Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/10 21:41:53
Subject: Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
Hello,
I am looking for a SHT, but don't know which one to get.
perimeters are a CAD for my GK army.
Looking for one with not necessarily the most options, but the biggest punch. if that makes sense.
So which one?
This is regarding, Banehammer, Stormsword, Baneblade, Hellhammer, Stormlord, Doomhammer, Bane sword, Shadowsward.
Thank you for your time.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/01/10 21:53:41
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/10 22:46:31
Subject: Re:Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Did Fulgrim Just Behead Ferrus?
|
The only superheavy available to the Grey Knights is the Thunderhawk. Anything else will require some allies.
|
"Through the darkness of future past, the magician longs to see.
One chants out between two worlds: Fire, walk with me." - Twin Peaks
"You listen to me. While I will admit to a certain cynicism, the fact is that I am a naysayer and hatchetman in the fight against violence. I pride myself in taking a punch and I'll gladly take another because I choose to live my life in the company of Gandhi and King. My concerns are global. I reject absolutely revenge, aggression, and retaliation. The foundation of such a method... is love. I love you Sheriff Truman." - Twin Peaks |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/10 23:14:20
Subject: Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
Oh yes I know that. That's why I mentioned CAD.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/10 23:36:56
Subject: Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Well for starters what is your preferred ally? This will eliminate some of the choices right off the bat.
If you want marines then you have access to the fellblade which is the most durable and has access to legacies of glory, just for example.
If you want IG you wont have access to the fellblade or legacies but you then open up the baneblade and variants.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/11 08:33:04
Subject: Re:Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Douglas Bader
|
Since it sounds like you're only looking at the Baneblade hulls I'll only discuss those.
Good: Stormsword (STR 10 AP 1 with a 10" blast and no cover saves, and 36" range + 12" move is usually enough to hit anything on a normal 40k table), Shadowsword (kills the big tanks).
Decent: Stormblade (longer range than the Stormsword can still be relevant, kills more infantry when cover isn't a major factor), Hellhammer (trade the Stormsword's 10" blast for 7" and a demolisher cannon), Stormlord (immobile bunker with a decent gun).
Terrible: all of the other ones.
|
There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/11 20:29:50
Subject: Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
Thank you for your help. I am looking at the Shadowsword
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/11 21:03:15
Subject: Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
Netherlands
|
You should also pay attention to the legality.
Shadowsword, as example, is Astra Militarium only.
That means you need to take a CAD of AM to go with your GK-Detachment.
The other posts didn't really made clear if you understood that (might be my reading tho).
My favourite would be the Stormlord.
But that is because I play Blood Angels and someone made a great conversion, combined with the Vulcan mega-bolter and that it's an assault vehicle.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/11 21:52:38
Subject: Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
Rules as written there's nothing actually restricting which super-heavies you can have with which army.
To stick to the lore and avoid fuzzy rules arguments like the ones that are about to come out of this post it's probably better to stick to the Thunderhawk only for GK and take a separate CAD to use someone else's Superheavies. Automatically Appended Next Post: Kangodo wrote:You should also pay attention to the legality.
Shadowsword, as example, is Astra Militarium only.
That means you need to take a CAD of AM to go with your GK-Detachment.
The other posts didn't really made clear if you understood that (might be my reading tho).
My favourite would be the Stormlord.
But that is because I play Blood Angels and someone made a great conversion, combined with the Vulcan mega-bolter and that it's an assault vehicle.
You can't assault out of a Stormlord. It allows a certain number of models to shoot as if it were open-topped, it isn't actually open-topped.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/01/11 21:53:12
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/12 16:15:45
Subject: Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
Yeah, I know I'd need to take the CAD, I asked on YMDC and also double checked the BRB.
I think I'll still get the SHT, as a Thunder-hawk Gunship is out of my price range haha.
But thanks for all the help.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/01/12 16:16:28
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/12 16:21:39
Subject: Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
For assaulting out of the Stormlord:
I always thought you could. IIRC, it says "counts as open topped for the purposes of embarking and disembarking only" and whether or not you can assault is worked out when you disembark.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/12 16:54:13
Subject: Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
Netherlands
|
AnomanderRake wrote:Rules as written there's nothing actually restricting which super-heavies you can have with which army.
but Detachments have a restriction on Factions, so you need a rule that gives them the GK-faction.
Escalation says it is AM only.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/12 17:01:12
Subject: Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
WonderD0g wrote:Yeah, I know I'd need to take the CAD, I asked on YMDC and also double checked the BRB.
I think I'll still get the SHT, as a Thunder-hawk Gunship is out of my price range haha.
But thanks for all the help.
Well... You can get a significant discount on a Thunderhawk by just building it out of three Stormravens. Online tutorials on how to do so exist, and I honestly think it looks better than the official model.
