Switch Theme:

Indiana Law Makes it Illegal for Clergy to Perform Gay Marriage  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Hangin' with Gork & Mork






Article

In what appears to be a rather massive violation of the freedom of religion, the Republican party in Indiana appears to have amended the state criminal code to either make it a crime, or confirm that it remain a crime, for clergy to conduct weddings for gay couples.

While it is not widely known, numerous mainstream American religions permit gay nuptials. The faiths include reform Judaism, Evangelical Lutherans, Episcopalians, and the United Church of Christ, among others.

The amendment to the criminal code, which will go into effect on July 1, 2014, makes it a misdemeanor, punishable by up to 180 days in jail and a fine of $1,000 for clergy “solemnize” a marriage of two men or two women.

IC 31-11-11-7
Solemnization of marriage between persons prohibited from marrying
Sec. 7. A person who knowingly solemnizes a marriage of individuals who are prohibited from marrying by IC 31-11-1 commits a Class B misdemeanor.
As added by P.L.1-1997, SEC.3.


The tricky part is coming up with a definition of what “solemnizing” is. Is solemnizing conducting the marriage service, providing the married couple with a document attesting to their marriage, and/or submitting that document to the state? Depending on what exact definition of solemnizing Indiana uses, preachers might be thrown in jail for practicing their faith.

One answer to this question appears to be in this section of the Indiana code, which makes clear that solemnization is something that happens before the marriage certificate is filed with the clerk:

IC 31-11-11-8
Failure to timely file marriage license and duplicate marriage certificate
Sec. 8. A person who:
(1) solemnizes a marriage; and
(2) fails to file the marriage license and a duplicate marriage certificate with the clerk of the circuit court not later than ninety (90) days after the date the marriage was solemnized;


Note how solemnization is mentioned as something other than filing the marriage license. Solemnization is looking more and more like conducting a solemn wedding service. And that’s what priests and preachers and rabbis do. And it’s no business of the government telling them what they can and cannot do in their own church, synagogue or mosque.

A successful effort by the Indiana Republican party, which controls the state House and Senate, to legislate the permitted, and banned, practices of Jews, Lutherans, Episcopalians, and other mainstream faiths would appear to fly smack in the face of ongoing religious right efforts to brand the civil rights of gays as a threat to religion. In fact, it is anti-gay bigots who are now threatening to throw mainstream clergy in jail for simply practicing their faith.

The amended criminal code also addresses gay couples that apply for a marriage license at the county clerk. But, contrary to some reports that are saying the legislature made it a felony to apply for a “gay” marriage license, at least one Indiana newspaper is claiming that the legislature actually decreased the existing penalty for gay couples attempting to marry from a maximum of three years to 18 months.

What the amended law does is change the “crime” of applying for a “gay” marriage license from a Class D felony to a Level 6 felony – Class D was the lowest rung in the old system, Level 6 is the lowest rung in the new system. And with at least one Indiana press outlet claiming that the new Level 6 penalty is actually less than the old Class D, it’s not clear whether this might actually be a change for the better.

Along those same lines, it would be interesting to know whether it was illegal under the old criminal code for clergy to “solemnize” same-sex nuptials, or whether this is a new crime. Regardless, the state Republican party either made it a crime, or intentionally kept it a crime, in the amended criminal code they just enacted into law.



Amidst the mists and coldest frosts he thrusts his fists against the posts and still insists he sees the ghosts.
 
   
Made in us
Nurgle Predator Driver with an Infestation




OKLAHOMA!!!

Wow, they try deny someone their constitutional rights of freedom of religion and keep same sex marriages illegal.

WTF, Rebulicans?

 
   
Made in gb
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps





South Wales

Frankly I find it disgusting that theses gays keep trying to ruin the sanctity of marriage.

Go Indiana!

Prestor Jon wrote:
Because children don't have any legal rights until they're adults. A minor is the responsiblity of the parent and has no legal rights except through his/her legal guardian or parent.
 
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran






 MrDwhitey wrote:
Frankly I find it disgusting that theses gays keep trying to ruin the sanctity of marriage.

Go Indiana!


If I were to pray I would pray you are joking.
   
Made in us
Member of the Ethereal Council






sqir666 wrote:

WTF, Rebulicans?

