Switch Theme:

do you find yourself playing fewer games of 40k since 5th?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




Cincy, OH

I am playing as frequently (every Friday or Saturday night, sometimes both), but we are getting fewer games in. This is simply because we are learning a new rule set. We should be back up to pace here in a couple of months.

I have 20+ games of 5th so far.

To be totally honest I don't think it is an overall improvement over 4th, it is just different. Somethings are better yes, but some things are worse.

I am in the TLOS sucks camp. It works, but Area Terrain was better and faster. Vehicle movement vs. firing constraints suck, especially when you add in attacking rear armor. Intervening units and cover saves suck/stupid. Its TLOS except you can kill models you can't see is totally contradictory, but what ever.

The new missions/deployments and mission special rules are excellent. Wound allocation is excellent.

burp. 
   
Made in us
Perfect Shot Black Templar Predator Pilot





Greenville

I built my Black Templar and Imperial Guard armies around 4th Edition's rules and quirks. In 5th, I find my IG lackluster (and am currently waiting for a new codex before expanding them any more) and my BT more powerful. Not that they were a beast of an army to begin with, but now with Run and the new Assault resolution rules, I find them tougher, faster, and more surviveable all around.

My Deathwing was built in the first month of 5th Edition. I originally though they were going to be a "meh" class of army that took an awesome unit, fielded bunches of them, and then performed badly on the field. However that was not the case. I've played about 10 games with them, and am very satisfied with my 6 wins and 3 ties.

They may not be the shootiest army out there (though with so many Assault Cannons and Storm Bolters, some may beg to differ!) but they are damn hard to kill, especially when you have 30 of them sitting on one or two objectives waiting for your opponent to try and move at them.

In all, I play a lot more games, but I have noticed a trend in my army of choice in that it has shifted from Black Templars to IG to Deathwing. I still play all 3 armies (and am planning on Orks, Armored Company and Thousand Sons CSM in the future), but with 5th Edition's new rules, I've changed my style of play -- as well as the armies I field -- in order to compensate for the new rules.

CK

"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling, which thinks that nothing is worth war, is much worse. The person, who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
-- John Stuart Mill

Black Templars (8000), Imperial Guard (3000), Sanguinary Host (2000), Tau Empire (1850), Bloodaxes (3000) 
   
 
Forum Index » Dakka Discussions
Go to: