Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Had it pointed out on another forum the mechanical inadequacies of the design of the mount for the autocannon. Usually its just a case of "because 40k" but I came up with a quick fix I hope you like.



I suppose you could call it a hydraulic lock, opposite to the direction of the recoil. I imagine the barrel assembly slides backwards within the body of the weapon like a howitzer. and it has a slow rate of fire.

Also added more mechanicus bling, and tiny rivets.

A small thing like that, I would be likely to overlook. Having said that, it looks even better

Strange what a difference such a small addition can make. That little bracing arm thingy inproves the look by about a million %. What i want to know is who would be anal enough to point it out though? It looked fine without it.

Thanks guys.

Yeah it is strange how much of a difference it makes, I'm glad I listened.

Snrub: He used words like pivot and shear, so I'm pretty sure he's an engineer

Ahh that would explain a hell of a lot. Bloody engineers and their fancy technical terms. *shakes fist*