Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Hi all

So, I've read on other threads about "The Most Durable Unit in the Game"

As I learnt from a thread a while ago, you cannot take Farsight enclave with a Tau ally that has Aun'va. But let's say that's up for debate:

O'Vesa with Aun'va to make a near invincible unit? (by shooting anyways...)

What does dakka think? Is it allowed? Would it be too much cheese?

Cheers!

I'm not sure what the point of speculating about an illegal unit is. We might as well speculate about how the most durable unit ever would be my Shadowsword with a re-rollable 2++.

text removed.

Reds8n

 Swastakowey wrote:
Who cares, let him talk. Someone else may find it interesting and want to discuss it.

I'm sorry, but what part of "I wanted to come up with a cheesy overpowered unit, this one isn't even legal but look how overpowered it is" will lead to constructive discussion? It isn't legal so virtually everyone is going to say "no, you can't use it", and even if the OP somehow convinces someone to let them use it the most likely result is the OP's Riptide model getting thrown across the room.
.

I though that you couldn't Take Aun'va AND Farsight IN THE SAME detachement if you played the Farsight Enclave detachement.

But if they are in different allied detachement, i do think it works.

 Slayer le boucher wrote:
I though that you couldn't Take Aun'va AND Farsight IN THE SAME detachement if you played the Farsight Enclave detachement.

But if they are in different allied detachement, i do think it works.

And this preggrine (or however you spell it) is why you let people discuss things. And who cares, its a forum. Unlike you i live elsewhere.

 Slayer le boucher wrote:
I though that you couldn't Take Aun'va AND Farsight IN THE SAME detachement if you played the Farsight Enclave detachement.

But if they are in different allied detachement, i do think it works.

The rule says "same army", not "same detachment". If you take a Farsight detachment you are banned from taking Aun'va anywhere in your army.

 Peregrine wrote:

 Slayer le boucher wrote:
I though that you couldn't Take Aun'va AND Farsight IN THE SAME detachement if you played the Farsight Enclave detachement.

But if they are in different allied detachement, i do think it works.

The rule says "same army", not "same detachment". If you take a Farsight detachment you are banned from taking Aun'va anywhere in your army.

That wasnt hard was it.

 Peregrine wrote:

 Slayer le boucher wrote:
I though that you couldn't Take Aun'va AND Farsight IN THE SAME detachement if you played the Farsight Enclave detachement.

But if they are in different allied detachement, i do think it works.

The rule says "same army", not "same detachment". If you take a Farsight detachment you are banned from taking Aun'va anywhere in your army.

I see...,indeed if it is put that way, there isn't much you can do about it.

While funny enough you can take Ethereals iirc.

There's a section saying that when the Enclave first set on their expedition they had Ethereal accompanying them.