Still more expensive than a Baneblade box though.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/13 19:50:04
Subject: Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
Oh right cool. I think I will stay with the SHT, as I just kinda want one haha. But thanks for the help and the suggestions.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/13 20:06:08
Subject: Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
Kangodo wrote: AnomanderRake wrote:Rules as written there's nothing actually restricting which super-heavies you can have with which army.
but Detachments have a restriction on Factions, so you need a rule that gives them the GK-faction.
Escalation says it is AM only.
Escalation is no longer current. It's sorted under "Imperium of Man" in Apocalypse.
What factions things have are occasionally fuzzy.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/13 20:24:23
Subject: Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
Netherlands
|
But isn't Escalation published AFTER Apocalypse?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/13 21:02:48
Subject: Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
AnomanderRake wrote:Kangodo wrote: AnomanderRake wrote:Rules as written there's nothing actually restricting which super-heavies you can have with which army.
but Detachments have a restriction on Factions, so you need a rule that gives them the GK-faction.
Escalation says it is AM only.
Escalation is no longer current. It's sorted under "Imperium of Man" in Apocalypse.
What factions things have are occasionally fuzzy.
Escalation is current.
The rules for Superheavies aren't as per the FAQ, but the LoW data slates most definitely are current.
The factions of other Superheavies are covered in FW's download section.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/01/13 21:04:42
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/13 21:54:07
Subject: Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
The list of who gets what for lords of war is on forgeworld, here:
http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/Downloads/Product/PDF/L/lordsofwar.pdf
it's important to consider what the rest of your army does for considering a superheavy - if you deal with tanks well, one with a large ignores-cover blast will destroy all infantry it aims at. if you have no problems with infantry, the shadowsword is a good bet.
if you struggle to get to combat, take the assault vehicle one.
if you can, I'm pretty sure the baneblade kits are quite easy to make interchangable for the most part, all the hull-mounted weapon types can be swapped and all the turret ones too, with clever magnetisation. give yourself a chance to choose. if you're able to run unfinished models as counts-as, make the basic hull then try the things out for a few games before you choose.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/13 23:25:54
Subject: Re:Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
It can be very situational, and depends mostly on your local meta. The bane blade is cool, but meh in all categories for a super heavy.
Helhammer I the only other turret variant,, and if you play with lots of terrain it's really cool.
Shadows word is cool if there are tons of big models, tanks and Titans running around.
The storm lord is just dumb and cool, and the rest no one cares.
|
iGuy91 wrote:You love the T-Rex. Its both a hero and a Villain in the first two movies. It is the "king" of dinosaurs. Its the best. You love your T-rex.
Then comes along the frakking Spinosaurus who kills the T-rex, and the movie says "LOVE THIS NOW! HE IS BETTER" But...in your heart, you love the T-rex, who shouldn't have lost to no stupid Spinosaurus. So you hate the movie. And refuse to love the Spinosaurus because it is a hamfisted attempt at taking what you loved, making it TREX +++ and trying to sell you it.
Elbows wrote:You know what's better than a psychic phase? A psychic phase which asks customers to buy more miniatures... 
the_scotsman wrote:Dae think the company behind such names as deathwatch death guard deathskullz death marks death korps deathleaper death jester might be bad at naming? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/14 00:10:03
Subject: Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
|
I'm fairly certain that allies don't allow a LoW to be taken... Look at the chart.
|
" $@#& YOU! There are 3 things I want in a guy: Tall, Handsome, and plays Dark Eldar!"-every woman since
November 2010 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/14 01:37:06
Subject: Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
It just depends on what sort of Detachment you're using.
The "Allied Detachment" doesn't have a LoW slot, but that's not the only way to take allies.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/14 02:42:23
Subject: Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
AnomanderRake wrote:Kangodo wrote: AnomanderRake wrote:Rules as written there's nothing actually restricting which super-heavies you can have with which army.
but Detachments have a restriction on Factions, so you need a rule that gives them the GK-faction.
Escalation says it is AM only.
Escalation is no longer current. It's sorted under "Imperium of Man" in Apocalypse.
What factions things have are occasionally fuzzy.
The 7th Ed rulebook directly references Escalation as a rules source. It is absolutely current.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/16 18:40:31
Subject: Re:Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
As far as GW books go the books that where published before 7th edition came out that are current have FAQ's to bring them current, You can find those books here ( http://www.blacklibrary.com/faqs-and-errata.html) and anything published after 7th came out is obviously current.
Forgeworld is a different animal and IMHO is kinda a mess. They don't maintain a publishing order list or some quick reference document for determining which of their titles contains the most current and up to date information. I can be trying to know for sure you are looking at current rules.
As for what kind baneblade or other super heavy tank you should build you need to ask yourself how you plan to use it. As a transport? Do you want it shooting at other tanks/ SHT? do you want it for clearing blobs of infantry?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/16 21:33:43
Subject: Super Heavy Tanks
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Nuts to messing around with allies. if you want a GK lord of war, take a Warhound.
|
DFTT |
|
 |
 |
|