| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/27 22:35:15
Subject: non-imperial and eldar superheavys
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
For things like the ork gargants, necron megalith or tyranid dominatrix do rules for these exist or do you have to proxy them as imperial counterparts (ie a mega-gargant proxied as an imperator or a great gargant as a reaver or warhound)?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/08/27 22:36:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/27 22:37:40
Subject: non-imperial and eldar superheavys
|
 |
The Last Chancer Who Survived
|
The Imperial Answer wrote:For things like the ork gargants, necron megalith or tyranid dominatrix do rules for these exist or do you have to proxy them as imperial counterparts (ie a mega-gargant proxied as an imperator or a great gargant as a reaver or warhound)?
I think they only really exist in fluff terms, but they do have other superheavies. Most of which can be found in the Apoc rulebook and IA books.
Also, a mega-gargant being played as either itself or an imperator, you're looking at a model the size of a small child.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/08/27 22:38:38
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/27 23:01:02
Subject: Re:non-imperial and eldar superheavys
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
I know but I was wondering about them. I notice a lot of army's lack anything comparable to a phantom titan or a reaver titan in the apoc books.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/28 03:49:32
Subject: Re:non-imperial and eldar superheavys
|
 |
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
yeah but most have smaller but cheaper suepr heavies. which are a more realistic option to take in the days of lords of war
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/28 04:08:12
Subject: non-imperial and eldar superheavys
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Well, the Reaver and Phantom only have common use thanks to Armorcast back in the day, and then Forge World finally did their version.
Armorcast also did a less well known great gargant. Hopefully when FW finally puts out the Warlord (and additional guns for the Reaver, since they share weapons) that their next uber-heavy will be a gargant for Orks.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/28 08:48:11
Subject: non-imperial and eldar superheavys
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Tau have the manta the biggest super heavy so far
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/28 09:15:40
Subject: non-imperial and eldar superheavys
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
|
Necrons have their Pylons and Tomb Complex, but most of their Super Heavy counters are not, themselves, super-heavies (Such as the Nightshroud Heavy Bomber, the Tesseract Ark, and the Sentry Pylon).
|

"That time I only loaded the cannon with powder. Next time, I will fill it with jewels and diamonds and they will cut you to shrebbons!" - Nogbad the Bad. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|