Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

dode74 wrote:
It's the certainty on display which makes me chuckle more than anything here...

Why, one is correct, the other is not.

Fact is that "shoot" and "fire" *might* be interchangeable.

They are.

Fact is that "resolve attacks" *might* refer to the step or to the entire sequence.

False. it refers to the sequence only.

Fact is that nobody here actually knows, so claims for either one to be "unreasonable" is based solely on interpretation of an ambiguous RAW.

Again your statement is not correct.

The correct parsing of the rules clearly shows one side is correct and one is not.

More undue certainty on show, I see...

One is not necessarily incorrect, the two words are sometimes interchangeable, and "resolve attacks" could refer to either the step or the sequence.

You claiming certainty with respect to a single meaning doesn't equate to you being correct. The one thing I have some certainty about is that you'll keep claiming certainty on this one, though

I'm sorry, I just want to thank you for clearing up a major mistake I've been making. I thought the Fragstorm was separate from the shoot twice rule. I never fired those twice. Only the gauntlets.

Thank you for helping me!

This seems to have gone as far as it productively can. Moving on.