We have been asking that for years now

5000pts 6000pts 3000pts
 
   
Made in us
Blood Angel Captain Wracked with Visions






Yeah... I don't see this being allowed to stand even if it does somehow make it into law.

 
   
Made in us
[DCM]
The Main Man






Beast Coast

There's no way it will last.

   
Made in us
Member of the Ethereal Council






Still, it is disturbing that they think they can do that.

5000pts 6000pts 3000pts
 
   
Made in us
Blood Angel Captain Wracked with Visions






 hotsauceman1 wrote:
Still, it is disturbing that they think they can do that.

It's political grand standing, I doubt very much that they honestly believe this will be allowed to stand.

 
   
Made in us
[DCM]
The Main Man






Beast Coast

 hotsauceman1 wrote:
Still, it is disturbing that they think they can do that.



Some of the things that the Democrats think they can do are disturbing as well. Luckily, they were also wrong.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/07/09 23:49:59


   
Made in us
Tzeentch Aspiring Sorcerer Riding a Disc




The darkness between the stars

Guys guys. Let us all jsut come to admit it, both sides are fethed up!

On subject of the Indiana law. Oh yeah republicans... real cool. Go on and on about the personal liberties of the people before promptly spinning around and making it illegal for people to marry. Oh, and to make matters better go on ahead and dabble in official religions! Have fun~

2375
/ 1690
WIP (1875)
1300
760
WIP (350)
WIP (150) 
   
Made in us
Member of the Ethereal Council






I will admit, both side fight for the sake of fighting, quite frankly i think both sides have unresolved sexual feelings for the other. This bi-partisanship will only end when they admit their feelings for the other.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/07/10 00:08:53


5000pts 6000pts 3000pts
 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Well.....since it doesn't effect me I really don't care

Proud Member of the Infidels of OIF/OEF
No longer defending the US Military or US Gov't. Just going to ""**feed into your fears**"" with Duffel Blog
Did not fight my way up on top the food chain to become a Vegan...
Warning: Stupid Allergy
Once you pull the pin, Mr. Grenade is no longer your friend
DE 6700
Harlequin 2500
RIP Muhammad Ali.

Jihadin, Scorched Earth 791. Leader of the Pork Eating Crusader. Alpha


 
   
Made in us
5th God of Chaos! (Yea'rly!)




The Great State of Texas

 Ahtman wrote:
Article

In what appears to be a rather massive violation of the freedom of religion, the Republican party in Indiana appears to have amended the state criminal code to either make it a crime, or confirm that it remain a crime, for clergy to conduct weddings for gay couples.

While it is not widely known, numerous mainstream American religions permit gay nuptials. The faiths include reform Judaism, Evangelical Lutherans, Episcopalians, and the United Church of Christ, among others.

The amendment to the criminal code, which will go into effect on July 1, 2014, makes it a misdemeanor, punishable by up to 180 days in jail and a fine of $1,000 for clergy “solemnize” a marriage of two men or two women.

IC 31-11-11-7
Solemnization of marriage between persons prohibited from marrying
Sec. 7. A person who knowingly solemnizes a marriage of individuals who are prohibited from marrying by IC 31-11-1 commits a Class B misdemeanor.
As added by P.L.1-1997, SEC.3.


The tricky part is coming up with a definition of what “solemnizing” is. Is solemnizing conducting the marriage service, providing the married couple with a document attesting to their marriage, and/or submitting that document to the state? Depending on what exact definition of solemnizing Indiana uses, preachers might be thrown in jail for practicing their faith.

One answer to this question appears to be in this section of the Indiana code, which makes clear that solemnization is something that happens before the marriage certificate is filed with the clerk:

IC 31-11-11-8
Failure to timely file marriage license and duplicate marriage certificate
Sec. 8. A person who:
(1) solemnizes a marriage; and
(2) fails to file the marriage license and a duplicate marriage certificate with the clerk of the circuit court not later than ninety (90) days after the date the marriage was solemnized;


Note how solemnization is mentioned as something other than filing the marriage license. Solemnization is looking more and more like conducting a solemn wedding service. And that’s what priests and preachers and rabbis do. And it’s no business of the government telling them what they can and cannot do in their own church, synagogue or mosque.

A successful effort by the Indiana Republican party, which controls the state House and Senate, to legislate the permitted, and banned, practices of Jews, Lutherans, Episcopalians, and other mainstream faiths would appear to fly smack in the face of ongoing religious right efforts to brand the civil rights of gays as a threat to religion. In fact, it is anti-gay bigots who are now threatening to throw mainstream clergy in jail for simply practicing their faith.

The amended criminal code also addresses gay couples that apply for a marriage license at the county clerk. But, contrary to some reports that are saying the legislature made it a felony to apply for a “gay” marriage license, at least one Indiana newspaper is claiming that the legislature actually decreased the existing penalty for gay couples attempting to marry from a maximum of three years to 18 months.

What the amended law does is change the “crime” of applying for a “gay” marriage license from a Class D felony to a Level 6 felony – Class D was the lowest rung in the old system, Level 6 is the lowest rung in the new system. And with at least one Indiana press outlet claiming that the new Level 6 penalty is actually less than the old Class D, it’s not clear whether this might actually be a change for the better.

Along those same lines, it would be interesting to know whether it was illegal under the old criminal code for clergy to “solemnize” same-sex nuptials, or whether this is a new crime. Regardless, the state Republican party either made it a crime, or intentionally kept it a crime, in the amended criminal code they just enacted into law.


Ayah that pretty much punches the First Amendment right in the face. I have faith gay rights groups and religions will punch back.


-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Leerstetten, Germany

It's a pointless law that doesn't do anything and is nothing but grand-standing by the GOP.

Great, it makes it a crime to do something that you cannot do to begin with. How does that law change a single damn thing in Indiana?

Hey guys, it's illegal to perform an illegal marriage!



It's a law that doesn't mean jack now (since it is illegal for gay people to marry anyway), and won't mean jack once it becomes legal for gay people to marry since you can't illegally perform a legal wedding.

It's just a case of idiot politicians passing a law that doesn't do anything so that people think that they actually did something so that they can have something to run on during their next election.

Ignore the trolls, they will go away.
   
Made in us
Hallowed Canoness





The Void

That article like the others reporting this is guilty of bad writing and worse reporting: http://www.bilerico.com/2013/07/slow_down_indianas_new_marriage_law_isnt_real.php

Per Indiana State Code Solemnization is a legal term for what a priest or other holy type individual does before signing off on and sending in a marriage license. Bob and Tom can still have a religious service, they just can't get the legal status to go with it because they cannot receive a marriage license. Still can't receive a marriage license, because that's been that way since '97 apparently. Not saying that's not pathetic, but not what the original article's author wants it to be.

I beg of you sarge let me lead the charge when the battle lines are drawn
Lemme at least leave a good hoof beat they'll remember loud and long


SoB, IG, SM, SW, Nec, Cus, Tau, FoW Germans, Team Yankee Marines, Battletech Clan Wolf, Mercs
DR:90-SG+M+B+I+Pw40k12+ID+++A+++/are/WD-R+++T(S)DM+ 
   
Made in us
Dwarf High King with New Book of Grudges




United States

 KalashnikovMarine wrote:

Per Indiana State Code Solemnization is a legal term for what a priest or other holy type individual does before signing off on and sending in a marriage license.


Not just clergy. Any authorized official who signs a marriage license solemnizes the marriage in the act of signing it. Granted, at least in Indiana, not all clergy are recognized as clergy by the state.

Life does not cease to be funny when people die any more than it ceases to be serious when people laugh. 
   
Made in us
Hallowed Canoness





The Void

That is correct, my apologies for not giving a more complete definition.

Edit:

Apparently you're incorrect on some clergy not being recognized though.


IC 31-11-6-1 Persons authorized to solemnize marriages Sec. 1. Marriages may be solemnized by any of the following: (1) A member of the clergy of a religious organization (even if the cleric does not perform religious functions for an individual congregation), such as a minister of the gospel, a priest, a bishop, an archbishop, or a rabbi. (2) A judge. (3) A mayor, within the mayor's county. (4) A clerk or a clerk-treasurer of a city or town, within a county in which the city or town is located. (5) A clerk of the circuit court. (6) The Friends Church, in accordance with the rules of the Friends Church. (7) The German Baptists, in accordance with the rules of their society. (8) The Bahai faith, in accordance with the rules of the Bahai faith. (9) The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, in accordance with the rules of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. (10) An imam of a masjid (mosque), in accordance with the rules of the religion of Islam.


