Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/21 11:09:41
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Stalwart Dark Angels Space Marine
|
so I've been wondering if I should take either vanguard vets or assault marines in a ravenguard list.
I normally run assaults in friendly games what with being able to get a first turn assault with dawn of war and ravenguard tactics.
However I haven't had any competitive games with my ravenguard yet and I was wondering which ones people would run and in what configuration?
|
"They mostly come out at night, Moooostly" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/21 11:12:50
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Auspicious Daemonic Herald
|
Nothing about the raven guard chapter tactics or Dawn of War deployment lets you assault on the first turn
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/21 11:14:35
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Stalwart Dark Angels Space Marine
|
yeah, scout moves then normal moves first turn plus rerollable assault means a possible 36 inch move
|
"They mostly come out at night, Moooostly" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/21 11:15:16
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Auspicious Daemonic Herald
|
cyphersbootlick wrote:yeah, scout moves then normal moves first turn plus rerollable assault means a possible 36 inch move
You can't charge if you use Scout
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/21 11:45:42
Subject: Re:Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Stalwart Dark Angels Space Marine
|
when was that a thing? no one has had a problem with it at my lgs
|
"They mostly come out at night, Moooostly" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/21 11:47:33
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Auspicious Daemonic Herald
|
You haven't been able to charge after using Scout for several editions now.
The Scout rule is very clear about not charging on the first turn if you use the scout move.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/09/21 11:48:32
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/21 12:10:41
Subject: Re:Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Stalwart Dark Angels Space Marine
|
all well, still would you use vets or assault marines? and in what configuration
|
"They mostly come out at night, Moooostly" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/21 18:31:40
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
!!Goffik Rocker!!
|
cyphersbootlick wrote:yeah, scout moves then normal moves first turn plus rerollable assault means a possible 36 inch move
I assume you're talking about assault marines with jump packs?
Bad news, they don't get scout. Ravenguard tactix specifically states that bulky models don't get scout. And jumppack marines are bulky. You should read your codex a bit more attentively.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/21 19:28:25
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Since Neither gets a first turn assault, the question comes down to how fancy you want to get them. If you want extra wounds for a beatstick HQ like a chaplin then ASM, if you need to bring pain or special toys to the party it is Vanguard. Shrike would really need Vanguard for best effect.
ASM I would go Jmp with one or 2 flamers, running minimal squads for make flame.
VV I like with 2 SS, Sword, Axe, Mace. This makes them threat on everyone and you got 2 guys to soak wounds while you charge in.
Both are good for a turn 2 assault.
Also not sure were you were getting the 36" move from. 6" scout redeploy (infantry), 12" move, 12" charge for a max of 30.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/21 20:29:11
Subject: Re:Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
!!Goffik Rocker!!
|
Where are you getting this scout move for jump infantry?
Strike from the Shadows: Models in this detachment have
the Scout special rule. In addition, on the first game turn,
models in this detachment have the Stealth special rule. Note
that units that include models with the Bulky or Very Bulky
special rules do not benefit from either rule.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/09/21 20:29:25
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/21 20:53:18
Subject: Re:Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Okay, okay jump marines don't get scout. Now, onto the OP's question: how best to field them? I like vanguard vets more because normal ASM have chainswords and bolt pistols. Bolt pistols don't really do much, though, and the flamer is more expensive for ASM. Vanguard Vets get *Really* expensive, though. My brother runs shrike with 5 of them. 2 guys have dual LC and the other two have a power fist/ thunder hammer +SS combo, and its not really fun. 4++ doesn't last as long as it look son paper. I've floated around the idea of ten vanguard vets with power weapons/ LC and a couple storm shields, but at that point, you're looking at 400+ points invested into one unit. The other problem is that in order to have that many points to fit something like that into a normal sized list, you're putting yourself into a deathstar mindset, without getting the firepower of a really expensive deathstar out of it. The key with Vanguard vets is moderation; power weapons, maybe a couple SS, or LC if you're feeling fluffy. They will get expensive fast otherwise. The alternative is non-veteran ASM with no upgrades at all, taken in tens, combat squaded, which you can zip around anywhere you want, and tarpit anything with.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/09/21 21:10:14
I went to Hershey Park in central PA this year, and I have to say I was more than a little disappointed. I fully expected the entire theme park to be make entirely of chocolate, but no. Here in America, we have "building codes," and some other nonsense about chocolate melting if don't store it someplace kept below room temperature. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/21 21:23:53
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
adding the idea of gun slinging vets. 10 with guns akimbo, one plasma/grav and one bolt. that way you get a lot of shooting and get to assault!
|
413th Lucius Exterminaton Legion- 4,000pts
Atalurnos Fleetbreaker's Akhelian Corps- 2500pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/21 21:26:18
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Slashing Veteran Sword Bretheren
|
CrownAxe wrote:Nothing about the raven guard chapter tactics or Dawn of War deployment lets you assault on the first turn
You can always assault on 1st turn if you go 2nd
Vanguard Vets are AWESOME. They are fast and mobile units that make for a decent close combat unit (not too powerful like Honor Guard or too lame like regular assault marines) equipped with frags so they can charge into cover without second thought.
The best thing about them though is the ability to take hidden power AXES. Yes, axes - fists are too costly and on top of all that do not give +1 attack in combination with the bolt pistol. Axes may have a tougher time wounding, but their AP2 and hidden-ness means with a large Vanguard squad you can slice through pretty much anything.
The trouble is not getting shot to bits before reaching your target.
Here's where a jump pack Chapter Master with Artificer armor and Shield Eternal comes into play - place your Vanguard squad in an inverted V formation with the CM at the front and then you can soak all those wounds the enemy shoots into your squad until the CM only has 1 wound left, at which point you can start using Lookout Sir and pass those on a 2+.
In any case, you will get in to cc by the end of turn 2 usually.
I usually take 7 guys
|
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2014/09/21 21:34:35
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/21 22:04:02
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Auspicious Daemonic Herald
|
No they removed that in 7ed. it now says you can't assault on your first turn.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/21 23:08:17
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Stalwart Dark Angels Space Marine
|
sorry about misreading the tactics, in the quick reference area it only specifies the stealth rule as non-beneficial.
I have been running two squads of asm with two plasmas and a flamer lead by a chaplain with plasma and ToT then a librarian running divination.
trying to take everyone in I think I'll run an oversized vets squad with axes, plasmas and ss lead by the chaplain then stick the libby in a tac squad with a rhino or dp
|
"They mostly come out at night, Moooostly" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/21 23:15:17
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Judgemental Grey Knight Justicar
|
Tiger9gamer wrote:adding the idea of gun slinging vets. 10 with guns akimbo, one plasma/grav and one bolt. that way you get a lot of shooting and get to assault!
I have used gunslinging vets to pretty good effect. Only due to their cost, I only ran 5 of them in a drop pod. 3 had dual grav, 2 dual plasma. Pod in, shoot, then next turn charge. 4 attacks on the charge from each vet is nothing to sneeze at.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/21 23:20:20
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Stubborn Dark Angels Veteran Sergeant
|
CrownAxe wrote:
No they removed that in 7ed. it now says you can't assault on your first turn.
actually, there is nothing saying a player cannot assault T1, unless you infiltrate or scout.
|
Wyzilla wrote:
Because Plague Marines have the evasion abilities of a drunk elephant.
Burn the Heretic
Kill the mutant
Purge the Unclean |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/21 23:28:29
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Auspicious Daemonic Herald
|
raiden wrote: CrownAxe wrote:
No they removed that in 7ed. it now says you can't assault on your first turn.
actually, there is nothing saying a player cannot assault T1, unless you infiltrate or scout.
We're talking about Scout
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/22 00:08:49
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Fighter Pilot
|
barebones 5 man assault squads are my all-stars. They are small enough the enemy wont bother targeting them if in cover. As the game wears on they can sneak into the enemy backline causing serious hurt, taking out vehicles and shooty things alike.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/22 00:57:10
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
I toyed with running Vanguards for ages and proxied them in a few set ups, none of which made their points. Just far too overpriced for what they do.
I run a jump chaplain with a 5 man assault squad as my HQ most games, I'll be honest I lose my warlord around 30%-50% of the time but they always make their points back and then some.
The only special gear they get it a Powersword on the sgt (who if I have points I make a vet for the extra attack) and a flamer. The flamer is good at thinning out hordes before you assault.
|
3000 Points - Right Hands of the Emperor, Imperial Fists Successor
1000 Points - Right Hands of the Emperor Elite PDF force
Bolt Action 1500 pts US Army
Bolt Action 1000 pts US Airborne
X Wing - Giant rebel fleet
Halo Fleet Battles - 1000 pt UNSC Force, 1000 pt Covenant Force
======Begin Dakka Geek Code======
DR:80S++G++MB+IPw40k96#+D+A++/areWD-R+T(T)DM+
======End Dakka Geek Code====== |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/22 02:00:11
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Missionary On A Mission
Australia
|
CrownAxe wrote: raiden wrote: CrownAxe wrote:
No they removed that in 7ed. it now says you can't assault on your first turn.
actually, there is nothing saying a player cannot assault T1, unless you infiltrate or scout.
We're talking about Scout
I think he means if the other guy goes first, moves some jump/cavalry/beast etc units 12" forward and then on your first turn you move your guys up 12" and charge. Which could be expected if you were facing Demons or Orks or Nids perhaps.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/22 04:00:46
Subject: Re:Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
!!Goffik Rocker!!
|
In my experience, the key to vanguard vet sucksess is leaving them stock with a single hidden power fist. So that they chop like choppa boyz, survive like marines and have a relatively reasonable cost. But they do need target saturation to do anything, like any other non-deathstar assault-oriented unit.
Are they 100% better than asm?.. Well, it depends. If you play vs eldar or tau - nope, they're, strictly speaking, worse. Cause if you don't get to assault anything with them, you just have more points removed with the exactly same effort and if you get into combat, even stock asm will do the job. But vs guyz like orkses or swarm tyranids, they're quite kicking. This extra attack is well worth the points in this case.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/09/22 04:04:22
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/22 04:27:48
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Been Around the Block
Chico
|
Sir Arun wrote: CrownAxe wrote:
The trouble is not getting shot to bits before reaching your target.
Here's where a jump pack Chapter Master with Artificer armor and Shield Eternal comes into play - place your Vanguard squad in an inverted V formation with the CM at the front and then you can soak all those wounds the enemy shoots into your squad until the CM only has 1 wound left, at which point you can start using Lookout Sir and pass those on a 2+.
In any case, you will get in to cc by the end of turn 2 usually.
I run a 5 man squad of Vanguard Vets with a Captain in Artificer armor. Chapter masters are a bit cheezy to me. Way to many of them floating around. I use a Storm Raven to deliver my jump unit. Because the assault is coming out of a flyer it can be any ware on the field. I assist them with a Dreadnought, also held in the Raven. This unit has taken down Baneblades, Wraith Knights, Riptides, and other star units. The Raven is the only transport other then a Thunderhawk, that can hold jump troops, a very under used special rule. Here is my load out.
Captain = 185
Artificer Armour, Combi Melta, Teeth of Terra, Jump Pack, Digital weapons, Melta bombs.
Vanguard Veterans x5 = 255 pts
Storm Shield, 2x Grav Pistol, Plasma Pistol, Power Axe, Power Maul, Power sword, Power fist, Jump Packs, 4x Melta bombs.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/09/23 07:18:01
gallery_70393_10089_14705.png |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/22 16:49:47
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
That's a nasty tank hunting team IMO
|
3000 Points - Right Hands of the Emperor, Imperial Fists Successor
1000 Points - Right Hands of the Emperor Elite PDF force
Bolt Action 1500 pts US Army
Bolt Action 1000 pts US Airborne
X Wing - Giant rebel fleet
Halo Fleet Battles - 1000 pt UNSC Force, 1000 pt Covenant Force
======Begin Dakka Geek Code======
DR:80S++G++MB+IPw40k96#+D+A++/areWD-R+T(T)DM+
======End Dakka Geek Code====== |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/09/23 19:53:31
Subject: Vanguard vets vs assault marines
|
 |
Battleship Captain
Oregon
|
Five Vanguard with melta bombs make for a cheap anti tank or MC unit.
|
|
 |
 |
|