Switch Theme:

Monofilament Weapons  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in nz
Warp-Screaming Noise Marine





Auckland, New Zealand

The other day I was trying out my small fledging Eldar against MarsNZ and I found myself trying to hunt vehicles with Warp Spiders. I started thinking about what their spinners actually represented and wondered if their pseudo-Rending is actually even appropriate.

Rending implies that if the weapon hits, sometimes your armour doesn't matter, and I get that. But the cloud of wire settling over the target isn't actually cutting through the armour. It's just that if it touches a part of its target that isn't armoured, they get mulched. I understand, as in the case of the Harlequin's Kiss, it is to show how the wire could slip through a chink in your armour, but isn't that what the odds of failing your roll represent?

I thought, surely Fleshbane is more appropriate. Almost every hit will cause wounds, so you have to pray you have thick enough armour. Regular armour saves are your only chance. Most lightly armoured troops would just melt away under the clouds of monofilament wire, but terminators stand a chance. I would even consider giving the spinner three shots, to really show how thick the cloud is (obviously making them aTemplate weapon would be best, but people seem to not want that...)

Does anyone else agree that the rules don't quite represent the fluff properly in this case? What other ideas might be closer to how it is portrayed? Would it need a point reduction / increase to change in this way?
   
Made in si
Foxy Wildborne







In my fix I have them as S4, template, wound vs Initiative, no AP, target unit takes dangerous terrain test next time it moves.

The old meta is dead and the new meta struggles to be born. Now is the time of munchkins. 
   
Made in nz
Warp-Screaming Noise Marine





Auckland, New Zealand

Yeah, wounding vs I works nicely, and has the precedent of Grav weapons wounding against non-toughness. I like that.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: