i think it is a 7/1, the anti air kind

1 grenadier platoon box set(thats where most of the sd kfz half tracks are from)

two sets of germans from the new open fire box set. (6 stug, the grenadiers, the pak 40s, etc)

one set of AA bunkers, mostly purchased to use as buildings

Any ideas?

Dave

Victory is not the most important outcome. Enjoyment and excitement is the best outcome, victory is sweeter when it was fun.
 
   
Made in gb
1st Lieutenant







Difficult - but then I dislike Tigers!

there is a whole tiger list in the new bridge by bridge book (but they're rubbish tigers!)

Schwere Panzerkompanie from Grey wolf should be good!

As a brief think you Could do... (get onto easy army!! small cost for all the lists!)

HQ Tiger
3 Tigers (1 upgraded to Carius)
2 Tigers
3 Panzer Grens in armoured half tracks with a Faust
3 Sd Kfz 7/1 (Quad 2cm) AAA

1750 on the nose

My FOW Blog
http://breakthroughassault.blogspot.co.uk/

My Eldar project log (26/7/13)
http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?p=5518969#post5518969

Exiles forum
http://exilesbbleague.phpbb4ever.com/index.php 
   
Made in us
Tail-spinning Tomb Blade Pilot






I would still like to use the stug's I have from the Open Fire set. Is there a book I could use to get sort of a Tiger and Stug force?

I think a Stug assault backed up by tigers would be a cool theme. Don't be worried points wise, I personally like to use lots of stuff!

Dave

Victory is not the most important outcome. Enjoyment and excitement is the best outcome, victory is sweeter when it was fun.
 
   
Made in gb
1st Lieutenant







Best you can do then is either the panzer kompanie or the Stug Assault list from Grey Wolf - but you'll probably get a max of 4 Tigers.


My FOW Blog
http://breakthroughassault.blogspot.co.uk/

My Eldar project log (26/7/13)
http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?p=5518969#post5518969

Exiles forum
http://exilesbbleague.phpbb4ever.com/index.php 
   
Made in us
Tail-spinning Tomb Blade Pilot






What about the Earth and Steel book?

Victory is not the most important outcome. Enjoyment and excitement is the best outcome, victory is sweeter when it was fun.
 
   
Made in ca
Ancient Space Wolves Venerable Dreadnought




Victoria B.C.

Meh I would stick with grey wolf. With having that many tigers what do you want stugs for you can just blast what ever you want with 6 tigers and possibly some sweet tiger aces.

I was playing with a similar idea for tigers and some inf.

Overview of the WoC army book.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/388667.page#3171854
Ralin Givens is the chaos to my warriors. Ra Ra Ra go team awesome I mean chaos
Tzack Vahr Zhen's unholy followers.
all hail Howie Mandel deal or no deal it dosnt matter tzeentch wins
Khorne flakes part of a good breakfast when you plan to kill maim and burn all!!!

Do you have enough Priests do you?
 
   
Made in gb
1st Lieutenant







The other option to consider is that with what you have you basically can do 3 lists (with minimal other investment)

Tigers with infantry back up
StuG's with infantry back up
Grenadiers with tank back up

Add in some artillery and mortars and you're in a great position

( and a few more half tracks you can do an armoured gren list!)

My FOW Blog
http://breakthroughassault.blogspot.co.uk/

My Eldar project log (26/7/13)
http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?p=5518969#post5518969

Exiles forum
http://exilesbbleague.phpbb4ever.com/index.php 
   
Made in us
Tail-spinning Tomb Blade Pilot






Rough draft for some first lists out of Grey Wolf book:

1st list is a Grenadier Kompanie-

Company HQ w/SMG

grenadiers 3x teams plus hq

grenadiers 3 teams plus hq

grenadiers 3 teams plus hq

1x anti tank PaK 40 platoon(3 pak 40)

1x anti air platoon (3x 2cm flak guns)

Schwere Panzer platoon(4x tiger e1)

StuG platoon(3x StuG G)

1885 points.

List 2 Panzer Kompanie-

HQ 2 Stug G

Stug G x3

Stug G x3

Schwere panzer platoon 4x tiger 1e

gepanzerte grenadier platoon with hq and 3 teams

anti air platoon 2x sd kfz 7/1

1960 pts

Any thoughts on this?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/02/19 21:58:14


Victory is not the most important outcome. Enjoyment and excitement is the best outcome, victory is sweeter when it was fun.
 
   
Made in gb
1st Lieutenant







Just as a word of warning don't start at high point values, learning the rules is easier at lower values!

Also tanks are easier to learn than infantry!

Few less tigers in list 2 and you have a half decent list

My FOW Blog
http://breakthroughassault.blogspot.co.uk/

My Eldar project log (26/7/13)
http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?p=5518969#post5518969

Exiles forum
http://exilesbbleague.phpbb4ever.com/index.php 
   
Made in us
Tail-spinning Tomb Blade Pilot






 Reaver83 wrote:
Just as a word of warning don't start at high point values, learning the rules is easier at lower values!

Also tanks are easier to learn than infantry!

Few less tigers in list 2 and you have a half decent list


I hear you points values wise, but I always look to the future! I also like to go big or go home lol.

So we think list 1 is not so good?

Victory is not the most important outcome. Enjoyment and excitement is the best outcome, victory is sweeter when it was fun.
 
   
Made in gb
Bounding Assault Marine





Cheshire, UK

First list is good but I would knock the tigers down to 2 and use the points to get 4 panzer 4's and add panzerfausts to the infantry and HQ. That way you get 8 platoons and deploy 4 on reserve missions when defending. You'd probably deploy 2 grenadier platoons, the AA and pak 40's and have the rest to counter-attack.

   
Made in gb
Bounding Assault Marine





Cheshire, UK

Obviously I was stoned when I wrote that last reply, as you cannot take tigers and panzers AND stugs... use the points to grab some mortars and mg42's and attach the mg's out to the grenadier platoons.

   
Made in gb
Oberstleutnant





Back in the English morass

Don't take understrength infantry platoons, always take them full stregnth or don't take them at all.

RegalPhantom wrote:
If your fluff doesn't fit, change your fluff until it does
The prefect example of someone missing the point.
Do not underestimate the Squats. They survived for millenia cut off from the Imperium and assailed on all sides. Their determination and resilience is an example to us all.
-Leman Russ, Meditations on Imperial Command book XVI (AKA the RT era White Dwarf Commpendium).
Its just a shame that they couldn't fight off Andy Chambers.
Warzone Plog 
   
Made in gb
Bounding Assault Marine





Cheshire, UK

As it's not possible to bring platoons with just 3 teams, I think he means squads.

   
Made in de
Hoary Long Fang with Lascannon






Palindrome wrote:
Don't take understrength infantry platoons, always take them full stregnth or don't take them at all.


Really? Why is that? I sometimes take them to squeeze an additional platoon out of the points. They are still able to hold objectives if dug-in. Friend of mine runs a russian Strelkovy with a full strength "platoon" and a min strength "platoon". He uses the big platoon to go kick ass and hold home objectives with the other and hes doing fine. But also i dont run or have played against much heavy tanks so far so this impression could be wrong.

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2013/02/20 15:42:02


 
   
Made in gb
Oberstleutnant





Back in the English morass

Mywik wrote:
Palindrome wrote:
Don't take understrength infantry platoons, always take them full stregnth or don't take them at all.


Really? Why is that? I sometimes take them to squeeze an additional platoon out of the points. They are still able to hold objectives if dug-in. Friend of mine runs a russian Strelkovy with a full strength "platoon" and a min strength "platoon". He uses the big platoon to go kick ass and hold home objectives with the other and hes doing fine. But also i dont run or have played against much heavy tanks so far so this impression could be wrong.


Strelkovy are an exception due to their sheer size. For smaller platoons (Germans etc) an understrength platoon is too easy to break and they don't have the survivability or firepower even to hold an objective. If I can I make my infantry platoons 10 stands strong.

RegalPhantom wrote:
If your fluff doesn't fit, change your fluff until it does
The prefect example of someone missing the point.
Do not underestimate the Squats. They survived for millenia cut off from the Imperium and assailed on all sides. Their determination and resilience is an example to us all.
-Leman Russ, Meditations on Imperial Command book XVI (AKA the RT era White Dwarf Commpendium).
Its just a shame that they couldn't fight off Andy Chambers.
Warzone Plog 
   
Made in gb
1st Lieutenant







I think that if you run a 2 section German platoon (5 stands) it doesn't take much to break you

My FOW Blog
http://breakthroughassault.blogspot.co.uk/

My Eldar project log (26/7/13)
http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?p=5518969#post5518969

Exiles forum
http://exilesbbleague.phpbb4ever.com/index.php 
   
Made in us
1st Lieutenant




Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Mywik wrote:
Palindrome wrote:
Don't take understrength infantry platoons, always take them full stregnth or don't take them at all.


Really? Why is that? I sometimes take them to squeeze an additional platoon out of the points. They are still able to hold objectives if dug-in. Friend of mine runs a russian Strelkovy with a full strength "platoon" and a min strength "platoon". He uses the big platoon to go kick ass and hold home objectives with the other and hes doing fine. But also i dont run or have played against much heavy tanks so far so this impression could be wrong.


Min Strength Strelkovy is still bigger than your max strength platoons. They don't work on the same level of organization.

As a Brit, Russian, and bit of German player I can say that running a 2 section German Platoon is one of the easiest things for me to crack open. All I have to do is shoot a gun or two at it, make it take a morale check, and it might run. It might not seem like a lot, but adding another 2 stands makes quite a difference.

DS:90S++G++M--B++I++Pww211++D++A+++/areWD-R+++T(T)DM+

Miniature Projects:
6mm/15mm Cold War

15/20mm World War 2 (using Flames of War or Battlegroup Overlord/Kursk)

6mm Napoleonic's (Prussia, Russia, France, Britain) 
   
 
Forum Index » Historical Miniature Games: WW1 to Modern
Go to: