Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 trexmeyer wrote:
TLDR: Bitters ex-bfs/gfs say extremely negative things about their former lover. Don't believe them.

On that, we agree. I've seen way too many break-ups where BOTH sides were lying about each other.

 Melissia wrote:

 ZebioLizard2 wrote:

 Melissia wrote:
The "smoke", in this case, is little more than the acrid toxic stench fumed out by spiteful jerks. There's nothing really defensible about it. The blatant lies that were the accusations were really just little more than a thinly veiled excuse to go after a woman whom had already spoken out against harassment.

Someone hasn't actually looked into the fact that the first 'harassment' wasn't actual harassment at all

Yes, I'm well aware of your ignorant claims.

 ZebioLizard2 wrote:
And in this case there was evidence provided by the boyfriend over the issues to begin with, as well as showing things to make sure he hasn't altered the text logs or chats she had herself provided.

Even if we start with the assumption that his version of the story is the only one that matters, as you have done, and that he in fact provided any actual proof for his claims... which is debatable, as angry exes lie about the person they broke up with all the time... it's irrelevant given that his accusations of unethical behavior are provably false; the person he claimed she cheated on him with did not write an article about her after the supposed affair.

Your argument is nonsense.

I'm sorry for the fact that the actual evidence has been provided by the ex who has been cheated on and that you seem to have not actually checked into such acts with full chat logs of her actions that have been provided in a manner that would allow for them to be checked to see if they had been tampered with, this is not a "He Said She Said" so much as "I have evidence of her directly stating these things and have provided them."

Though I am curious which person you are stating, there were multiple mentioned and while some did not directly, were in a position to influence various actions, one of which was on board an award which ended up in her hands.

To the people who started the gak-storm, it was nothing more than a bunch of horse-gak used as an excuse to attack her.

I agree, the internet will take after anything, but at the same time I am one against people taking advantage through various things in order to bolster themselves, especially if they are rather skeevy acts to prop oneself up rather then their own merit.

You might want to tone down the insults however.

 Melissia wrote:
The "smoke", in this case, is little more than the acrid toxic stench fumed out by spiteful jerks.

I was referring more to the apparently numerous people in that corner of the internet who already have something against her (beyond her simply being a woman), at least enough to pounce on the rantings of an angry ex. Then again, I think Lynata is probably correct that is is just a proxy war:

 Lynata wrote:
an ongoing fight between "social justice warriors" and the "white guy defense force"

... which is the only reason it is getting talked about here on Dakka.

Enough.