Switch Theme:

Changes to Mission rules for my group. Please lend your opinions.  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Horrific Howling Banshee






Charleston, South Carolina

Minimum distance between objectives is 18" rather than 12".

No more than one objective can be placed in each deployment zone.

The remaining objectives must be placed in the no man's land area.

The 'odd' objective when placing 3 or 5 total objectives, must be placed on the center line of no man's land.

In the scouring, randomly place one objective in each 2' by 2' section of the board. Roll deviation from the center of each section using the small arrow and disregarding the hit indicator.

The purpose of these changes is to force people to move.

Innocence is no Excuse
15,000
8,000
9,000
Nids:5,000 
   
Made in us
Tail-spinning Tomb Blade Pilot





Los Angeles, CA

Hey ArmyC,

I just posted new missions featuring the scatter mechanic you described! I think scattering objectives spice up the game play a bit as well.

DZC - Scourge
 
   
Made in gb
Tunneling Trygon





Nottinghamshire- England

Forcing people to move is fine for armies designed to move.

Armies like Gunlines will struggle and I don't think that's.... it hurts to say this... I don't think that's FAIR to the gunline players (urgh..)

I play an All out Assualty Nid Army and we do fine for objectives. We tend to place as many as we can in the centerish, or one in a crazy place away from the enemy, and then charge forward. Tervigons take the midway lines with the rest of my force just rolling over and smashing or dying at the enemies feet.

Grimtuff wrote: GW want the full wrath of their Gestapo to come down on this new fangled Internet and it's free speech.


A Town Called Malus wrote: Draigo is a Mat Ward creation. They don't follow the same rules as everyone else.
 
   
Made in us
Horrific Howling Banshee






Charleston, South Carolina

Thought I would get more responce.

Does everyone like gunlines?

Innocence is no Excuse
15,000
8,000
9,000
Nids:5,000 
   
Made in gb
Tunneling Trygon





Nottinghamshire- England

No I hate them.

I can't stand still. Bores me too much.

Boring to play against. But it's a challenge if you can survive the first round.

Grimtuff wrote: GW want the full wrath of their Gestapo to come down on this new fangled Internet and it's free speech.


A Town Called Malus wrote: Draigo is a Mat Ward creation. They don't follow the same rules as everyone else.
 
   
Made in gb
Ambitious Acothyst With Agonizer




The other thing to do against gun lines is to contest the objectives near them and force them to move to even get a draw.

Many a time has my army been almost evicerated but ive still won the game through tactics and placement, whereas the opponet has just pointed and clicked and killed a lot more, but lost through the objectives.





 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: