Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

no you choose the model no randomisation in it at all

the wound itself comes from the nob and is allocated according to the controlling player. RaW and RaI, a nob isn't about to smack his big shoota guy until he has to no is he

Lol I'm being trolled by someone who to this day has failed to provide any evidence backing their claims up with any evidence when it comes to discussions I have been involved in, but fine by me lets notch another one up to me.

paraphrasing the fluff crap out,

Each time you fail a morale check a unit with a boss pole you may choose to inflict a wound on the unit....(not the guy carrying it)..."

therefore i allocate said wound to a model in the UNIT as there is no actual focal point of said attack only restriction of not the carrier . nothing has been faq'd to say other wise


Automatically Appended Next Post:
and as a note Nosferatu if you want to claim peoples assertions are invalid for not going to the codex for such a simple thing take note of your point yourself on all future rule checks as i can count 8 off hand you have provided your I am right you are wrong assertions without ANY rules quotes

the big shhota boy was an example, jeeeesh the point remains a model in the unit is wounded and since there is no point of wounding, i.e the nob, i choose where the wound goes, and the count has just shot upto 12 now where he is claiming the i am right your wrong and no quotes and in 5 cases off hand he has been proven to be worng but demands that others prove their side repeatedly after being caught out, and you rigeld are yet another