Off-topic Lurkers?

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**jp400**

I have to agree with Dogma on this one. I will leave it at that.

**Clthomps**

dogma wrote:
Gwar! wrote:
dogma wrote:
Gwar! wrote:
Seriously though, if you are gonna insult me, Insult me Properly. I report it anyway.
What was that you were saying about being childish?
It's called irony.

Sure, if you take your definition of irony from Alanis Morissette.

Its ironic that you would attack other people for their childishness while behaving in a childish manner. It isn't ironic for me to call attention to that irony. Unless you think anyone calling you out on anything must be childish. In which case you probably have a poor understanding of the behavior of children, or lack the ability to effectively shield yourself from criticism. That e-peen you boast suggests a combination of the two.

Watch out Dogma, quoting definitions to Gwar is grounds for a 3 day ban.

**generalgrog**

whatwhat wrote:
I have the same problem. I eat most things, but once I throw something up I have no desire to eat it.

That's almost worth sigging!

GG

**Jin**

This thread is like watching a train accident in slow motion.

/grabs popcorn

**Waaagh_Gonads**

Its been borderline lockable for awhile but has pulled itself back.

If Gwar hadn't jumped in I'd have probably stopped it there, but he has so it goes on.

Constructive critisism of posting styles should be allowed, personal attack not.

Also for red heads you reallyt need to get creative for names. Here in Australia we call them a 'ranga' short for orangutan.

**Gwar!**

Waaagh_Gonads wrote:If Gwar hadn't jumped in I'd have probably stopped it there, but he has so it goes on.

And they say I am a bad Person!

**jp400**

Clthomps wrote:
Watch out Dogma, quoting definitions to Gwar is grounds for a 3 day ban.

True, But sad......

**youngblood**

Gwar! wrote:
And they say I am a bad Person!

No, we all love you. You have a creative posting style that brings out the best in us

**jp400**

**Gwar!**

youngblood wrote:
Gwar! wrote:And they say I am a bad Person!
No, we all love you. You have a creative posting style that brings out the best in us

I submit to the worst aspects of Humanity so that others may appreciate how well they pretend to be good people.

**youngblood**

Thank you. It's an unholy calling but we thank you for your sacrifice.

**Frazzled**

Yeh but your siggie legend still blurs, gioving me a headache...TROLL!!!!!

**jp400**

Wait... Did Frazzled Just call someone a troll?

Dear god thats sig worthy!

**Gwar!**

Frazzled wrote:Yeh but your siggie legend still blurs, gioving me a headache...TROLL!!!!!

I told you to send me a screen shot. Do It, and I can fix it. I'm removing the pink now. Tell me if it fixes it

**legoburner**

The BOFH in me wants to replace your sig with 'gwar is wrong' but thus far I've avoided the temptation

**Gwar!**

legoburner wrote:The BOFH in me wants to replace your sig with 'gwar is wrong' but thus far I've avoided the temptation

As long as you make a backup so I can restore it afterwards, I don't mind if you do

**Frazzled**

Gwar! wrote:
legoburner wrote:The BOFH in me wants to replace your sig with 'gwar is wrong' but thus far I've avoided the temptation
As long as you make a backup so I can restore it afterwards, I don't mind if you do

No its all blurry now. Try pinking up the last quote.

**Clthomps**

Great now the Mod has derailed the thread...

**Ahtman**

What's all this about GWAR?

**greenskin lynn**

to speak gwar's name is to give it power

**jp400**

Ahtman wrote:

What's all this about GWAR?

Family Photo?

**VictorVonTzeentch**

greenskin lynn wrote:to speak gwar's name is to give it power

If we say his name three times does he show up?

Gwar! Gwar! Gwar!

In all seriousness I have no problem with his rules lawyering, it prove beneficial to me when i read them, then read the BGB to see if he is right, and most the time he is.

**Gwar!**

BrotherStynier wrote:
greenskin lynn wrote:to speak gwar's name is to give it power

If we say his name three times does he show up?

Gwar! Gwar! Gwar!

AWWW HELL NO! I was at Satan's Halloween Party! I'm gonna Pop a Cap in Yo Ass!

BrotherStynier wrote:In all seriousness I have no problem with his rules lawyering, it prove beneficial to me when i read them, then read the BGB to see if he is right, and most the time he is.

teach a Man to fish, as they say.

**VictorVonTzeentch**

Gwar! wrote:
AWWW HELL NO! I was at Satan's Halloween Party! I'm gonna Pop a Cap in Yo Ass!

Oh gak!

teach a Man to fish, as they say.

Also teach a man to ruleslawyer...

How'd this topic get on to discussing Gwar?

**Gwar!**

BrotherStynier wrote:How'd this topic get on to discussing Gwar?

people started throwing thinly veiled personal attacks at me and I called them out on it.

**VictorVonTzeentch**

Oh okay that makes sense.

**Dreadwinter**

I think half of these guys have a hard on for Gwar!

Creepy.....

**Gandair**

I like forums.

Teh OT is a forum.

It's just something I add in. I read the off-topic forums as a habit on any website which has themed forums. You find all sorts of interesting stuff in OT forums.

**Relapse**

Gwar! wrote:
BrotherStynier wrote:How'd this topic get on to discussing Gwar?
people started throwing thinly veiled personal attacks at me and I called them out on it.

To be honest, I thought they were talking about Stelek before he got banned.

**Ketara**

Clthomps wrote:Great now the Mod has derailed the thread...