Switch Theme:

Looks like we're snowden for Chrismas  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Trustworthy Shas'vre





Mt. Gretna, PA

Here is the article:
http://nypost.com/2013/12/26/snowden-references-george-orwell-in-christmas-day-video/

Really though, what steps can we take to maintain our privacy when people welcome the very technology that takes it away?

 Goliath wrote:
 Gentleman_Jellyfish wrote:
What kind of drugs do you have to be on to see Hitler in your teapot?
Whichever they are, I'm not on the Reich ones, clearly.
 
   
Made in gb
Avatar of the Bloody-Handed God






Inside your mind, corrupting the pathways

You can welcome the technology but take issue with some of the ways people/institutions use it.

   
Made in us
Kid_Kyoto






Probably work

 The Bringer wrote:
Here is the article:
http://nypost.com/2013/12/26/snowden-references-george-orwell-in-christmas-day-video/

Really though, what steps can we take to maintain our privacy when people welcome the very technology that takes it away?


Interesting question.

Steps we CAN take, if we wanted to do it right:

The "technological elite" can build better encryption mechanisms (with open specifications) and begin implementing them by default in communication programs, preferably end-to-end such that the message is never encrypted using only the remote server's key.

Everyone else can educate themselves on encryption methods, at least at a basic level. We can all learn how to see whether our banking webpages do a push request with our plaintext account numbers in them over an unsecure connection or not, and why that's bad. We can write to congress critters and vote based on candidates with a privacy-respecting background.

Steps we WILL take, because no one cares:

Continue with the status quo, grumbling about it but not forcing change.

Assume all my mathhammer comes from here: https://github.com/daed/mathhammer 
   
 
Forum Index » Off-Topic Forum
Go to: