Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2017/07/24 19:49:18
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Irked Necron Immortal
Newark, CA
|
Gamgee wrote:Also I've actually studied film school movies (and briefly been in) and your not going to win people over by making big epic movies. A movie has ot be about stories and character first.
This.
DC had the right idea with Man of Steel, and got ahead of themselves in Batman Vs. Superman. Don't do that. Don't go too big too fast, and use the grimdark as a backdrop rather than as a focus. Make the movies about people trying their hardest to be points of light in darkness, and make sure there is always hope. If you focus on the grimdark above all else, you won't get a good story. It's part of the reason Warhammer 40k has so many crappy novels.
A 40k Movie needs to NOT be about 40k. It needs to be about people in the 40k universe.
And no, I don't think they could adapt any existing novels. Even the Eisenhorn novels were crap.
Any 40k movie would have to feature a completely new cast. No "famous cameos" of known characters. And the stakes would have to be small. Localized. If it were me I'd start the film on an idealized world rather than some overdeveloped, dark hell-scape of a hive world. Make the world look like an idealized earth in 100 years if we didn't totally mess up the environment.
Honestly, if I were in charge, I wouldn't even worry about the 40k universe backdrop. Make sure the films are cognizant of where they take place, but save most of it for the finale. I'd use Alien and Aliens as a model.
The first movie would be a horror film featuring normal people in extraordinary, horrifying circumstances.
The second movie would be an action-thriller film featuring capable, above-average heroes in over their heads (did I hear someone say, "kill-team"?).
The third movie would be the balls-to-the-wall war film featuring 40K in all it's glory. However, it would still focus on the trials of the main character from the first film as (s)he tries to salvage whatever was possible of their old life while the bombs were dropping.
I'd personally make the films about a Tyranid invasion. I think they're less confusing than chaos daemons. And you'd be able to draw parallels to much more popular films than Event Horizon and the game Doom (there was no movie. It never happened)
|
Wake. Rise. Destroy. Conquer.
We have done so once. We will do so again.
|
|
|
|
2017/07/24 19:53:34
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
A movie about a bunch of survivors dealing a necron invasion would be interesting. Or a film about an investigation about a cult. I think the focus on space marines is to the settings detriment in terms of narration, tbh, because it will always be about supermen doing supermen things. The focus should have been on the Imperial Guard, ordinary humans who have to deal with horrible crap to survive.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/07/24 19:56:33
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
|
|
2017/07/24 19:54:37
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Legendary Master of the Chapter
|
Arandmoor wrote: Gamgee wrote:Also I've actually studied film school movies (and briefly been in) and your not going to win people over by making big epic movies. A movie has ot be about stories and character first. This. DC had the right idea with Man of Steel, and got ahead of themselves in Batman Vs. Superman. Don't do that. Don't go too big too fast, and use the grimdark as a backdrop rather than as a focus. Make the movies about people trying their hardest to be points of light in darkness, and make sure there is always hope. If you focus on the grimdark above all else, you won't get a good story. It's part of the reason Warhammer 40k has so many crappy novels. A 40k Movie needs to NOT be about 40k. It needs to be about people in the 40k universe. And no, I don't think they could adapt any existing novels. Even the Eisenhorn novels were crap. Any 40k movie would have to feature a completely new cast. No "famous cameos" of known characters. And the stakes would have to be small. Localized. If it were me I'd start the film on an idealized world rather than some overdeveloped, dark hell-scape of a hive world. Make the world look like an idealized earth in 100 years if we didn't totally mess up the environment. Honestly, if I were in charge, I wouldn't even worry about the 40k universe backdrop. Make sure the films are cognizant of where they take place, but save most of it for the finale. I'd use Alien and Aliens as a model. The first movie would be a horror film featuring normal people in extraordinary, horrifying circumstances. The second movie would be an action-thriller film featuring capable, above-average heroes in over their heads (did I hear someone say, "kill-team"?). The third movie would be the balls-to-the-wall war film featuring 40K in all it's glory. However, it would still focus on the trials of the main character from the first film as (s)he tries to salvage whatever was possible of their old life while the bombs were dropping. I'd personally make the films about a Tyranid invasion. I think they're less confusing than chaos daemons. And you'd be able to draw parallels to much more popular films than Event Horizon and the game Doom (there was no movie. It never happened) A nid invasion would be cool for that trilogy. Gene stealers in a system, followed by deathwatch coming in to try and clean it up, then an epic battle as the sky rains nids. i think nids would be easier for normal people to understand for sure. Even horizon was an awesome movie.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/07/24 19:55:25
Unit1126PLL wrote: Scott-S6 wrote:And yet another thread is hijacked for Unit to ask for the same advice, receive the same answers and make the same excuses.
Oh my god I'm becoming martel.
Send help!
|
|
|
|
2017/07/24 19:57:22
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
CthuluIsSpy wrote:A movie about a bunch of survivors dealing a necron invasion would be interesting. Or a film about an investigation about a cult.
I think the focus on space marines is to the settings detriment in terms of narration, tbh, because it will always be about supermen doing supermen things.
The focus should have been on the Imperial Guard, ordinary humans who have to deal with horrible crap to survive.
So, basically the last Terminator movie.
|
Six mistakes mankind keeps making century after century: Believing that personal gain is made by crushing others; Worrying about things that cannot be changed or corrected; Insisting that a thing is impossible because we cannot accomplish it; Refusing to set aside trivial preferences; Neglecting development and refinement of the mind; Attempting to compel others to believe and live as we do |
|
|
|
2017/07/24 19:58:19
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
Desubot wrote: Arandmoor wrote: Gamgee wrote:Also I've actually studied film school movies (and briefly been in) and your not going to win people over by making big epic movies. A movie has ot be about stories and character first.
This.
DC had the right idea with Man of Steel, and got ahead of themselves in Batman Vs. Superman. Don't do that. Don't go too big too fast, and use the grimdark as a backdrop rather than as a focus. Make the movies about people trying their hardest to be points of light in darkness, and make sure there is always hope. If you focus on the grimdark above all else, you won't get a good story. It's part of the reason Warhammer 40k has so many crappy novels.
A 40k Movie needs to NOT be about 40k. It needs to be about people in the 40k universe.
And no, I don't think they could adapt any existing novels. Even the Eisenhorn novels were crap.
Any 40k movie would have to feature a completely new cast. No "famous cameos" of known characters. And the stakes would have to be small. Localized. If it were me I'd start the film on an idealized world rather than some overdeveloped, dark hell-scape of a hive world. Make the world look like an idealized earth in 100 years if we didn't totally mess up the environment.
Honestly, if I were in charge, I wouldn't even worry about the 40k universe backdrop. Make sure the films are cognizant of where they take place, but save most of it for the finale. I'd use Alien and Aliens as a model.
The first movie would be a horror film featuring normal people in extraordinary, horrifying circumstances.
The second movie would be an action-thriller film featuring capable, above-average heroes in over their heads (did I hear someone say, "kill-team"?).
The third movie would be the balls-to-the-wall war film featuring 40K in all it's glory. However, it would still focus on the trials of the main character from the first film as (s)he tries to salvage whatever was possible of their old life while the bombs were dropping.
I'd personally make the films about a Tyranid invasion. I think they're less confusing than chaos daemons. And you'd be able to draw parallels to much more popular films than Event Horizon and the game Doom (there was no movie. It never happened)
A nid invasion would be cool for that trilogy. Gene stealers in a system, followed by deathwatch coming in to try and clean it up, then an epic battle as the sky rains nids. i think nids would be easier for normal people to understand for sure.
Even horizon was an awesome movie.
So, Rogue 1 with bugs instead of Empire, including the terminatus destruction of the planet.
|
Six mistakes mankind keeps making century after century: Believing that personal gain is made by crushing others; Worrying about things that cannot be changed or corrected; Insisting that a thing is impossible because we cannot accomplish it; Refusing to set aside trivial preferences; Neglecting development and refinement of the mind; Attempting to compel others to believe and live as we do |
|
|
|
2017/07/24 20:04:26
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Legendary Master of the Chapter
|
agnosto wrote: So, Rogue 1 with bugs instead of Empire, including the terminatus destruction of the planet. What and how so? id think its more like cloverfield mixed with men in black
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/07/24 20:05:28
Unit1126PLL wrote: Scott-S6 wrote:And yet another thread is hijacked for Unit to ask for the same advice, receive the same answers and make the same excuses.
Oh my god I'm becoming martel.
Send help!
|
|
|
|
2017/07/24 20:14:38
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
Desubot wrote: agnosto wrote:
So, Rogue 1 with bugs instead of Empire, including the terminatus destruction of the planet.
What and how so?
id think its more like cloverfield mixed with men in black
Yeah, I was thinking that too. But then my brain ran forward to the end with the planet getting blown up.
To quote Sigourney Weaver from Aliens; "I say we take off and nuke the site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure."
|
Six mistakes mankind keeps making century after century: Believing that personal gain is made by crushing others; Worrying about things that cannot be changed or corrected; Insisting that a thing is impossible because we cannot accomplish it; Refusing to set aside trivial preferences; Neglecting development and refinement of the mind; Attempting to compel others to believe and live as we do |
|
|
|
2017/07/24 20:28:45
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Ancient Venerable Black Templar Dreadnought
Where ever the Emperor needs his eyes
|
Make a movie about an Inquisitor, in the vein of Se7en.
|
|
|
|
2017/07/24 20:33:53
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Auspicious Aspiring Champion of Chaos
|
Arandmoor wrote: Gamgee wrote:Also I've actually studied film school movies (and briefly been in) and your not going to win people over by making big epic movies. A movie has ot be about stories and character first.
This.
DC had the right idea with Man of Steel, and got ahead of themselves in Batman Vs. Superman. Don't do that. Don't go too big too fast, and use the grimdark as a backdrop rather than as a focus. Make the movies about people trying their hardest to be points of light in darkness, and make sure there is always hope. If you focus on the grimdark above all else, you won't get a good story. It's part of the reason Warhammer 40k has so many crappy novels.
A 40k Movie needs to NOT be about 40k. It needs to be about people in the 40k universe.
And no, I don't think they could adapt any existing novels. Even the Eisenhorn novels were crap.
Any 40k movie would have to feature a completely new cast. No "famous cameos" of known characters. And the stakes would have to be small. Localized. If it were me I'd start the film on an idealized world rather than some overdeveloped, dark hell-scape of a hive world. Make the world look like an idealized earth in 100 years if we didn't totally mess up the environment.
Honestly, if I were in charge, I wouldn't even worry about the 40k universe backdrop. Make sure the films are cognizant of where they take place, but save most of it for the finale. I'd use Alien and Aliens as a model.
The first movie would be a horror film featuring normal people in extraordinary, horrifying circumstances.
The second movie would be an action-thriller film featuring capable, above-average heroes in over their heads (did I hear someone say, "kill-team"?).
The third movie would be the balls-to-the-wall war film featuring 40K in all it's glory. However, it would still focus on the trials of the main character from the first film as (s)he tries to salvage whatever was possible of their old life while the bombs were dropping.
I'd personally make the films about a Tyranid invasion. I think they're less confusing than chaos daemons. And you'd be able to draw parallels to much more popular films than Event Horizon and the game Doom (there was no movie. It never happened)
1st film: A scavenger crew from a mining world locates a Space Hulk entering the system. They leap into action to be the first to explore its dark, cramped corridors for lost technology. Slowly, they are picked off one by one. They are not alone. Film ends in a mad dash back to a still-active lifeboat with a horde of Genestealers in hot pursuit. The last two survivors begin the long journey home to Ghosar Quintus.
2nd film: growth of the Genestealer cult.
3rd film: Tyranid invasion of Ghosar Quintus.
Sorry. Only able to flesh out the first film to any degree at this time. I'll think more one how 2 and 3 could develop. Feel free to add.
|
2000 Khorne Bloodbound (Skullfiend Tribe- Aqshy)
1000 Tzeentch Arcanites (Pyrofane Cult - Hysh) in progress
2000 Slaves to Darkness (Ravagers)
|
|
|
|
2017/07/24 21:15:29
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Jinking Ravenwing Land Speeder Pilot
|
Robert Downey Jr. as Ciaphas Cain?
|
6000 pts
2000 pts
2500 pts
3000 pts
"We're on an express elevator to hell - goin' down!"
"Depends on the service being refused. It should be fine to refuse to make a porn star a dildo shaped cake that they wanted to use in a wedding themed porn..." |
|
|
|
2017/07/24 21:16:56
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Legendary Master of the Chapter
|
|
Unit1126PLL wrote: Scott-S6 wrote:And yet another thread is hijacked for Unit to ask for the same advice, receive the same answers and make the same excuses.
Oh my god I'm becoming martel.
Send help!
|
|
|
|
2017/07/24 21:18:04
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Ship's Officer
|
licclerich wrote:As the background is visually rich it seems the idael subject for a movie, so why has no one made one for the cinema?
For it to be good it would require an immense budget, solid director and cast...the chances of all those things coming together for an overall kind of obscure universe is not likely right now. Maybe in 10-20 years when movies are even more burnt out than they are becoming...maybe by then people will be tired of avengers, JL, and superheroes being regurgitated over and over.
|
|
|
|
|
2017/07/24 21:32:41
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Irked Necron Immortal
Newark, CA
|
Thargrim wrote:licclerich wrote:As the background is visually rich it seems the idael subject for a movie, so why has no one made one for the cinema? For it to be good it would require an immense budget Never true. The most amazing films are made by directors with nothing but a neat idea, a ton of passion, a good cast, and a budget large enough to make a movie, but small enough to force them to be creative. It's why I point to Alien as a template film.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/07/24 21:33:04
Wake. Rise. Destroy. Conquer.
We have done so once. We will do so again.
|
|
|
|
2017/07/24 22:13:23
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Thargrim wrote:licclerich wrote:As the background is visually rich it seems the idael subject for a movie, so why has no one made one for the cinema?
For it to be good it would require an immense budget, solid director and cast...the chances of all those things coming together for an overall kind of obscure universe is not likely right now. Maybe in 10-20 years when movies are even more burnt out than they are becoming...maybe by then people will be tired of avengers, JL, and superheroes being regurgitated over and over.
Not necessarily true. As pointed out you could have a planet near earth like as the setting just with some minor gothic architectural nods here and there to show something is off about this world.
Alternatively it could be a small farming village and in the distance you can see the massive towering cities and gothic architecture of the main city and it's just never explained really. This way the CGI budget would be really low as you only need to have a few establishing background shots. Once the war starts and darkness comes maybe some shots of the city on fire, but those are relatively speaking easy things to do from a budget perspective.
From then on it wouldn't take too much to get some old 80's cars and tractors and mod them up a little to look Imperial in design with some icons. Then some props for around the small farming community so maybe a small shrine they prey too. After that you could easily film it in grungy dirty buildings and make people think it's the grim dark home. The cast would also be small, but I would try and get one bigger actor perhaps for the Inquisitor role near the end to build up to the bigger franchise.
The biggest budget sink would then be left to the alien or deamon. Personally I think a futuristic space deamon is a lot more memorable than just another movie with an alien invasion in it. It's a unique take science fiction compared to now and one of the selling points from a movie perspective (as much as I like my Tau).
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/07/24 22:14:35
|
|
|
|
2017/07/25 01:03:31
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Ship's Officer
|
Arandmoor wrote: Thargrim wrote:licclerich wrote:As the background is visually rich it seems the idael subject for a movie, so why has no one made one for the cinema?
For it to be good it would require an immense budget
Never true.
The most amazing films are made by directors with nothing but a neat idea, a ton of passion, a good cast, and a budget large enough to make a movie, but small enough to force them to be creative. It's why I point to Alien as a template film.
Maybe as a type of arthouse movie on a smaller scale, but when I thought 40k movie the first thing that came to mind was thousands of warriors on screen and immense CGI titans and an epic story spanning 2+ hours akin to something from the horus heresy. The thing is it has to convincing, whereas a low budget 40k movie could end up feeling like cosplay on a quite elaborate set. Space marines aren't going to work that well as human bodies in a costume without some changes made. Guardsmen would work, mechanicus could be rigged up in a practical way. I'm not saying it needs 100-200 million dollars but at least 5-10 million at minimum...maybe a little more...otherwise it could be like a non CGI version of that ultramarines movie. One of the bigger hurdles it would have to overcome is the script and dialogue, i've found some of the stuff in 40k novels to be cringe inducing.
We already have a movie about a planet with minor gothic architectural nods, its called Alien 3...the look of the sets and style of that prison is IMO the kind of look i'd want to see.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/07/25 01:06:09
|
|
|
|
2017/07/25 01:07:06
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Repentia Mistress
|
They made a mutant chronicals movie, they could do a 40k flick. Just needs to not be marines.
|
|
|
|
|
2017/07/25 15:01:25
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Steadfast Grey Hunter
|
Movies cost too much and don't give enough time to explain the world a series is the way to go, something that can be related to
My first thought would be a raw guard unit newly deployed as they encounter each new enemy for the first time the viewers can be introduced to them as well.
any marine presence should be very light with no direct interactions have them talked about almost as rumours a friend of a friend met someone who saw one.
|
|
|
|
2017/07/25 17:09:21
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
Glasgow
|
Necromunda would be the way forward I think. You get to set it in the 40K universe but you're dealing with relateable humans. You can have baddie totalitarian arbites keeping the underworld gangs down and whatnot. You'd be getting close to a lot of films that have been made before but it'd be doable.
You could also do an inquisitor thing, pitched like a sci-fi film noir, or a film about guardsmen finding themselves hopelessly outmatched by a xenos threat, and they could be good movies, but you're basically just making Blade Runner or Aliens at that point.
|
|
|
|
2017/07/25 17:11:20
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
Having a Necromunda gangster style film would be cool.
Something like Scarface.
|
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
|
|
2017/07/25 17:53:06
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I like the way this thread is heading! Which successful movies would work well reskinned as 40k?
This would give an idea of what 'real' 40k movie could be made.
|
|
|
|
2017/07/25 17:56:18
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
40K is a very niche product, without the fan base to support a major motion picture.
|
|
|
|
2017/07/25 18:51:23
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Been Around the Block
|
Descent of Angels as a movie series would work.
Kids becoming Knights to fight creatures larger than life on a relatable but distinctly alien Death World. These same men learning of the Lion and his Super Human abilities that he himself has issues with in terms of relating or understanding how different he really is. The Dark Angels abruptly landing and changing their world forever.
Rebellions, mystery, and Sci-Fi Medieval mash-up would provide a solid environment for a series, movie, or any content.
Edit: You don't need an existing fan base for a movie. This helps movies be more successful but an original storyline, or unique perspective on an existing storyline, done right works. Examples like Alien, Avatar, Event Horizon, etc. are tremendously original properties that could be repurposed to Grim Dark.
What you need is a script, a director and producer who believes in the property, and GW to work with the studio on what boundaries within the story need to be maintained or added to fulfill the commercial needs of the film.
For example, very little of the Lion in film for GW, tell it from the perspective of the youth growing up and turning into a Marine so the audience can relate through the entire ordeal. To fulfill the required love back-drop use a girl who loses her childhood love to Knighthood (still able to relate, and have emotional connection, passing by in the halls) and the Imperium (total disconnect by male role due to the process, unrelateable by female role due to being a native of the planet and alien nature of the Imperium).
100% possible.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/07/25 19:06:09
|
|
|
|
2017/07/26 03:52:57
Subject: Re:Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
Ultramarines was actually a decent film! I've watched it about a dozen times now. It's enjoyable enough if you're not expecting it to be the next Godfather. Had the ending been more dramatic, with a bigger fight once Proteus recovers and saves venfor, people would probably be more forgiving.
Oh and the plot hole as to why they couldn't just stop the ship from leaving.....
As for the story.......it was the exact. same. story. as Aliens. So don't fault that.
|
.Only a fool believes there is such a thing as price gouging. Things have value determined by the creator or merchant. If you don't agree with that value, you are free not to purchase. |
|
|
|
2017/07/26 04:27:06
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Rookie Pilot
Lotusland
|
Retrogamer0001 wrote: Gamgee wrote:LEGO is a huge toy company and one of the largest brands with tons of money and clout. GW is a minnow in an ocean.
Which in turn is a Hasbro company, who also owns Magic The Gathering...enough said. It is a corporate behemoth. So yes, I agree with you.
Lego is not owned by Hasbro. It is a publicly traded company domicile do in Denmark, with the descendants of the founder holding 75% of the shares. I couldn't quickly google current values, but in 2012 it was the most valuable toy company ahead of Mattel. In 2013 it was worth almost 3 times the value of Hasbro at $14.6 billion vs $5.4 billion.
... as for the topics of 40K movies, I think a better bet would be to make a good animated series and build from there.
|
|
|
|
|
2017/07/27 06:49:50
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Guard Heavy Weapon Crewman
|
I have tons of reasons to want a 40k movie, from my obvious passion and decades worth of collecting to just a love for the 40k universe and dystopian future flicks in general. But all of that is absolutely dwarfed by 1 thing.
The massive freak out certain groups would have over even showing a literal fascist, xenophobic, fantastical authoritarian theocracy as the good guys lol. You could make vulkun the star and it would still be a giant collective uproar of objection.
I want to keep this on topic, but all it takes is looking at marvel and it's movies for a glimpse at the thought process in Hollywood. Just watch the new spider man and try and tell me if you think they would support a bunch of space nazis ethnically cleansing Xenos and purging degenerates lol
|
|
|
|
2017/07/27 11:47:16
Subject: Re:Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Do it like the ultimate satirical anti-war movie - follow some poor scrub as he gets conscripted into the Guard, follow his 'adventures' as he's shipped out to ever more hellish warzones, with the space marines only ever glimpsed as god-like beings in the far distance, and then he dies horribly at the end for some pointless objective or gets shot by his Commissar for cowardice. Job done.
|
|
|
|
2017/07/27 11:53:26
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
Glasgow
|
Carl wrote:I have tons of reasons to want a 40k movie, from my obvious passion and decades worth of collecting to just a love for the 40k universe and dystopian future flicks in general. But all of that is absolutely dwarfed by 1 thing.
The massive freak out certain groups would have over even showing a literal fascist, xenophobic, fantastical authoritarian theocracy as the good guys lol. You could make vulkun the star and it would still be a giant collective uproar of objection.
I want to keep this on topic, but all it takes is looking at marvel and it's movies for a glimpse at the thought process in Hollywood. Just watch the new spider man and try and tell me if you think they would support a bunch of space nazis ethnically cleansing Xenos and purging degenerates lol
Not sure. Starship Troopers exists. The Forever War is getting made. Loads of Vietnam films are pretty blatant about thinking everyone is a villain.
Sure ST is satire (though plenty people still manage to take it at face value somehow), and most Vietnam films (and The Forever War is essentially a Vietnam story) have likeable central characters even if they paint the US as the villain, but you can do that with guardsmen or underhive gangers, too.
|
|
|
|
2017/07/27 11:56:44
Subject: Re:Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Norn Queen
|
We should pool together and get A1 pictures to make a 40k anime. Kawaii Desu~ Sisters of Battle anyone?
|
|
|
|
2017/07/27 13:35:10
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Angelic Adepta Sororitas
|
You all I think are missing a major point here. Chaos themed horror movie would be a great entry into the mainstream movie market. Going straight for the blockbuster is a bit much. I doubt Nurgle would be received well, and Slaneesh might get to raunchy for keeping it rated R. Khorne and Tzeentch though are begging for it. A descent into the madness of chaos, coupled with a tragic story and semi decent acting would be awesome.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/07/27 13:37:20
|
|
|
|
2017/07/27 13:57:25
Subject: Why has there never been a 40k movie?
|
|
Contagious Dreadnought of Nurgle
|
Although many ideas in this thread sound pretty nice, I find most of them rather uninspiring.
Nobody needs Starship troopers 4 branded 40K, or Judge Dredd, or Alien, or Event Horizon, or The Walking Dead (Nurgle), or Terminator - I could go on.
I think one would have to think about what makes 40K special, not what similarities 40K has to other franchises. Of course you could easily make a Star Wars or Riddick rip-off set in the 40K universe - but why bother with a bad copy?
We've had threads in this forum debating what's actually original about 40K and often they came to the conclusion that there are only few things unique to 40K. If a movie wants to be a 40K movie and not "just another Sci-Fi movie" it'd have to highlight what's special about that universe. For me that would still be the grimdarkness of the Imperium, or the "Fantasy in spaace"-vibe.
I could also see it as a satire as basically that's what 40K is: Put all Sci-Fi und fantasy tropes together, brand it grimdark and put supermaskuline 80's heroes in.
|
|
|
|
|