Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Does anyone else not like the plasma tanks gun?

it looks like a plasma blast gun but small

That is some sexy plasma death!

What on earth is that Bad@$$ floating building at the back of the Demolisher box

Photshopped nonsense?

And is it wrong that I like the mini-plasma blastgun on the Executioner? I think it looks just fine!

I like the new Executioner better than the ForgeWorld version because it finally gets the updated plasma gun design. Those old plasma cannons were just so... penisy. (sic?)

Looks like Straken has been hunting Tarellian Dog-soldiers!

Elusive71 wrote:I like the new Executioner better than the ForgeWorld version because it finally gets the updated plasma gun design. Those old plasma cannons were just so... penisy. (sic?)

Looks like Straken has been hunting Tarellian Dog-soldiers!

I agree. Prior plasma designs had a definite phallic vibe. The newer gun would be better if it was not as square, a bit wider and thinner and it would be perfect.

Durandal wrote:

Elusive71 wrote:I like the new Executioner better than the ForgeWorld version because it finally gets the updated plasma gun design. Those old plasma cannons were just so... penisy. (sic?)

Looks like Straken has been hunting Tarellian Dog-soldiers!

I agree. Prior plasma designs had a definite phallic vibe. The newer gun would be better if it was not as square, a bit wider and thinner and it would be perfect.

So in other words, more 'penisy' again?

Psychologists would have a field day on forums such as these.

It's interesting to see how some people, after complaining that the Bane Wolf chem cannon is too phallic, are calling for penis-shaped cannons on their tanks.

Some people here must have serious compensation issues. Like they say, quantity is a quality all of its own.

Cheese Elemental wrote:It's interesting to see how some people, after complaining that the Bane Wolf chem cannon is too phallic, are calling for penis-shaped cannons on their tanks.

Some people here must have serious compensation issues. Like they say, quantity is a quality all of its own.

or you could realize people do this thing...it's called "joking", I think?

Sheesh. People taking the Internet seriously, what is this world coming to.

What, you think I'm being serious?

I'm the worst slow around here. Nothing I say is serious.

-disappointed-

GW has a big chance to really do a good job, show off, and make the model worth the f@#$%^g price they are g@# f@#$%^g d$%^(t charging their player for a SINGLE tank. And what do they do? Pop some cheeks on the thing, FINALLY after almost twenty years update the sponson and hull weapons, but ignore EVERYTHING else that is wrong about the tank.

I am usually against hurting GW, but if someone started selling home made versions for even the same price as GW (exactly the same, right down to the plastic used even), I would buy from them. I am, again in my life, wholy supportive of GW taking a nice big swing kick to the groin from Sly Marbo. If 90% of their staff got laid off, I wouldn't feel bad. They need new blood, cheaper blood that is actually willing to work for the money they are raping in.