Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 Evil Lamp 6 wrote:
How do people feel about deploying the Quad Gun in 2" coherency with the ADL (any part)? This is the compromise we reached in our group.

I would allow it even further something like 4"

There have been long and pointless discussions about it, people won't come to an agreement and mods lock the topic.
HIWPI: Keep it close enough and put it somewhere around the ADL.
It looks quite 'scenic' and I'm not trying to cheese it into some special location.
4" seems to be a good maximum distance.

My advice: Just talk to the other player about it.

I see merit for either side of this debate but I want to throw a question to the 'does not have to touch' crowd:
As the gun encampment is taken in addition to the wall, would you consider it to be part of the same 'cluster' as the wall?

I consider it to be part of the ADL cluster but not an ADL section. Similar to a unit taking a dedicated transport - both use the same FOC slot but operate independent of one another.