Bold my own. My own Universal Life Church notes that the state of Indiana may require ministers like myself who wish to perform marriages in the state to provide proof of ordination and/or a letter of good standing from the church, but that's about it!

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/07/10 14:24:00


I beg of you sarge let me lead the charge when the battle lines are drawn
Lemme at least leave a good hoof beat they'll remember loud and long


SoB, IG, SM, SW, Nec, Cus, Tau, FoW Germans, Team Yankee Marines, Battletech Clan Wolf, Mercs
DR:90-SG+M+B+I+Pw40k12+ID+++A+++/are/WD-R+++T(S)DM+ 
   
Made in jp
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer






Somewhere in south-central England.

It will be interesting to see the police arresting rabbis and so on who go ahead and solemnize marriages despite the law.

I'm writing a load of fiction. My latest story starts here... This is the index of all the stories...

We're not very big on official rules. Rules lead to people looking for loopholes. What's here is about it. 
   
Made in us
Hallowed Canoness





The Void

This law's been on the books since 97, so I think you'll be waiting quite a long time for those photos.

The idea with solemnizing a restricted marriage is that it's aiding and abetting fraud willfully. Restricted marriages in Indiana include: Bigamy, incest, marriage of an underage individual, forced marriage, so called "gay" marriage and a couple other types and again, this isn't a new law.

I beg of you sarge let me lead the charge when the battle lines are drawn
Lemme at least leave a good hoof beat they'll remember loud and long


SoB, IG, SM, SW, Nec, Cus, Tau, FoW Germans, Team Yankee Marines, Battletech Clan Wolf, Mercs
DR:90-SG+M+B+I+Pw40k12+ID+++A+++/are/WD-R+++T(S)DM+ 
   
Made in gb
Agile Revenant Titan





Scotland

 MrDwhitey wrote:
Frankly I find it disgusting that theses gays keep trying to ruin the sanctity of marriage.

Go Indiana!


Frankly, I find it disgusting that one can be so locked into his own dogmatic view of the "sanctity" of marriage.

Iranna.

 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Frankly, I find it disgusting that one can be so locked into his own dogmatic view of the "sanctity" of marriage.


Ease up there. You can tell its from a religious point of view. You adding "sanctity" is a shot at opening this thread into a religious debate. Just saying you know. I really hate that type thread

Proud Member of the Infidels of OIF/OEF
No longer defending the US Military or US Gov't. Just going to ""**feed into your fears**"" with Duffel Blog
Did not fight my way up on top the food chain to become a Vegan...
Warning: Stupid Allergy
Once you pull the pin, Mr. Grenade is no longer your friend
DE 6700
Harlequin 2500
RIP Muhammad Ali.

Jihadin, Scorched Earth 791. Leader of the Pork Eating Crusader. Alpha


 
   
Made in gb
Renegade Inquisitor de Marche






Elephant Graveyard

 Iranna wrote:
 MrDwhitey wrote:
Frankly I find it disgusting that theses gays keep trying to ruin the sanctity of marriage.

Go Indiana!


Frankly, I find it disgusting that one can be so locked into his own dogmatic view of the "sanctity" of marriage.

Iranna.

Anyone who took Whitey seriously has gained a small understanding of Poe's Law.

Dakka Bingo! By Ouze
"You are the best at flying things"-Kanluwen
"Further proof that Purple is a fething brilliant super villain " -KingCracker
"Purp.. Im pretty sure I have a gun than can reach you...."-Nicorex
"That's not really an apocalypse. That's just Europe."-Grakmar
"almost as good as winning free cake at the tea drinking contest for an Englishman." -Reds8n
Seal up your lips and give no words but mum.
Equip, Reload. Do violence.
Watch for Gerry. 
   
Made in ca
Depraved Slaanesh Chaos Lord





I'm sure D-USA or someone has likely alreay stated this, but just in case it was missed:

This is vapid grandstanding, proposed knowing that it will fail in every way possible, yet still appease the local constituents with a veneer of pandering to the vocal demands of an extreme-conservative minority.

Politics at its finest.
   
 
Forum Index » Off-Topic Forum
Go to: