Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

What do you guys think: Sword, Halberd, or Hammer.

I am building a squad that will contain a Grand Master (with sword and psychotrope grenades). He will be attached to three paladins and a paladin apothecary.

How should I arm the apothecary and the three paladins?

I run my apothecary with the stave to keep him alive and then I would probably run two hammers and a sword on the paladins

Apothecary for a 4-man squad?

That is barely worth it for 10!

But anyhow, I suggest 2 hammers, a halberd and. a sword for the apothecary.

Is the Halberd worth it? Going at I6 is nice, but isn't the boost to the invul save better?

With the rise of shooty GK armies, I would say a psycannon is a must. Banner isn't terrible but I find that it works better with a larger, deathstar squads and other close combat weapons such as falchions and halberds are too situational. Hammers are nice though. One of the only S8 in the army.