Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Okay so I'm trying to wrap my head around the last sentence:

"Blows made by (or against), non-invisible units in the same combat are resolved normally."

We can break this sentence down to:

1) "Blows made by non-invisible units in the same combat are resolved normally."

and

2) "Blows made against non-invisible units in the same combat are resolved normally."

both these refer to friendly models from the invisible unit's side during a multiple combat, right?

Because if it referred to enemy units (which are also non-invisible units), then that would contradict the previous sentence, where their WS is specifically reduced to 1.

Honestly Mate, it doesn't matter.

Come Saturday Invisibilty is being changed anyway

 Sir Arun wrote:
Okay so I'm trying to wrap my head around the last sentence:

"Blows made by (or against), non-invisible units in the same combat are resolved normally."

We can break this sentence down to:

1) "Blows made by non-invisible units in the same combat are resolved normally."

and

2) "Blows made against non-invisible units in the same combat are resolved normally."

both these refer to friendly models from the invisible unit's side during a multiple combat, right?

Because if it referred to enemy units (which are also non-invisible units), then that would contradict the previous sentence, where their WS is specifically reduced to 1

The first sentence is a restriction on a non-invisible unit when it is striking an invisible unit, so it takes precedence over the second sentence when the non-invisible unit is striking an invisible unit.

AKA How do you normally resolve blows from a non-invisible unit that is striking an invisible unit? Well you normally resolve those at WS1