Poll |
 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 06:47:19
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Stalwart Space Marine
|
Which faction would you say is least developed by GW in terms of fluff and models?
Personally I'd have to say SoB
|
You carry the Emperor's will as your torch, with it destroy the shadows.
http://i.imgur.com/a1ZES.gif |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 06:51:40
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
EmperorsChosen wrote:Which faction would you say is least developed by GW in terms of fluff and models?
Personally I'd have to say SoB
There isn't even a discussion to be had on this one any more, with Dark Eldar and Necrons getting their revamps, Black Tempars being rolled into the vanilla dex, the Adepta Soroitas as they are now called, are the least developed by a country mile. And we all know it.
/thread.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 07:03:56
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Crazed Spirit of the Defiler
|
Orks and Sisters...poor poor sisters :(
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 07:59:26
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
SoB. But I'm confident that they shall recieve plenty of development in due course, once the plastics are ready to go.
Also, how are the Orks as underdeveloped? They're certainly not in terms of models, they have plastics. Don't know exactly how they measure up to the SoB in terms of fluff development, though. I don't think that the Greenskins have ever lacked for fluff. But I could be wrong.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/10/18 11:57:22
Order of the Righteous Armour - 542 points so far. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 08:03:21
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Beautiful and Deadly Keeper of Secrets
|
Oddly enough, if you want to count outside GW Codex, The Sisters of Battle and the Church are given quite a bit of info, especially by FFG.
Outside these codex materials Eldar Fluff is lacking by comparison. In terms of lore, fluff, and overall use in FFG/Black library (once you cut the completely lore breaking C.S goto ones) with Dark Eldar getting even less then that.
Sisters have the worst development in the model range however, but their fluff isn't that bad compared to Xenos once you factor in FFG's wonderful RPG books.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 08:07:31
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Swift Swooping Hawk
|
Squats
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 08:30:06
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Stalwart Space Marine
The Sawmill
|
Tyranids need love, and soon. Adepta Sororitas too.
|
"and the most pimpin' of them all... were the Salamanders.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 11:51:24
Subject: Re:Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Pulsating Possessed Space Marine of Slaanesh
|
Sisters. Just about everyone else actually has a proper book and model range.
|
CSM/Daemon Party
The Spiky Grot Legion
The Heavily-Ignored Pedro and Friends
In the grim darkness of the 41st Millenium, there are no indicators. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 13:01:16
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I voted space marines because Iron hands dont even have a special character.
|
In before thread lock. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 13:56:59
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Sinister Chaos Marine
|
Gitsmasher wrote: I voted space marines because Iron hands dont even have a special character.
Interesting choice...I would say that considering Space Marines let you choose which sub faction you want to play, they seem developed...unless, of course, you were joking.
On topic...either SoB or the non daemon/marine Chaos. I feel there's a fair bit about human champions of Chaos being missed out on, personally.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 14:20:09
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Sister Vastly Superior
|
Voting space marines because you wanted to vote BA, combined with some of the other bad things related to being in a combined codex (IH characters etc) is kinda understandable.
Wrong, but understandable.
|
I collect:
Guard - 2k of mostly infantry
DA - 2k of deathwing, 2k of other bits (no vehicles)
Sisters - mostly converted/proxy because I'm waiting for therange to go plastic.
Tau - 2k with no riptides because I can. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 14:29:29
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Perfect Shot Black Templar Predator Pilot
|
Black Templars
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 14:31:12
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
Sisters. There is a lot that is up in the air anymore in terms of the fluff and how much of the old stuff is still valid.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 14:39:09
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
Again, they got plastics and finecast. So definitely not in terms of models. But for fluff, maybe. SoB have been around for longer.
ClockworkZion wrote:There is a lot that is up in the air anymore in terms of the fluff and how much of the old stuff is still valid.
I'm of the opinion that if it isn't retconned, then it's still valid. The passage of time is not a retcon, after all.
But yeah, I'm hopeful that the (extremely imminent!) codex will expand upon or reiterate some things.
|
Order of the Righteous Armour - 542 points so far. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 14:39:16
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Terrifying Doombull
|
Sisters Of Battle wins this one by a long shot
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 14:54:28
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
Troike wrote: ClockworkZion wrote:There is a lot that is up in the air anymore in terms of the fluff and how much of the old stuff is still valid.
I'm of the opinion that if it isn't retconned, then it's still valid. The passage of time is not a retcon, after all.
But yeah, I'm hopeful that the (extremely imminent!) codex will expand upon or reiterate some things.
That was the point really though, it has never been addressed again making it suspect, even if it hasn't been contradicted or changed yet.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 14:58:22
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I don't see how it can't be Sisters, unless you include long gone factions like Harlequins, Exodites or Genestealer Cults.
|
hello |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 15:00:54
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Screaming Shining Spear
|
I think a lot of people see this question as a 'who needs a Codex the most' instead of question asked. Of all the factions in the GW listed, the Dark Eldar are the least developed in overall information.
|
Farseer Faenyin
7,100 pts Yme-Loc Eldar(Apoc Included) / 5,700 pts (Non-Apoc)
Record for 6th Edition- Eldar: 25-4-2
Record for 7th Edition -
Eldar: 0-0-0 (Yes, I feel it is that bad)
Battlefleet Gothic: 2,750 pts of Craftworld Eldar
X-wing(Focusing on Imperials): CR90, 6 TIE Fighters, 4 TIE Interceptors, TIE Bomber, TIE Advanced, 4 X-wings, 3 A-wings, 3 B-wings, Y-wing, Z-95
Battletech: Battlion and Command Lance of 3025 Mechs(painted as 21st Rim Worlds) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 15:01:46
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
Why's it suspect? We know that it only hasn't been touched upon again due to a lack of focus on the SoB, that's the main reason. If the Sisters got lots of expansive updates and the 2e stuff stayed in 2e than maybe I'd be slightly more willing to accept your view, but after 2e all they got was a shared 'dex with the Ordo Hereticus and a WD codex. Which isn't a lot.
|
Order of the Righteous Armour - 542 points so far. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 15:01:55
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Sister Vastly Superior
|
If you're going there, its kroot, or demiurge.
|
I collect:
Guard - 2k of mostly infantry
DA - 2k of deathwing, 2k of other bits (no vehicles)
Sisters - mostly converted/proxy because I'm waiting for therange to go plastic.
Tau - 2k with no riptides because I can. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 15:04:27
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
|
Well, they're not really factions as far as in-game armies are concerned.
|
Check out my Youtube channel!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 15:28:05
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
Well, it appears that SoB are the least developed these days. This might be the reason that they didn't get a new codex yet (just a semi-codex at the WD level).
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 15:41:35
Subject: Re:Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Tea-Kettle of Blood
Adelaide, South Australia
|
I voted other, the Space Pokémon are a really underdeveloped faction.
|
Ailaros wrote:You know what really bugs me? When my opponent, before they show up at the FLGS smears themselves in peanut butter and then makes blood sacrifices to Ashterai by slitting the throat of three male chickens and then smears the spatter pattern into the peanut butter to engrave sacred symbols into their chest and upper arms.
I have a peanut allergy. It's really inconsiderate.
"Long ago in a distant land, I, M'kar, the shape-shifting Master of Chaos, unleashed an unspeakable evil! But a foolish Grey Knight warrior wielding a magic sword stepped forth to oppose me. Before the final blow was struck, I tore open a portal in space and flung him into the Warp, where my evil is law! Now the fool seeks to return to real-space, and undo the evil that is Chaos!" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 16:17:42
Subject: Re:Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I voted other. I think the Inquisition has been super nerfed. You can't have a generic inquisitor running around with out grey knights any more. I'd collect a guard allied detachment if I could make an Inquisition primary detachment.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 16:28:46
Subject: Re:Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
DJGietzen wrote:I voted other. I think the Inquisition has been super nerfed. You can't have a generic inquisitor running around with out grey knights any more. I'd collect a guard allied detachment if I could make an Inquisition primary detachment.
That's not really a "development" issue but rather a "play" issue though.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 18:05:43
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Three Color Minimum
|
shamikebab wrote:Squats
any faction that has a codex being sold now still has more development then the Squats.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 18:08:08
Subject: Re:Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Growlin' Guntrukk Driver with Killacannon
octarius.Lets krump da bugs!
|
Squats.Duh.
|
Kote!
Kandosii sa ka'rte, vode an.
Coruscanta a'den mhi, vode an.
Bal kote,Darasuum kote,
Jorso'ran kando a tome.
Sa kyr'am nau tracyn kad vode an.
Bal...
Motir ca'tra nau tracinya.
Gra'tua cuun hett su dralshy'a.
Aruetyc talyc runi'la trattok'a.
Sa kyr'am nau tracyn kad, vode an! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 18:10:04
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
The Last Chancer Who Survived
|
Heh. My laugh goes to the 9 people that voted "Space Marines"
Probably all joking though
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 18:15:41
Subject: Re:Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Hellacious Havoc
United States
|
While I have never played sisters or orks, they don't seem terribly apealling. That being said, I am sorry but I really do think Necrons. "Oh lets make everything LD 10 and Fearless. Oh and everything that isn't a SM Scout in a shiny paint job will ignore armor saves and move 12 inches." They might as well be from a screenplay written by Michael Bay.
|
Chaos. Good News |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/18 18:19:31
Subject: Which faction is least developed by GW?
|
 |
Beautiful and Deadly Keeper of Secrets
|
Selym wrote:Heh. My laugh goes to the 9 people that voted "Space Marines"
Probably all joking though 
Could be Dark Angel players.
|
|
 |
 |
|