Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/27 06:02:38
Subject: Difference between "MKII Crusade Armour" and "Legion MKII..."
|
 |
Enigmatic Sorcerer of Chaos
|
This has been bothering me for a little while and after finally trying to compare the two images of the different selections and not being able to decipher any differences, I turn to you guys. I'm figuring this has something to do with the fact that I don't play and therefor know very little about 40k, and I'm just not noticing something as a result.
But what exactly is the difference between these two classifications on the Forgeworld site?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/27 06:05:04
Subject: Difference between "MKII Crusade Armour" and "Legion MKII..."
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
The helmets, one has a nose bridge the other has a straight slit eye visor. That's pretty much the only difference. I believe they say something about upgraded power supplies a more armored helmet and some other such things.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/27 06:09:15
Subject: Difference between "MKII Crusade Armour" and "Legion MKII..."
|
 |
Enigmatic Sorcerer of Chaos
|
Don't they both have straight slit eye visors? These pictures probably show it better. Edit: Perhaps it's just the legs? There are a couple in running position that are standing on the opposite leg as compared to the non-legion ones. I only even noticed that after realizing the url had "legarm" in it
|
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2013/05/27 06:12:10
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/27 06:29:05
Subject: Difference between "MKII Crusade Armour" and "Legion MKII..."
|
 |
Secretive Dark Angels Veteran
UK - Warwickshire
|
Its the icon/lack of icon on the belt methinks.
|
'Ain't nothing crazy about me but my brain. Right brain? Riight! No not you right brain! Right left brain? Right!... Okay then lets do this!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/27 11:24:08
Subject: Difference between "MKII Crusade Armour" and "Legion MKII..."
|
 |
Slaanesh Chosen Marine Riding a Fiend
|
I looked at both entries on the forgeworld site and can't see a real difference. Maybe it's just something because of the horus heresy line of them.
the mkII armor models existed before forgeworld started the horus heresy line and maybe they added those as legion set just to make sure that they also can be used for that but kept the old entry for the non-heresy stuff.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/27 11:38:38
Subject: Difference between "MKII Crusade Armour" and "Legion MKII..."
|
 |
Secret Inquisitorial Eldar Xenexecutor
|
Different poses is the only real difference i can see. The kits work well in a mixed unit together
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/27 13:41:37
Subject: Difference between "MKII Crusade Armour" and "Legion MKII..."
|
 |
Secretive Dark Angels Veteran
UK - Warwickshire
|
btldoomhammer wrote:I looked at both entries on the forgeworld site and can't see a real difference. Maybe it's just something because of the horus heresy line of them.
the mkII armor models existed before forgeworld started the horus heresy line and maybe they added those as legion set just to make sure that they also can be used for that but kept the old entry for the non-heresy stuff.
As i said previously, its the belt buckle area, 'Space Marine' mk II has an aquilla embossed onto the figure, while the legion mk II does not, it has a smooth plate instead, presumably so it suits being Chaos or Imperials, Mk3 iron armour and legion mk3 have a similar difference with emblems on the chest plates.
|
'Ain't nothing crazy about me but my brain. Right brain? Riight! No not you right brain! Right left brain? Right!... Okay then lets do this!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/27 14:31:47
Subject: Difference between "MKII Crusade Armour" and "Legion MKII..."
|
 |
Slaanesh Chosen Marine Riding a Fiend
|
HairySticks wrote:
As i said previously, its the belt buckle area, 'Space Marine' mk II has an aquilla embossed onto the figure, while the legion mk II does not, it has a smooth plate instead, presumably so it suits being Chaos or Imperials, Mk3 iron armour and legion mk3 have a similar difference with emblems on the chest plates.
We are talking about these two sets right?
http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/Warhammer-40000/Space_Marines/Space_Marine-Infantry-and-Accessories/LEGION_MKII_CRUSADE_ARMOUR.html
http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/Warhammer-40000/Space_Marines/Space_Marine-Infantry-and-Accessories/MK-II-CRUSADE-ARMOUR.html
Because i either need my eyes checked or they both have aquilla belt buckles.  Have you seen them personally? Because pictures on both sets i linked have the belt buckle. Have i looked at the wrong items or is there a wrong picture on the forgeworld site?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/27 14:50:36
Subject: Difference between "MKII Crusade Armour" and "Legion MKII..."
|
 |
Morphing Obliterator
|
I think they just allow you to make different poses.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/27 17:11:01
Subject: Difference between "MKII Crusade Armour" and "Legion MKII..."
|
 |
Enigmatic Sorcerer of Chaos
|
I'm seeing the aquilla as well, so I'm just going to stick with the idea that it's poses. Especially since it's indicated in the URL of the Legion pictures.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/27 18:05:35
Subject: Difference between "MKII Crusade Armour" and "Legion MKII..."
|
 |
Secretive Dark Angels Veteran
UK - Warwickshire
|
 appologies  its the MkIII iron and crusade armours that have icon's on the chest plate vs no icons on chest plate.
I've just looked at FW's site and they use the exact same image for MKII legion and crusade versions... leading me to beleive theyre the exact same armour variants in different poses as others have said;
Legion version seems to hvae the guys holding the boltguns much higher up, as if aiming along iron sights and such, while crusade version looks more at ease.. then again that could just be the way theyre were built.
|
'Ain't nothing crazy about me but my brain. Right brain? Riight! No not you right brain! Right left brain? Right!... Okay then lets do this!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/27 23:29:38
Subject: Difference between "MKII Crusade Armour" and "Legion MKII..."
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
the other thing that seems to jump out at me, (i'm lazy, so i didn't follow through with the website about the LEgion Mk2 bit), is that MK2 crusade armor is literally just the armor, whereas the legion Mk2 kit also comes with the weapons. Doublecheck the fine-print.
|
15 successful trades as a buyer;
16 successful trades as a seller;
To glimpse the future, you must look to the past and understand it. Names may change, but human behavior repeats itself. Prophetic insight is nothing more than profound hindsight.
It doesn't matter how bloody far the apple falls from the tree. If the apple fell off of a Granny Smith, that apple is going to grow into a Granny bloody Smith. The only difference is whether that apple grows in the shade of the tree it fell from. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/28 00:43:07
Subject: Difference between "MKII Crusade Armour" and "Legion MKII..."
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Aizuwakamatsu, Fukushima, Japan
|
poda_t wrote:the other thing that seems to jump out at me, (i'm lazy, so i didn't follow through with the website about the LEgion Mk2 bit), is that MK2 crusade armor is literally just the armor, whereas the legion Mk2 kit also comes with the weapons. Doublecheck the fine-print.
Nope. Neither comes with weapons. Unless you're buying the squad packs of Legion MkII instead of the basic 5 man packs.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/28 11:16:01
Subject: Difference between "MKII Crusade Armour" and "Legion MKII..."
|
 |
Slaanesh Chosen Marine Riding a Fiend
|
Buttlerthepug wrote:
But what exactly is the difference between these two classifications on the Forgeworld site?
HairySticks wrote:
Legion version seems to hvae the guys holding the boltguns much higher up, as if aiming along iron sights and such, while crusade version looks more at ease.. then again that could just be the way theyre were built.
I took a second look at those pictures and you are right. The legion set comes with a higher variation in arm poses and few different posed legs. If you look at the pictures in the first post (or the spoilor tag) you'll notice that in the second picture the forth marine from the left has an arm pose that can't be a result of just different assembly.
Also if you look at the fifth guy you'll notice that he stands on his toes with one leg. But non of the legs in the first picture have a similar toe-bent pose.
To cut a long story short the normal set has uniform arm poses while the legion set comes with a few varying arm poses and some new leg poses.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/19 16:27:25
Subject: Difference between "MKII Crusade Armour" and "Legion MKII..."
|
 |
Bounding Ultramarine Assault Trooper
|
i realy want to buy a space marine mk2 set now.
|
SPACE MARINES
imerial guard
skitarii
space marines: an army where if morale is down you look at your commander for inspiration and you valiantly fight on and kill m any in the name of the emperor
imperial guard: if morale gets low your commander shoots one of your comrades and expects that to encourage you
|
|
 |
 |
|