Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Wargey, Nocturne doesn't really fit for this particular rule book, but will in something else....


Coming soon,

Galactic Stratagem

And here's page 21, only one more page to go and then im done with the rule book

And heres the final page of the rule book, i'll be editing and making it into one PDF file with a separate one for the cards, pieces, and maps. Give it a read over and tell me things i should change or make better.

And heres the finished PDF, i noticed theres a page jump but theres no pages missing and i still havent corrected spelling. After i Add this i'll be removing all page images i have up.

I thought you made noctrune

Wargey, Noctrune isn't part of the Stratix Galaxy, so why would I include it in the Battle For Stratix VII rule book? But like I said before fear not because I'm working on an expansion of my game called Galactic Stratagem which will include Noctrune and other famous 40K Locations

Oh I did not realise
In the galctic thingy don't use cadia terra or mars
Use ivsstaan 5 and 3

How come?

No one could take terra or mars and cadia would like be game changing.
But ivstaan V and III are very well known
Maby ad armageddon

A new map i'm making, i still havent had a chance to work on much but if anyone gets a chance to read the rule book let me know what you think

Has anyone had a chance to try this and see if theres anything needing changes or tweaks?

I'm trying to get a game started this weekend trying out your rules, but the first thing that comes to mind is your surrendering chart.

It seems to benefit the person not wanting to fight, Maybe work in some modifiers based on army size.

maybe more like
1 - lose all forces
2 - lose 50% of forces
3- lose 25% of forces
4 - all mobile forces get away
5- caught, must fight
6- Reenforcements arrive, move 500 points from an adjacent territory to aid in the battle.

The surrendering player may spend 5 credits to move up 1 spot on the chart.

I'm curious to know how it went, I lost all these files in a move and have regretted it ever since. Maybe next year I'll get around to updating it with better rules/graphics my skills have increased with photoshop and Ive learned the lesson of balance lol